Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:51:53 GMT, Will <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>Michael Gray <mikegray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>news:1h48i31n6m94la8ll63oh0ifr0k5kodnho@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>
>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:53:06 GMT, Will <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>Al Klein <rukbat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>>>news:jdl7i3tlocrinn11mjvcca7ge792og37b2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>>:
>> 
>>>> No, you're the one claiming that your god objectively exists.  
>>>
>>>I never claimed them to be.  In fact, within this thread, I have
>>>claimed just the opposite, that I am not here to prove to close-minded
>>>non- believers the existing of my God, but if you want to know the
>>>truth, simply ask Him whom I serve.
>> 
>> You are certifiably insane.
>> You do know that, don't you?
>> It is an objective fact, judged from your bizarre behaviour and total
>> illogic.
>> 
>
>Great, so it's certified.  I've been called worse by people far more
>qualified than you

Probably not - you don't know Michael's qualifications.

>and yet still here I am, blessed and going on strong.

With your delusion.

>But without crazy people, the world would be a boring place. 

"May you live in interesting times" wasn't a beneficent wish.
-- 
Al at Webdingers dot com
"For aught we know a priori, matter may contain the source, or spring, of
order
originating within itself, as well as the mind does."
- David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion