Re: QUESTION

On 15 Okt., 15:41, Midjis <midwinte...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 15 Oct, 13:58, gudl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
>
>
> > > But Dawkins does not respond to 'theists bringing up their beliefs
> > > inappropriately'.
>
> > That is exactly what he does.
>
> And more, which was my point.  

For example?

However, I forget that sometimes a
> discussion on Usenet is like making wishes to a leprechaun.  Phrasing
> must be absolutely precise.

Actually you said that he "...does not respond to 'theists bringing up
their beliefs
inappropriately"'.





>
> > It is.
>
> [...]
>
> > Telling the truth is not abusive.  If you do not agree with something
> > he says point it out and explain your reasons.
>
> I take it that "it is" is a suitably detailed argument in your eyes?

I take it that you said that he did a specific thing that you disagree
with.  I am asking you what he said and why you disagree.  Is that an
odd question?