Re: QUESTION

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:22:57 -0700, Midjis <midwinter_m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On 12 Oct, 13:45, Al Klein <ruk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Anyone making the claim, believer or not (and why would a non-believer
>> make the claim), assumes the burden of proof.
>
>Look at it this way: a believer believes; has all the proof he or she
>needs already. 

I'm not talking about someone who claims to believe, I'm talking about
someone who claims objective evidence that what he believes in
objectively exists.

> Not one scrap of that proof would satisfy a non-believer, who doesn't
believe.

You present objective evidence of the objective existence of a god -
any god - and there'll be very few atheists left.

>  The non-believer knows that there's nothing there to be proved. 

Most non-believers know only that there's no evidence that there's
anything there.  Provide it and they're no longer non-believers.
-- 
Al at Webdingers dot com
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from
religious
conviction."
- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)