On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:13:03 -0700, Midjis <midwinter_m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>On 10 Oct, 17:33, "Bill M" <wm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> A straight foreword answer means nothing. Provide me with an answer
based on
>> objective verifiable
>> facts and I will give it serious consideration.
>
>I very much doubt that, Bill. The fact is, as you and I (and quite
>probably most other people here) know, you're not looking for
>answers. You're looking for excuses to continue to demand answers.
>The "objective, verifiable facts" you constantly talk about are merely
>a red herring, when you know - as the intelligent man you surely are -
>that religion, faith, belief (call it what you will) has no objective
>basis, and *needs none*.
It does if it claims that its god is objectively real - which
Christianity does.
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"I can't activate two neurons simultaneously, and I vote"
- The theistic majority
|
