"Day Brown" <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1171347718.393925.208700@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.nordic-life.org/nmh/rovas/rovas.htm
> Shows what looks like runes. Why would anyone, who looks at the dates,
> about 5000 BCE, giva **** about whatever went on in Egypt *thousands*
> of years *later*?
>
> No, Egypt didnt invent writing; it just left lots of it around in
> stone to look at.
<snip>
The invention of writing and the origins of the Roman alphabet are
different
topics.
This is the current scholarly convention regarding the origin of the Roman
alphabet:
"The Latin (or, as it is also called, Roman) alphabet appeared in the 7th
century BC as an adaptation of the Etruscan alphabet to the Latin
language.
The Etruscans themselves borrowed their alphabet from the Greek colonists
in
Italy; the origin of the Greek alphabet is traced through Phoenician
scripts
to the North Semitic alphabet, which was already in use in Syria and
Palestine during the 12th c. BC."
(Zdravko Batzarov)
http://www.orbilat.com/Languages/Latin/Grammar/Latin-Alphabet.html
My Thothian argument with Zdravko Batzarov and others is with their
presumption that "The Latin (or, as it is also called, Roman) alphabet
appeared in the 7th century BC as an adaptation of the Etruscan alphabet
to
the Latin language," and that "the Greek alphabet is traced through
Phoenician scripts to the North Semitic alphabet . . ." The Etruscan
alphabet is not the Roman alphabet. The Greek alphabet, the one they're
using now, is not the Phoenician alphabet. They're different alphabets.
All
of the so called research on the subject begins with a presumption. There
was a North Semitic alphabet; there is a modern Roman alphabet; there were
some other alphabets in between, therefore, they must all have originated
from the same source. All of the research has focused on filling in their
presumed connections.
Yes, the North Semitic alphabet or Proto-Canaanite did evolve from earlier
picture writing through clearly traceable stages of development. There are
no clearly traceable stages of development from the North Semitic or
Proto-Canaanite to the modern Greek and Roman alphabets even though they
are
of a much later date. Scholars have massaged and kneaded the evidence to
make it fit their presumptions. The modern Greek and Roman alphabets are
products of the college at Alexandria. Yes of course they're related to
earlier alphabets, but chance evolution is not the relation****p.
> I appreciate your efforts to promote Isis; the Goddess by any name is
> way better than what we have now.
> But common, there's just me, you, and Azure here. If you want to see
> greater acceptance of the Goddess, you havta pick an image more women
> can identify with. Like Demeter, who is Native European. Not African.
> African women dont read this list. They are not all that interested in
> what a white boy would have to say about an African Goddess anyway.
>
I can't pick the Great Mother Goddess of us all any more than I can pick
my
own mother. It isn't a matter of choice. The real mitochondrial Eve is
Nebt
Het, who was the African ancestress of Isis and "mother" of the Egyptian
royal "house." That would be an even more difficult argument to make than
the Isis argument.
Because of Hitler and the Aryans and the Jews, discussing Arian anything
is
taboo. The pre-Egyptian Nile delta civilization that we call "Lower
Egypt,"
was called "Aria." Arian white people lived there. The pre-Egyptian upper
Nile civilization that we call "Upper Egypt" was called "Black Land." It
wasn't called Black Land because of the rich black soil; it was called
Black
Land because black people lived there. Black Land was also an Arian
civilization. The Arians of those days conquered and bred widely. They
interbred with the conquered peoples.
I would be crucified if I got into that discussion on my website. The
nearest thing to it is the Sunwing page where I discuss who and what the
UrReans were. We think of Arians in a racial context, but the original
Arians were UrReans. They were followers of hawk god and sun god religion.
The legend of the phallic god, El, who was the patriarch of all the
Arians,
goes all the way back to the meltdown of the Ice Age. His place of origin
is
unknown, and for everybody else except me, that is immaterial since
everybody else believes he didn't exist anyway. He may have been a
Hungarian - although I personally believe that his "kind" began where what
is now the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea. They spread out from there
when
the melt down of the Ice Age flooded them out of their homeland.
Assur (Osiris) was a descendant of El. All of the humans on this planet
who
have the parted eyebrow are descendants of El via Assur and the womb of
Isis. All of those other mother goddesses of Europe, Asia, and Central
America were descendants of El via Assur and the womb of Isis. That is
what
I believe; that is what I believe will eventually be proven, and I can't
"choose" another goddess. I believe that DNA evidence will eventually
prove
this argument.
Resurrect Isis. We are a family. She's our mother.
|
