Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Goddess Worship > Re: Thoughts on...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 22 Topic 1086 of 1204
Post > Topic >>

Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies

by Azure <tain@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 27, 2007 at 09:49 PM

Midjis wrote:
> 
> Azure <tain@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote :
> 
> > Right, you have a Masonic Update of the Thracian Government.
> 
> Masons have nothing to do with the Thracian government.  Get a grip.

Masons are recent Thracians are ancient.
Masons derived teachings from Thracians.
Templar's and Golden Fleece did also.

> 
> > Your Ego assumes I said such tripe.
> > I said it was ORIGINALLY BASED ON.
> > It is the Idea of We the People, taken to its highest form.
> > (Allegedly)
> 
> Interesting bracketed word, there.  Sure, America's government was
> originally founded on high ideals - but then it met humans, and idealism
> tends to fall apart where that happens.

No then We the People, found ourselves comfortable and secure and went
in our little castles locked the doors and said the world outside does
not exist.
Rights are something which are only there if you protect them, turn your
back and some sucker will take them from you.

> 
> Even if it had worked out entirely as planned, by what measure could we
> say it was more advanced?
> 
> The point here is that saying a form of government is 'advanced' is like
> something is 'modern' - 'modernisation' being something the current
> British government were at one point obsessed with. 

Those who stole the Throne of the Fallen Angels and Drove the
descendants out do not represent "We the People", Bonnie Prince Charlie
did, and he was forced out.

 In order for
> something to be 'modern', all it technically has to do is exist in
> modern times, today.  So 'modernisation' doesn't really mean anything.

Never said it did, I said people forgot their ways and power, the
Government is ours and only exists as long as we allow it.

> 
> Similarly, nothing is specifically implied by saying that a system of
> government is 'advanced'.  It could be massively complicated, but
> oppress the hell out of the people living under it - in which case, does
> its complexity alone make it 'advanced'?  There again, it could be very
> simple, but efficient, like a dictator****p.  Does its efficiency make it
> 'advanced'?  What about a system of government where everyone's equal
> (even though some are more equal than others)?  Is that 'advanced'?

No, only one where We the People rule and exert our power and control.
Then it is advanced.
Where it represents only a select few it is the same old same old.
Bow before me I am God.
Sorry descendant of Vercingetorix, "I Bow to no man", "I am the new
living God, better than the Old God".

> 
> > Drawn upon but purer in form than the French Concept and deriving from
> > the concepts under the Magna Carta.
> > We formed a basis of equalization in the LAW, the Courts, which we
> > predicated upon the Mytho's of the Cave Bears and the ways of Karma.
> 
> See, right up until the cave bears you were doing okay.  Then you lost
> it and started frothing again.

No, the Cave Bears are Britons, and threw the control of the Royals out,
then Gave it back.

> 
> And it's 'mythos'.
> 
> > Yet we now make Justice a whore, who's services are only available to
> > those who can buy her services, but if you have the money you can even
> > rape the hell out of her.
> 
> Indeed.  'Advanced', would you say?

Was until the Anglicans took over the legal system.
> 
> > Your the deranged person.
> > Deny history go ahead.
> 
> I'll deny *your* ideas about history where they're quite obviously
> barking mad.

You are, mine are quite obviously Direct Hits, which you deny.
> 
> > Every coin has 2 sides, every story is carried by the victor, but what
> > was the other guys side.
> > You don't give a ****.
> > YOU SHOULD!
> 
> Calm down.

No, you call a Gaelic a Roman, and treat him as such.
It is a DANGEROUS place you sit.
I see you as Karnac.
You do not understand I am the Horous, the Descendant of Ackhnatin and
Neffertti.
Tepi was Scota's Father as I understand it.
Not a Myth.
> 
> Thing is, you're not telling anyone anything about the point of view of
> the losing side.  All you're doing is making up pseudo-mythical bunk and
> trying to pass it off as secret wisdom.  I'd suggest groups like this
> one are a little too used to that sort of thing.

No, you believe everyone is a liar selling secrets and want nothing but
to disembowel any beliefs.
Does not matter what.
I do not sell secrets.
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-16 23:08:48 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-17 05:01:24 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-18 20:46:40 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-19 11:18:32 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-20 18:30:48 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-21 06:16:12 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-21 22:41:02 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-22 03:52:04 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-22 22:06:30 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-23 05:53:16 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-23 22:30:11 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-24 22:00:54 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-25 08:31:09 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-25 18:46:13 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-26 02:30:32 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-27 00:23:38 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-27 07:26:06 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-27 21:49:35 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-28 04:40:44 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-28 19:08:42 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Midjis <midwinter_m@[E  2007-01-29 04:55:21 
Re: Thoughts on Ba****ng Fluffy Bunnies
Azure <tain@[EMAIL PRO  2007-01-29 19:14:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 18:53:32 CDT 2008.