"Peter Terry" <mombassa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:dLJFj.2054$n8.1961@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Peter Terry" <mombassa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:81HEj.999$n8.645@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Was Jesus ritually sacrificed by a primitive cannibal cult and who
after
>> having killed off his original movement, then went on to form Roman
>> Christianity from which today's churches are spiritual extensions off?
>>
>> There is compelling evidence that the man who was thought to be Jesus
did
>> not die on a cross but died like a lamb to slaughter in an horrific
death
>> by
>> human sacrifice at the hands of a fanatical religious fundamentalist
>> blood
>> cult, who not only drank his blood and ate his vital body parts, but
went
>> on
>> to become the foundations of Christianity.
>>
>> The foundations and dogma of Christianity was manufactured by this same
>> group led by the first anti-Christ, St. Paul. St. Paul played a
dominant
>> hand in this abhorrent original act of ritual cannibalism, not only in
>> Jesus'
>> betrayal and death, but in the violent genocide of the first groups who
>> had
>> been loyal to Jesus and given him shelter. The teachings of Jesus were
>> plagiarised by this violent fanatical blood cult, who went on to
overlay
>> their own primitive pagan religious traditions over his teachings, out
of
>> which Christianity was eventually officially nationalised around the
>> period
>> that the tyrant Roman Emperor Constantine officiated the Council of
Nicea
>> 325AD.
>>
>> The Romans accused the early gentile Christians of cannibalism, because
>> there were. And this abhorrent practice even continues today. Ritual
>> cannibalism is practiced symbolically in the "mass" and "holy
communion"
>> of
>> the Roman Catholic Church.
>>
>> The gospels in today's bible only contain a fraction of what Jesus
said,
>> as
>> most of his beliefs are buried behind primitive religious pagan
>> mythology,
>> these orchestrated by a myriad of copyists and scribes aligned to the
>> Roman
>> Christian Catholic Church of the old Roman Empire. Church dogma such as
>> baptism, holy communion or subtranstantiation, virgin births,
>> resurrection,
>> crucifiction, 12 apostles, miracles, blood as a sacrament, human
>> sacrifice,
>> god-kings as creators, heaven and earth, royal bloodlines, satan and
the
>> devil, claims of godhead, fixed wing angels, atonement, the rapture,
the
>> trinity and purgatory, demon possession, adam and eve, are all models
>> that
>> were plagiarised from a plethora of pagan myths from cults which
existed
>> before the times of Jesus. The Gospels are a collection of sayings by
>> Jesus
>> and others, who have been rewritten over a period of time into
classical
>> pagan storylines using models of theology or doctrine from many
primitive
>> saviour cults of antiquity such as Mithras, most of which was never
>> sup****ted by Jesus anyway.
>>
>> Through enacting certain spiritual knowledge one may remove the layers
of
>> ritual misinformation in the gospels to unearth the truth behind the
>> original story of Christ and the reformed hippie styled Nazarene-Essene
>> movement that sup****ted him.
>>
>> Fortuitously, Jesus actually predicted all of the above.
>>
>> These ideas are sup****ted by: the Canonical Gospels and the account of
>> the
>> crucifiction, New and Old Testament, biblical prophesy, the book of
>> revelations, Jewish- Roman and western history, by anthropology and
>> archaeology, by Christian doctrine- its pageantry and religious
rituals,
>> from the blood soaked writings of the "early church fathers", by the
>> behavioural history of the ancient popes and saints, by the history of
>> primitive religions and prehistoric cultures, known symbols from the
very
>> first Christians and by new theories on how "reincarnation and cosmic
>> memory" enable the tracking of the evolution of the soul .
>>
>> "Father forgive them for they now not what they do"
>>
>> WATCH THIS SPACE
>>
>> Peter Terry
>> http://www.myspace.com/nambassa
>>
>
>
>>"NefeshBarYohai" <tachnan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:eadaa656->c35b-4912-a132-b84b40cdcb61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Why do Christians chow down on Jesus Christ. They eat him and drink
>> his blood.
>
>>
>
> Ritual cannibalism is a primitive conceptual view of ones spirituality,
> which came out of the minds of stone-age people who were without any
> sciences to assist them understand the meaning of life. This lack of
> intellect heralded the advent of all pagan cultures of the world
> wor****ping the sun as a god, when they realised its significance to
> survival and the growing of crops. It was also why the primitives
elevated
> blood as a "holy sacrament" when they realised that when a person was
> wounded and blood flowed and he died- they incorrectly deduced from this
> experience that blood must be the godly basis of life force, thus it was
> wor****ped accordingly.
>
>
>
> The Christian name ritual cannibalism is the religious experience of
> transubstantiation. The historian Durant said that transubstantiation or
> ritual human sacrifice is as old as civilization itself. In fact at some
> point in history every culture of the world partook in human sacrifice
or
> various derivatives of it. Even today in South Pacific, Papua New
Guinea
> some people eat their victims to acquire their power. This practice is
> also partaken in Africa as we speak. "The mindless conclusion to this
> thinking is that to eat the flesh and to drink the blood of one who is
> considered powerful, godly or a king, then their power or wisdom will be
> transferred to the sacrificers." As intelligence evolved and the people
in
> the world became more civilised and the early Pauline Christians could
no
> longer get away with eating their religious victims, which they did
> secretly in the Catacombs and caves of Rome and the empire, these
archaic
> practices became symbolic rather than practical. Thus was manufactured
the
> practice of transubstantiation where wine replaced the blood of Jesus
and
> bread his body. In this manner Jesus himself could be feasted upon by
the
> whole Christian congregation. This new application of a bloodless
> Eucharist format enabled the Catholic Church to come out of the closet
and
> to stop Christians from killing people so that they could then drink
their
> blood and feast upon their bodies. Hence the early Roman version of the
> religion was more palatable and easier to sell to a Roman-gentile
> audience.
>
>
>
> In the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox systems, Holy Communion or
Eucharist,
> to celebrate Jesus' human sacrifice some 2000 years ago, is symbolically
> partaken in the form of bread or a wafer. Holy Communion is distributed
by
> the officiating priest after the re-enactment of Jesus' violent slaying
in
> Voodoo or black magic styled pageant called the Mass. Here the priest
> performs hocus-pocus and deludes the congregation into believing that
he's
> changed wine and bread into Jesus' blood and body. Tradionally at
> communion time, only the priest gets to drink the blood of Jesus while
the
> rest of the congregation is given his body to eat. This reflects the
2000
> year event, when the man thought to be Jesus was ritually cannibalised
and
> only the few officiating high priests (Popes or Pater Patrums, inner
> circle) were sufficiently privileged to drink his warm blood. The next
> hierarchical level equivalent to Priests and Bishops eat his vital body
> parts while the rest of his body was divvied up amongst the lay
followers,
> boiled in big pots and shared amongst the large congregation of the
sect.
> Mithras followers the world over, like the Catholic Church, have a three
> tiered hierarchy of a pope (Pater Partum), bishops and priests.
>
>
>
> PeterT
>
>
|
