Re: Anonymous, what do you think about Jesus Camp? "stresses the need for children to purify themselves in order to be part of the "army of God."

"Gnostic" <bardic26657@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:13rbg2eldv1r1da@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >
> > > I've been a critic of Scientology for over 40 years. My older
> > > sister was at Saint Hill, her son was on the Sea Org. She
> > > took my younger sister to an org in Detroit, where she was
> > > molested. She later committed suicide.
> >
> > Please follow suit and spare us your bull****.
> >
>
>
> Please go **** youself, you son of a *****

With some temperance you can discuss things on a level that makes more
sense.

As in there is merit to "mental boundaries" with words, as much as the
physical boundaries pertaining to abuse. It is upsetting but speak calmly.

And there are differences between bringing in "all other faiths" as in the
frequent defense to ****eld $cn - just like they position themselves next
to
psych crimes. To make themselves fit into "abuse"

And I'm not sure, but the issue defending $cientology as a person whose
faith organization would really be "prostelyzing" to oppose them sounds
conflictual as well. Because I think as a part of the Sklar conundrum,
where
"either their tax exemption should be revoked, or others get the same
privilege" would create as much unity as the Petris Law did.

It's a threat only to those whom this power corrupts of course, whose
doctrine goes beyond realizing that Hubbards words speak for themselves,
without having to push anything more. Or use this cult as a reason to find
the "right" group, using any fed money. Some of the more conservative
groups
would stand to lose tax funds if aligned, through the many alternatively
approved volunteer and FEMA funded programs where faith-based was so
strongly opposed to our Constitution. This is the conflictual mess
resulting
from what has already happened. Sustaining groups in local communities,
renamed to "neighborhood stakeholders" include some of these groups, with
no
need to prove themselves in that smaller community, as they all graduated
to
the federal grant system.

And to have no choice but be subjected to called hated or persecuting any
group to object to abuse based on these privileges...Is to blockade this
other Consitutional right where the money sup****ts such lackluster.

In that respect, many feel that their choice is lost when federal funding
for groups like $cn have  much surpassed the first generation to a double
standard of seeking fed funds over what they already have.

So as the double standard goes with $cientology riling up others to fight
to
sup****t other abuse, or working both sides it's no longer any moral issue.
Pu****ng kids to work as volunteers for a cause and using words of war on
each other to break anyones will is not good.

IMO,

Maureen


>
>