Re: After the Scifags are defeated, the Ziofags and Neofags must be stopped

"Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl>
wrote in message
>
> Try "yet another anti-semitic nutbag".
>


I suppose Winston Churchill was  "yet another anti-semitic nutbag"




Uncovered: Churchill's warnings about the 'Hebrew bloodsuckers'

Unpublished article from 1937 suggests 'aloof' Jews to blame for
antagonism
towards them


By Paul Bignell
Sunday, 11 March 2007

Winston Churchill suggested Jewish people were "partly responsible for the
antagonism" that saw them branded "Hebrew bloodsuckers", according to an
article made public for the first time today.

The 1937 do***ent, "How the Jews Can Combat Persecution", was unearthed by
Dr Richard Toye, a Cambridge University historian. Written three years
before Churchill became Prime Minister, the article has apparently lain
unnoticed in the Churchill archives at Cambridge since the early months of
the Second World War.

The article argues that "the wickedness of the persecutors" was not the
sole
reason for the ill-treatment of Jews down the ages. Churchill criticised
the
"aloofness" of Jewish people from wider society and urged them to make the
effort to integrate themselves."

Dr Toye said: "I nearly fell off my chair when I found the article. It
appears to have been overlooked. I think a lot of people thought that the
file it was in only contained copies of articles that had already been
published. It was certainly quite a shock to read some of these things and
it is obviously at odds with the traditional idea we have of Churchill."

The article was intended for the US publication Liberty but withdrawn when
another magazine Churchill wrote for objected to him supplying a rival.

In the piece Churchill criticised Jewish employers in the clothing trade
and
their use of sweated labour. Because refugee Jews escaping the Nazi regime
in Germany were willing to work for lower wages, this was in his view "bad
citizen****p" because it forced English workers out of jobs - and "bad
policy" as it created anti-Semitism. Churchill says: "The central fact
which
dominates the relations of Jew and non-Jew is that the Jew is 'different'.
He looks different. He thinks differently. He has a different tradition
and
background."

He then goes on to criticise Jewish moneylenders: "Every Jewish
moneylender
recalls Shylock and the idea of the Jews as usurers. And you cannot
reasonably expect a struggling clerk or shopkeeper, paying 40 or 50 per
cent
interest on borrowed money to a 'Hebrew Bloodsucker', to reflect that
almost
every other way of life was closed to the Jewish people."

Dr Toye said: "Although Churchill lapsed into some extremely unfortunate
stereotypes, he did so in the context of trying to be helpful - trying to
help the Jews avoid persecution. But unfortunately he kind of blames the
Jews themselves in part."





http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/uncovered-churchills-warnings-about-the-hebrew-bloodsuckers-439772.html