On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:57:49 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:25:50 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
><gmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:43:10 -0800, Gunner wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 05:38:27 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:11:22 -0500, strabo <strabo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:21:09 -0800, in alt.atheism Gunner
>>>>>> <gunner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>> <1113m3hc0upn15gc9i5nk4hv2vhmvpvoi0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>>>>>> On 12 Dec 2007 17:41:28 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> gunner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Gunner) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:g170m3tmo6dkrpg527t8klq008iqr263nv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Atheism is *not* a philosophy, it is a mere lack of belief in
>>>>>>>>>>> gods.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Atheism, just another faith based belief system.
>>>>>>>> Nonsense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you believe in the flying spaghetti monster?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No? Is that a faith-based belief system or merely the natural
state
>>>>>>>> of a properly functioning human mind?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your diversion with some drivel about pasta is noted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Atheism is indeed a faith based belief system. It proudly
proclaims
>>>>>>> that there is NO god, has never been a god, and there can never be
a
>>>>>>> god.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your claim is false. Atheists do not believe in gods. That is all.
>>>>>> Some may choose to take the next logical step and draw the
conclusion
>>>>>> that no gods exist since no evidence sup****ts any claims about gods
>>>>>> existing, but that is not necessary for atheism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>To *not* believe is a belief.
>>>>
>>>>Abo****e bull****.
>>>>A rock does not believe anything, but you would insist that it
>>>>"believes".
>>>
>>> So you are claiming you are sentient as a rock?
>>
>>Oh do grow up.
>
>It's too late now for the pathetic retard who hides behind the
>cowardly nym of "Gunner", I'm afraid.
Gunner Asch is a cowardly nym?
Interesting. Why would you say that? Other than out of ignorance of
course.
Gunner Asch
|
