On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:59:49 -0800, Gunner wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:28:43 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
> <calee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:21:09 -0800, Gunner
>><gunner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On 12 Dec 2007 17:41:28 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>gunner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Gunner) wrote in
>>>>news:g170m3tmo6dkrpg527t8klq008iqr263nv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Atheism is *not* a philosophy, it is a mere lack of belief in gods.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Atheism, just another faith based belief system.
>>>>
>>>>Nonsense.
>>>>
>>>>Do you believe in the flying spaghetti monster?
>>>>
>>>>No? Is that a faith-based belief system or merely the natural state of
>>>>a properly functioning human mind?
>>>
>>>
>>>Your diversion with some drivel about pasta is noted.
>>>
>>>Atheism is indeed a faith based belief system. It proudly proclaims
>>>that there is NO god, has never been a god, and there can never be a
>>>god.
>>
>>Liar.
>>
>>>All based on Zero evidence of any of the above.
>>
>>Liar.
>>
>>>Just like the most fervent religious person, who may actually believe
>>>based on perceived interactions between himself and a god (belief as a
>>>result of witnessing something apparently divine).
>>
>>Liar.
>>
>>>The Atheist has No evidence either way, yet fervently believes.
>>
>>Liar.
>>
>>>This would be like a person believing that there are NO Tibetans, has
>>>Never been any Tibetans, nor could there ever be Tibetans, simply
>>>because he has never seen one, or never having been to Tibet.
>>
>>Liar.
>>
>>>The Agnostic, is the only logical person, with his "I don't know"
>>>belief.
>>
>>Liar.
>>
>>>So yes, Atheism is just another faith based belief system, all
>>>protestations and swerves off into pasta theory to the contrary.
>>
>>Liar.
>>
>>>Gunner
>
> Denial is not a river in Egypt. Continuing to deny, is a sign of
> serious mental illness, or fanatical Bleeves
You're just in denial about being a serial killer.
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“A metaphysician is one who, when you remark
that twice two makes four, demands to know what
you mean by twice, what by two, what by makes,
and what by four. For asking such questions
metaphysicians are supported in oriental luxury
in the universities, and respected as educated
and intelligent men. ”
- H. L. Mencken
|
