Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2007

Marcia wrote:
> 
> in article hfWdnVE1kojZcqHanZ2dnUVZ_ournZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 John "C" at
> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 9:14 PM:
> 
> >
> > "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:C3625785.1226C%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> in article 8Nydnff0O6oNdKHanZ2dnUVZ_qOknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 John
> > "C" at
> >> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 8:50 PM:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>> news:C362444B.12164%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> in article OrOdnZWif4nXSqHanZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > John
> >>> "C" at
> >>>> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 7:32 PM:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:C36235B8.120E6%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> in article 4MudnW05If5xW6HanZ2dnUVZ_tOtnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> John
> >>>>> "C" at
> >>>>>> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 6:22 PM:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>>>>> news:C36229B0.12082%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> in article
> > d8ydnaB2pY-vJaHanZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> John
> >>>>>>> "C" at
> >>>>>>>> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 5:19 PM:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> news:C3620F99.11FD2%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> in article
> > rMednZIiZ7g8PqHanZ2dnUVZ_rSrnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>> Hagar
> >>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>> hagen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 2:53 PM:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "John "C"" <honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> > message
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > news:NcWdnXtNr_-17KHanZ2dnUVZ_sqinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> > message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who was the kook that was around here a few months
> >>> ago,
> >>>>>>>>> blamed
> >>>>>>>>>>>> everyone of sending him the sasser virus? I thought
> > he
> >>>>> got
> >>>>>>>>>>>> formosa'd.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nice Deco Dick Slurp, Savage Bob!  I give it a "9.8".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your Pal,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> HJ
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Seems that drunken Injun can't help but having a
> > little
> >>>>>>>>> slurpfest whenever
> >>>>>>>>>>> he espies DecoDick's ROOTabago, innit .....
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> John, talking to yourself is a prime kooksign.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This will be quite a surprise to Hagar to hear that he's
> >>>>> just
> >>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>> Sock.  He may not like this news.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LOL. Sorry; I really did think (Charles?) was your sock
> >>> when
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>> read this
> >>>>>>>> message.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've never been able to understand why when someone slams
> >>> (The
> >>>>>>> Most Hated Person On Usenet) Art Deco everyone assumes
> > that
> >>>>> it's
> >>>>>>> me or a "Sock".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hagar and Charles (neither are my socks) don't get along.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Deco's only "Slurpee" is Injun Bob Officer, right now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Now answer me one, What is this rumor that you are rrock's
> >>>>> sock.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Number One  (Hey that rhymed - rrock's sock)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> I haven't heard that rumor. You know he died, don't you?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I knew his "Demon Bot" smoked and died.  Is he building-up
> >>> another
> >>>>> one so that he can be "Top Poster"?
> >>>>
> >>>> Ah, so this is about competition? All I know is, I got an
> > email
> >>> from his
> >>>> wife in my in-box this morning.
> >>>
> >>> OK, I'll bite, what did he die from?
> >>>
> >> No clue. She didn't say, and I didn't think it was my place to
> > ask.
> >
> > I take it that there will be no more "sekret Code" in your
> > messages ever again?
> >
> > Number One
> >
> 
> I wouldn't bet anything on the sekrit code. Everyone uses it, including
you.

No it is a Binary which is mixed into the message proper, few use it.