Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Emacs > Re: Concern ove...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 6 Topic 356 of 376
Post > Topic >>

Re: Concern over proposed EMACScript

by Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 18, 2008 at 06:43 PM

Tim Streater <timstreater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> In article <1b3am6hoid.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> After re-reading the original post:  <latella>never mind</latella>
>> 
>> (the *really* good parodies are the ones you miss on the first
>> read...  thanks to Ben for gently pointing this one out to me)
>
> That should be <nutella> and you don't need any closing tag, for that, 
> ever.

Checking.... turns out I meant <litella>.  You're probably right about
the closing tag, especially in my case.
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Concern over proposed EMACScript
christos.jonathan.hayward  2008-07-18 11:14:58 
Re: Concern over proposed EMACScript
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-07-18 14:27:01 
Re: Concern over proposed EMACScript
Joost Diepenmaat <joos  2008-07-18 22:31:01 
Re: Concern over proposed EMACScript
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-07-18 15:27:06 
Re: Concern over proposed EMACScript
Tim Streater <timstrea  2008-07-18 22:45:42 
Re: Concern over proposed EMACScript
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-07-18 18:43:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 6 5:17:55 CDT 2008.