Tian Yue wrote:
> On Jul 23, 10:14 am, "Ken" <K...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Tian Yue wrote:
>>> On Jul 22, 6:57 pm, "Rich" <deadm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> garland.p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 22, 7:26 am, "Rich" <deadm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> garland.p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 6:16 pm, "Rich" <deadm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> garland.p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Rich" <deadm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> garland.p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> For those NEW to this web site Rich Smith has been
>>>>>>>>>>> screaming Troll and Apostate ( Fanatically ) Every
>>>>>>>>>>> time anyone dares to question his chosen teaching
>>>>>>>>>>> .... for many years.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> "screaming"? "fanatically"? "every time"? Let's
>>>>>>>>>> check the last time and how often I've actually done
>>>>>>>>>> anything even near to that. I'll do a search, not
>>>>>>>>>> for you, since you have yet to recognized the
>>>>>>>>>> hyperbolically false
>>>>>>>>>> nature of your posts like this Garland, but for any
>>>>>>>>>> new readers.http://tinyurl.com/5lzly8Yep,
does
>>>>>>>>>> confirm this post fits the criteria with the content
>>>>>>>>>> "consist(ing) of an apparently foolish contradiction
>>>>>>>>>> of common knowledge,(Google archives don't lie) and
>>>>>>>>>> "a deliberately
>>>>>>>>>> offensive insult"
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not that these all apply to Garland, but since it
>>>>>>>>>> has been a _long_ time, and given the Subject, I'll
>>>>>>>>>> respost a bit of common knowledge from
>>>>>>>>>> the internet about such behavior:
>>
>>>>>> <SNIP links>
>>
>>>>>>>>> Rich, what you say here applies to yourself
>>>>>>>>> perfectly.
>>
>>>>>>>>> You are getting to know your true self. ..... Its
>>>>>>>>> nice to see.
>>
>>>>>>>>> In many groups its suggested that people use a mirror
>>>>>>>>> to see what they are normally not seeing. You've done
>>>>>>>>> well here.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Most spiritual groups claim what you ( Say ) you see
>>>>>>>>> in others is really what you see in your self.
>>
>>>>>>>>> ***** Eckankar says this also.
>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, while I'm not an apostate or troll, some of it
>>>>>>>> applied to me. I've have learned very well from past
>>>>>>>> lives,
>>>>>>>> Eckankar, observing those in this group, and research
>>>>>>>> into those links. That is why it's easy for me to
>>>>>>>> recognize it in others. That's why, unlike you never
>>>>>>>> doing so, I freely admit it.
>>
>>>>>>>> :-p- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>>>>>> Poor, Poor Rich.
>>
>>>>>>> The fact that I've repeated that everyone, everywhere
>>>>>>> Has the same potential for right and wrong.
>>
>>>>>> Ad nauseam... Generalities about everyone don't cut it
>>>>>> though. The point is you have never once _specifically_
>>>>>> acknowledged one of _your_ blatant nonsense
>>>>>> exaggerations, admitted that you were wrong, ever backed
>>>>>> off from outrageously false hyperbolic posts like this
>>>>>> ridiculous example that I 'scream fanatically every
>>>>>> time', or accepted culpability even when it's obvious
>>>>>> these kind of things are so far from the truth; no less
>>>>>> recognize personal responsibility. You've been
>>>>>> freakishly consistent in that over the years. It just
>>>>>> doesn't compute with you. It's OK. I accepted that a
>>>>>> long time ago. But I could be wrong... Can you show one
>>>>>> instance from the hundreds in the archives where I've
>>>>>> pointed these out to you, where you ever acknowledged
>>>>>> it? No. That's why I say that some of those links do
>>>>>> explain and apply to your behavior.
>>
>>>> - Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>>>> In looking back at the last 10,000 years of religious and
>>>>> spiritual manipulation of the m*****, what has changed?
>>
>>>>> Why is humanity still asking the same questions and
>>>>> getting the same answers that benefit a few leaders
>>>>> strong enough to control all others.
>>
>>>>> How is it there has been no new ideas or concepts brought
>>>>> forth to help the general public?
>>
>>>>> The last thing those in control what is change. They need
>>>>> things to stay as they are with them in control and a
>>>>> passive public blindly following orders.
>>
>>>>> The religious and spiritual ideas presented in the past
>>>>> have been designed to keep things exactly as they are.
>>
>>>>> Leaders live in mansions and drive expensive cars while
>>>>> (followers) struggle to survive and send in that (yearly
>>>>> payment) in hopes that they will benefit in the next
>>>>> life.
>>
>>>>> Exploitation of the m***** in the name of God is nothing
>>>>> new; our credit card society has simply made it easier to
>>>>> collect the payments
>>
>>>> Yikes... It's like when confronted with his behavior a
>>>> circuit breaker in his brain trips open and there is a
>>>> memory wipe. It resets, starts over, and he repeats the
>>>> exact same thing he's written before.
>>
>>> I suspect your assumption that Garland is responding to
>>> your "confrontations" of "his behavior" (what are you, a
>>> school marm?) is a bit egocentric on your part, Rich. You
>>> haven't tripped anyone's breaker switch. That's ludicrous,
>>> fella. Get a grip. There is simply no indication you've
>>> had that kind of impact on Garland. That's just your own
>>> puffed up delusion telling you that you have some sort of
>>> profound effect on people. You're just some bullyish guy
>>> on the internet who's on a god-trip, who imagines himself
>>> to be far more im****tant than he really is, as if you were
>>> some sort of avenging angel, and this leads you to believe
>>> others are cowed or intimidated by your "confrontations."
>>
>>> Tianyue
>>
>> Responding to a message by completely ignoring the content
>> of that message as Garland has been known to do is a bit
>> unusual. Maybe he just doesn't want to (or is unable to)
>> address those things.
>>
>> --
>> Ken
>
> A bit unusual? Oh my, one does not want to be unusual! God
> forbid!
Come on now, admit it. You personally *like* being unusual,
don't you?
--
Ken
|
