On Apr 26, 1:49=A0pm, Etznab <etz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 26, 1:46=A0pm, Etznab <etz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > =A0 =A0Came across what I thought was an excellent link -
> > and judging by the subject options at top page.
>
> > =A0 =A0In this one link, a part of the quote reads:
>
> > ".... Strangely, there is no archaeological evidence of
> > armies, slaves, social conflicts or other vices prevalent
> > in ancient societies. Even to the very end, it seems,
> > they kept it clean."
>
> > =A0 =A0That was (in part) in reference to: Disappearance of
> > the Indus Valley Civilization.
>
> > =A0 =A0Looking back at history, ancient history in general,
> > the picture - compared with today - is not always the
> > same, it would seem.
>
> > =A0 =A0IMO, it's not too hard to imagine that people were a
> > lot more "civilized" on this planet at one time. Too bad
> > that history is just now coming to light (if it even sees
> > the light of day at all).
>
> > Etznab
>
> In this one link ...
>
> http://www.livescience.com/history/top10_history_mysteries-1.html
>
> Etznab- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
=2E.. might have to click on the number 1. For some reason,
the link seems to go to number 10.
|
