On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:42:40 GMT, George Hammond
<Nowhere1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:52:40 -0700 (PDT),
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 26 apr, 00:34, George Hammond <Nowhe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:10:18 -0700 (PDT),
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >On 25 apr, 01:14, George Hammond <Nowhe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:45:41 -0700 (PDT),
>>
>> >> "pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >On 23 apr, 23:25, George Hammond <Nowhe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:55:03 -0700 (PDT),
>>
>> >> >> [Hammond]
>> >> >> Wrong Pizzaman. Religion is FOUNDED on exactly my
>> >> >> explanation of "existence". In case you haven't noticed 85%
>> >> >> of the world's population are adherents to one of the 5
>> >> >> major faiths. This means 85% of the world agrees with my
>> >> >> definition of "existence" in principle when it comes to the
>> >> >> scientific phenomenon of "God".
>>
>> >> >[Peter van Velzen]
>> >> >You are saying that religious people generally admit that the only
>> >> >reason why something exists is because they believe it to exist?
>>
>> >> >Peter van Velzen
>> >> >April 2008
>> >> >Amstelveen
>> >> >The Netherlands
>>
>> >> [Hammond]
>> >> Of course not, don't be ridiculous. People (any people)
>> >> believe what they see.
>> >> What the SPOG proves is that NOBODY can see true reality
>> >> because we never reach full growth, and therefore we see a
>> >> CURVED VERSION of reality.
>> >> Now, unaware people think this "curved version " is true
>> >> reality, but more aware people discovered long ago that it
>> >> is curved, and therefore part of true reality is missing, or
>> >> "invisible".
>> >> Religious people are simply people who KNOW ABOUT IT,
>> >> while atheists, the uneducated, stupid or ignorant people
>> >> DON'T KNOW IT.
>> >> The religious people call the phenomenon "God" while
>> >> ignorant and unaware people don't even notice it, until it
>> >> eventually kills them due to an accident, healthl effects,
>> >> mental effects or lact of the ability to protect themselves
>> >> from predators (Evil so called).
>> >> =====================================
>> >> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
>> >> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
>> >> mirror site:
>> >> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
>> >> GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
>> >> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
>> >> =====================================
>>
>> >[Peter van Velzen]
>> >Research has shown that the more educated people are the greater the
>> >chance of them being atheists.
>> >So I am afraid you are mistaken.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> There isn't a head of state in the world, and few if any
>> high ranking public officials who would say that he was an
>> atheist. Common opinion holds that public officals are less
>> ignorant than the highly educated. So I'm afraid you're
>> mistaken.
>
>[Peter van Velzen]
>I wasn't talking about politicians.
>
>
[Hammond]
I was, I referred to "ignorant and unaware people",
politicians are examples of people who are NOT IGNORANT OR
UNAWARE.
Academics DO NOT lead the world, politicians DO.
>
>
>[Peter van Velzen]
>The research was done at university
>The more years students had been studying there,
>the greater the percentage of atheists.
>
>
[Hammond]
This merely proves that modern Academia is very corrupt,
sleazy, and backward. There is no law that says highly
educated people can't be corrupt, sleazy or backward.
>
>
>[Peter van Velzen]
>An atheist politician on the other hand,
>would have better chances telling a lie,
>and saying he "trusted in God".
>
>
[Hammond]
By the same token academics have a better chance of
telling a lie and saying they are atheists and getting away
with it. I'm sure many of the scared lower echelon
academics are dong just that to keep their job. So what's
your point?
Surely you're not going to attempt to refute the SPOG
using "unsup****ted conjectural assertions", are you?
>
>
>[Peter van Velzen]
>Do you expect all atheist politicians to be completely honest like me?
>I don't.
>
>
[Hammond]
Same goes for academics, so what?
>
>
>Peter van Velzem
>April 2008
>Amstelveen
>The Netherlands
>
>PS
>And don't you mind Ken calling you a crackpot.
>He himself is not intelligent enough to understand my comment about
>you being more than an asshole.
>
>
[Hammond]
Look Dutch, Usenet is crawling with criminals, cons
posting from death row, drug addicts, drunks, child
molesters, pedophiles, gun nuts, Nazis, serial killers, wife
beaters, anti Semitic psychos, war criminals, torturers,
sadistic kidnappers, *** trade slave masters, people dying
of terminal V.D., stalkers, foreign spies, suicide bombers,
homicidal Jihadists, KKK members and psychos of all
description. Fact is "normal" people may be in the minority
on Usenet.
All of these people are interested in whether or not
there is a God, including Ken The Crackpot. Until you can
empathetically talk to all of them, you're not qualified to
be toying with the world's first scientific proof of God by
posting frivolous amateur arguments. You ought to know,
you're from Holland and your parents saw the 3rd Reich
occupy your country and murder thousands of innocent people,
including Anne Frank.
"Man up" Dutch, and get with the program, I'm a real
physicist, the SPOG is real science, and it's serious
business.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================
|
