Re: NO EVIDENCE

On Sun, 4 May 2008 21:37:02 -0700 (PDT), Bill Bowden
<wrongaddress@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Message ID:
<2022e49b-f7df-4d86-b880-2e3815b1ff21@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
in alt.atheism;

>On May 4, 12:17 am, "thomas p." <gudl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > How do you describe his sucess?
>>
>>I don't even try.  Why do you keep talking about Prager instead of your
>own ideas; it couldn't be that you are using him as a diversion?
>Furthermore I pointed out problems with his assertions, which you
>Continue to ignore.
>
>My own ideas come from other people with small refinements. I learned
>from experience not to reinvent the wheel. If you don't like Prager,
>take a look at Bill O'Reilly (another heavyweight) on the subject of
>God, morals, and the US constitution .

Oh, yes, Mr. O'Liely.

>]"Fact 1: The Declaration of Independence clearly states the premise of
>the Constitution: "All men are created equal, that they are endowed by
>their CREATOR with certain unalienable rights."

Fact 1:  The DOI is not a legal do***ent.

Fact 2:  Such was customary flowery language.

Fact 3:  At that time, 'men' did not include women.  Nor, with the
existence of slavery, did it include the victims of that horror.

>Created equal means "Free Speech", etc.

No, it does not, and directly the statement is another lie.


>http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/oreilly070802.asp

>-Bill
         

   
             Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
               and
          SCAMPERMEISTER!"

When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert

alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}