Re: THE PROBLEM WITH ADAM?

monkfish wrote:
> 
> bob young wrote:
> 
> > monkfish wrote:
> >> bob young wrote:
> >>
> >> > Man himself makes up his gods
> >> > and then manipulates them
> >> > to his heart's content.
> >> >
> >> > Sad isn't it
> >>
> >> Even if that is the case,
> >> what's wrong with it?
> >
> > there's nothing positive to be said for hallucinating
> >>
> >> Do you like music?
> >
> > Love it.  Play piano.  Used to play trombone when I had the
> > right teeth for the job.
> 
> "Man himself makes up his" songs
> "and then manipulates them
> to his heart's content."
> 
> Wonderful, "isn't it?"
> 
> God is more like music than
> the comicbook superman you are imagining.

Do you get a deep seated feeling of power and influence
whenever you speak on behalf of the god that millions of
brainless twits believe created the entire universe?

I do not 'imagine' any gods.  I leave that to the brainless
twits; they chop and change the status of their gods in tune
with the ever changing and verified results of scientific discovery.

Seen any Christian Angels lately?  [Is it possible anything
could be more banal or primitive than a female form flitting
from here to there with gossamer wings between their
shoulder blades?]

I know you are humorless, nevertheless I will finish with a
man who made millions happy with his humor, who sadly, is no
longer worth us:

"I'm an atheist . . . thank God."................

 ........Dave Allen held no grudge against God, "because I
don't believe in Him, but a
 grudge against all the evil things that are done in His
name, certainly, and
 a grudge against the way they tried to get inside my head
when I was a child".

 [Dave Allen, Comedian 1968-2005]



> 
> Probably sacred.
> 
> --
> monkfish   * alt.atheism is removed from the header because trying to
prove
> the existence of God is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
> ** Atheists have blind faith in their ability to know of all actual or
> possible modes of existence. Such hubris cannot be good for science.