>Reply to article by: Merlin <merlinator@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Date written: Thu, 8 May 2008 09:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
>MsgID:<f2827ce4-5185-43d7-93e3-1626b5a92793@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> In the Garden of Eden, where God placed Adam on the sixth day,
>> >what is the meaning of the number six?
>> The meaning is one more than four and one less than five.
>then why did you bring it up?
I didn't bring it up. You need to read your own postings.
>> >> God had also
>> >> planted a very special tree there which he called "The tree of
knowledge of good
>> >> and EVIL".
>> >ginko baloba?
>> Absolutely not.
>are you saying it was a symbolic tree?
>not a real tree in the first place?
Duh, I'm saying it wasn't a ginko baloba tree.
>> >the tree of the knowledge. can you imagine eating knowledge from a
>> >tree.
>> Nope.
>no imagination. hmmmmmmmmm.
Wrong again.
>> >have heard of the ancients eating written words to gain more of the
>> >meaning.
>> >yet never heard of a tree that spouts knowledge.
>> You never read the Bible.
>was not refering to the bible. was refering to the ancients.
The ancients were in the Bible.
>> >where do you thing this idea of a plant that can liberate?
>> Fantasy.
>yes, and it can be the key to a discussion much deeper than the
>obvious.
Prove it.
>> >do you think this was the same tree jesus was crucified on?
>> Jesus wasn't cruficfied on a tree, he was crucified on a cross.
>> >symbolically even?
>> Bingo! You are quick!
>so what do we do with the symbolic?
We? Do your own homework.
>> >> Where did God get His knowledge of evil when he created the tree of
>> >> knowledge of good and evil --
>> >don't think god had any,
>> Think again.
>god had no knowledge of polarity till he invented it and watched what
>happens.
Haha! Here you go, making up stuff as you go along. Is this an example of
one of
your fantasies gone astray, you know, the kind of fantasy that leads to a
discussion much deeper than the obvious?
>that is the basis of most experimentation today, get an idea and see
>if it works.
Or better yet, see if it fails.
>why would not a story of the creation by a god not include
>experiementation?
Because you are attributing human qualities to a non-human being.
>> >god created this world to learn about this
>> >world, not cause god already knew it.
>> You cannot create something you do not know anything about.
>yesh you can, don't limit yourself to what you know.
>there is an unconscious world, a subconscious world that is greater
>than anything our minds can comprehend.
Just because you say so?
>> >and is not good and evil one of the rule of the universe?
>> Nope.
>polarity seems to be everywhere.
>the orbit of the planets,
Nope, not there.
>the orbit of whole cosmoses.
Not there either.
>everything seems to travel around something in this universe.
That isn't polarity, that is gravity and gravity has no polarity.
You clearly do not know what you are talking about and I'm not wasting my
time
with your illogical make believe fantasies. I am only concerned with
actual
reailty, not your fantasies.
The Sage
=============================================================
http://members.cox.net/the.sage/index.htm
[The current anthropomorphic global warming nonsense is
based on] "inherently untrustworthy climate models, similar
to those that cannot accurately forecast the weather a week
from now" -- Dr. Richard Lindzen
=============================================================
|
