Re: THE PROBLEM WITH JESUS' FORGIVENESS...

Antares 531 wrote:

> On Wed, 7 May 2008 17:19:03 +0100, Andrew <thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>>On 2008-05-07 01:08:55 +0100, "Ralph" <mmman_90@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>
>>> 
>>> "Andrew" <thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:2008050617133950073-thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On 2008-05-05 19:24:39 +0100, "Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>>> 
>>>>> Why did God create sin??? Why not create a world where there is no
>>>>> evil or
>>>>> sin???
>>>> 
>>>> Such would be a world without moral responsibility.
>>> 
>>> Of course it would. It would also be a fantastic world. Too bad that
the
>>> 'Intelligent Designer' didn't create it that way.
>>
>>I'm not a proponent of "intelligent design". I think it's
>>pseudo-science on a par with the study of ley lines. And you say that
>>the world would be fantastic. I have to disagree. I value my freedom of
>>choice very highly.
>>
> I can't explain the VERY RAPID development of complex life forms on
> this planet during such a very short time frame, except by intelligent
> design.
> 
> Then there is that thing of Super String - Membrane Theory and those
> extra dimensions, universes of the multiverse, that fall so
> CONVENIENTLY into place with the Biblical information...Multiverse
> with other universes...levels of Heaven...rolled up like a scroll to
> less than a Planck length.
> 
> Gordon


Yes, it's so nice to have an open mind.

I just cannot fathom why atheists insist that
God has to exist in the mode prescribed by them
when we don't even know what are
all the actual or possible modes of existence.


-- 
monkfish   * alt.atheism is removed from the header because trying to
prove
the existence of God is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
** Atheists have blind faith in their ability to know of all actual or
possible modes of existence. Such hubris cannot be good for science.