thomas p. wrote:
>
> "tension_on_the_wire" <tension_at_home@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i en meddelelse
>
news:a2f34034-c4ff-4576-8c28-3d7ae5e4fbc4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 4, 4:44 am, "thomas p." <gudl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "tension_on_the_wire" <tension_at_h...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i en
>>
meddelelsenews:676caea8-cb2b-4d31-aa86-5cb2b1d0b3ac@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Is there anyone
>> that actually believes that Sadam Hussein was a devout Muslim? Spare
>> me. People kill people, religions do not. The masses that committ
>> atrocities on larger scales are ALWAYS, and I repeat ALWAYS stirred up
>> by a human with ulterior motives. You can never find support for it
>> in the moral code of any major world religion.
>>
>> thomas
>> Apparently you have never read the Bible or the Koran
>
> tension
> That is a totally unsubstantiated accusation and adds nothing to this
> conversation.
>
> thomas
> Nonsense, the reference was very clear, and it makes the very relevant
> point
> that what you said is not true. Instead of suggesting that you did not
> know what you were talking about (which is what I did), I could have
said
> that you lied; I chose to be polite.
>
> tension
> You may disagree with my interpretation of either book, and I assure
> you I have read more than one version of each, and probably more times
> than most people. My sincerity in trying to discuss this topic should
> have convinced you of at least that and deserves a less trivial and
> categorical remark from you.
>
>
> thomas
> I made a reference to the obvious. Both the Bible and the Koran are
full
> of very direct orders from god to commit what we would today call
> atrocities. That is an objective fact.
You really should read the books to the end
and interpret everything in context.
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header because trying to
prove
the existence of God is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
** Atheists have blind faith in their ability to know of all actual or
possible modes of existence. Such hubris cannot be good for science.
|
