For more information:; http://home.comcast.net/~tkeske/
REV WRIGHT IS RIGHT
The Boston Globe referred to Rev. Wright as a "buffoon".
Rosa Brooks of the Los Angeles Time patronizing refers
to Rev Wright as "deluded".
I think that people like her are psychologically operating
under a kind of "bullying effect". This like religion, where there are
certain things that you are compelled to say, and certain things that
you don't DARE say, for fear that you will become the target,
and be shunned, shunned, shunned by all.
It is like waving the flag - a compulsory obligation to make a
big public display of heaping mud all over someone like Rev Wright.
What ever happened to their rosy conservative propaganda about
"being respectful, even though we may disagree with opinions?" '
With Rev Wright, both conservative and "liberal" media alike waste no
time
in name-calling and in breezy, contemptuous dismissal.
Genocide is made so much easier when nearly everyone is in
that state, where they don't dare believe, don't dare say.
The news media is insufferably smug about the question of
whether the U.S. government could have initiated the AIDS epidemic.
The damning questions simply do not get asked. Concerning the
murky origin of AIDS, even the softball questions do not really get
asked. Essentially none of the uncomfortable questions are
explored in any detail.
In the late 1970s, gays involved in an unprecedented hepatitis vaccine
trial started coming down with AIDS, which at that time was a
completely unknown disease, never before recorded as such.
Imagine the scenario: You have just run a vaccine experiment,
involving thousands of men. Many of them are now coming
down with a strange, new disease of unknown origin.
What is the sensible thing to do?
Announce the vaccine to be safe and effective, and approve
its wider use, without even bothering to determine what the
new disease is, or where it came from?
That is exactly what our government did. Why? It flies in
the face of common sense, much less knowledgeable science.
Regardless of the ultimate explanation of AIDS origin, it
would have been inexplicable negligence - at that time,
under that set of known facts - to ignore the possibility
of a vaccine link.
That is only one of many examples of "inexplicable"
facts about the genesis of the AIDS epidemic,
that become quite easily explained - once that you postulate
the possibility of our government intending for an epidemic
to be spread.
Do not be fooled by the propaganda stories about ancient
AIDS cases that were retroactively "diagnosed". Do not get
hung up on whether AIDS was something concocted,
gene-by-gene, in a laboratory. It is not even necessary to imagine
those scenarios. All that would have necessary, to start an epidemic,
would be to discover a rare disease that existed in a remote part of
Africa, then put it wholesale into vaccines, injected into
thousands of black Africans and American homosexuals.
The media that is so self-righteous in condemning Rev Wright
had in contrast ignored for decades key Religious Right
figures like RJ Rushdooney, who had OPENLY advocated
legal extermination of gays. Rushdooney was intimately
associated with the Moral Majority, which was in turn intimately
associated with Ronald Reagan and the GOP. Reagan was
curiously, inexplicably lacking in apparent concern about
a new, fast-spreading epidemic.
Such incestuous interconnections are strangely off-the-radar
of the media establishment.
Then, the media patronizes blacks and gays by informing
us how "paranoid" we are. If anything, the black and gay
populations are slumbering, not "paranoid".
Small wonder that the media is so eager to crush people
like Rev Wright. If the population woke up, and could
see the depths of the murky environment around them,
they would be ready for far more serious confrontations
with the media and political establishment, than simply
the question of who is on top in the latest opinion polls.
Too heavy of a dose of political reality would
probably destroy the existing order. They know it.
Tom Keske
|
