Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christianity > Re: TOO MANY GO...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 8 Topic 22079 of 22518
Post > Topic >>

Re: TOO MANY GODS

by Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 28, 2008 at 04:00 PM

[snips]

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:53:26 +0100, Bill M wrote:

> It is amazing how people can believe in so many different gods when
> there is NO objective verifiable evidence that any of the gods are real.
> The logial evidence is that NO REAL gods actually exist except in the
> imaginations of the believers.

Er, no.  First, there's no such thing as "logical evidence" - although 
one might argue the point with the use of "my bathtub is filled with 
power tools, therefore there's a god" as the contrary stance. :)

Second, the only conclusion we can actually reach from this complete lack 
of evidence is that there is a complete lack of evidence.  That is, the 
lack of evidence of gods simply says we have no reason to take the notion 
seriously, that no self-respecting thinking person can honestly assert 
"is too" based on what's on the table.

The closest we can come to "is not", however, is not quite what you 
suggest - a conclusion - but, rather, simply applying the principle of 
parsimony, to wit, if there's no good reason to think a thing exists, 
don't behave as if it does.

This, for example, is why we actually allow ourselves to make right turns 
when driving - lacking any reason to suspect the presence of evil 
invisible aliens with destruct-o-rays who will va****ize us if we turn 
right, we do not _assume_ such beings exist, therefore we can make right 
turns with a reasonable expectation of surviving the process.

In fact, the same idea applies, day in and day out.  We have no 
particular reason to think that invisible pixies live inside our 
computers, pixies which will cause the machines to explode should we ever 
type the word "wildfire", so we don't simply assume such creatures exist, 
we don't worry overmuch about typing said word.

The same for gremlins in the coffee maker taking a sudden - and lethal - 
dislike to coffee grounds.  And on and on and on.

Gods?  We have bugger all reason to think they exist, any more than the 
computer pixies, coffee maker gremlins or anti-right-turn aliens, so we 
quite properly do what we do in all such cases - we get on with our lives 
with no assumption such things do exist, unless and until evidence shows 
otherwise.

No, we cannot actually conclude such things _do not_ exist.  Indeed, one 
can reasonably argue it is not possible to rule such things out 
entirely.  What we can do, though, is simply note there's no reason to 
think they _do_ exist, and get on with our lives.

What I, personally, find somewhat amusing about the whole thing is that 
there are actually people out there who would discount the anti-right-
turn aliens, or the coffee pot gremlins, or the computer pixies, 
regarding these as "silly" or "unfounded", yet still happily claim that 
gods are real, despite having no more basis for saying that than for 
saying that your coffee pot is inhabited.

Some peoples' minds are truly marvels of inconsistency.

> If there was a REAL god he certainly would not permit all these false
> gods to misled his creations.

Depends.  If one examines the claims about the god of the Bible, 
particularly the OT god, one is led to the inevitable conclusion he's 
evil, psychotic, and jealous, not to mention slightly retarded.  *He* 
might give a damn about such things.

On the other hand, a different god concept may simply not give a damn: "I 
made the universe, set things in motion to produce life, my job's done, 
I'm retired.  Stop bugging me, I'm busy in the garden."  Wor****p a 
different god concept?  Hey, whatever turns your crank.

> There are hundreds of different god
> beliefs. Which one, if ant, is real? If he acually existed he could
> quite easely communicat, directly from his heaven, that he is the real
> god and point out that all the others are fakes.

Assuming that this particular one is the real one.  Although, that said, 
any "god" concept sufficient to create the universe would, presumably, 
have the capacity to drop in and say "hi" from time to time.  Then again, 
this assumes that the god concept involved a) actually exists and b) 
actually gives a damn.

Since we have no reason at all to think either of those points is the 
case, what do we do?  Right: we get on with our lives without worrying 
about gremlins in the coffee pot, aliens at intersections, pixies in the 
computers, or gods in the clouds.
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
TOO MANY GODS
"Bill M" <wm  2008-04-26 16:53:26 
Re: TOO MANY GODS
Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-04-26 16:28:54 
Re: TOO MANY GODS
Preventer of Work <not  2008-04-26 21:42:03 
Re: TOO MANY GODS
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-26 21:33:02 
Re: TOO MANY GODS
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Blattus  2008-04-26 19:26:41 
Re: TOO MANY GODS not if your are MORMON
"curmudgeon" &l  2008-04-26 17:11:17 
Re: TOO MANY GODS
John Locke <johnlocke9  2008-04-26 20:00:49 
Re: TOO MANY GODS
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-28 16:00:16 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 18 11:20:36 CDT 2008.