Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christianity > Re: NO EVIDENCE
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 286 Topic 22090 of 22548
 Post > Topic >>

Re: NO EVIDENCE

by Just Visiting <nospam-webextra@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 27, 2008 at 09:18 PM

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:05:03 -0400, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
<killgod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>I am living a happy life thank you.
>
>I do not believe the HORSE**** RAMBLINGS of superstitious cave dwellers
and 
>goat ****ers
>

Quite frankly, I see you sitting in a corner by yourself so to speak.
It makes me feel sorry for you - no, really, it does. Something is
obviously motivating you to do this on a routine basis. If people are
getting something out of believing in God, why not let them have it.
I'm sorry if anyone has tried to shove Christianity down your throat.
That's not the way it's suppose to happen. It didn't work for me like
that either. Many people have represented Jesus in a bad way.  Anyway,
we must work together so Islam doesn't become stronger in America or
we'll both have to deal with other problematic issues. After all,
Obama is getting Muslim sup****t.




 286 Posts in Topic:
NO EVIDENCE
 "Bill M" <wm  2008-04-27 19:27:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-04-27 19:38:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Just Visiting <nospam-  2008-04-27 23:54:39 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-04-27 21:05:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Just Visiting <nospam-  2008-04-27 21:18:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-04-27 21:59:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 dieHard <dieHard@[EMAI  2008-04-28 13:56:22 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-28 00:58:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Just Visiting <nospam-  2008-04-28 19:41:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-30 04:14:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY "imaginary mythological deity"
 "Pastor Frank"   2008-04-30 10:52:00 
Re: NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY "imaginary mythological deity"
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-30 21:59:05 
Re: NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY "imaginary mythological deity"
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-28 18:07:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY "imaginary mythological deity"
 "Pastor Frank"   2008-05-30 07:59:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 dieHard <dieHard@[EMAI  2008-04-28 13:46:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Just Visiting <nospam-  2008-04-27 19:41:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-04-27 21:05:55 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-28 01:01:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Richo <m.richardson61@  2008-04-27 20:19:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-04-27 20:35:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-04-28 17:01:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-13 14:51:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-13 11:01:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-13 19:10:13 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-14 11:29:29 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 19:29:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-15 00:36:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-15 05:50:29 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-16 13:34:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-16 08:08:14 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Robibnikoff" &  2008-05-16 08:30:51 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-16 08:43:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-16 18:02:51 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-28 05:03:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Risto Karttunen <tipsu  2008-04-28 07:19:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-04-28 17:30:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-04-29 14:18:36 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-04-29 17:09:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-04-30 08:31:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-04-30 20:17:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 06:52:45 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 13:33:56 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 13:45:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-01 04:47:25 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 21:05:29 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-01 19:38:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:23:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:22:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-15 17:57:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-01 08:45:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 21:15:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-01 15:20:57 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:48:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-05 00:04:25 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:21:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-04-30 22:01:08 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "firefly" <f  2008-05-01 22:25:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-02 04:32:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-02 08:46:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-01 22:36:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-02 04:31:47 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 04:32:08 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-02 08:43:42 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-02 06:46:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-02 22:27:04 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-02 18:44:22 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-10 09:04:36 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-10 10:38:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-10 09:08:47 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Pastor Frank"   2008-05-12 06:10:30 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Fred Jones" &l  2008-05-12 11:52:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-15 02:37:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 12:16:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-10 11:14:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-02 09:49:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-02 22:29:18 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 07:55:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-02 22:42:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-02 17:52:43 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-02 18:55:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 17:39:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 John W. Wells <djinn@[  2008-05-10 20:02:18 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 08:57:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 09:14:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 dieHard <dieHard@[EMAI  2008-05-11 14:45:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 14:48:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-11 20:40:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-02 20:05:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 panamfloyd@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-02 16:29:08 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-02 22:12:00 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-03 09:06:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-03 09:46:52 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-05 21:32:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-06 07:19:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-06 03:48:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-06 17:10:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-06 12:04:06 
freedom of religion is a Christian concept
 monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-06 13:13:38 
Re: freedom of religion is a Christian concept
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-07 03:09:13 
How do you know that we are created equal?
 monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-06 13:05:09 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Risto Karttunen <tipsu  2008-05-05 23:41:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-06 17:26:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-06 21:31:39 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:08:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-07 03:17:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-07 18:14:50 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-09 18:15:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Santolina chamaecyparissu  2008-05-06 19:49:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-07 20:56:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-08 09:29:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-07 21:18:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-08 01:42:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-08 15:50:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-08 18:51:57 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:18:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-08 18:20:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-08 21:26:48 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-09 11:49:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 03:04:18 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 03:07:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-09 16:54:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-09 20:05:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-09 19:33:05 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-10 08:35:47 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-09 17:36:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-10 08:29:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-10 03:15:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-10 19:34:42 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-11 17:40:50 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 19:56:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 22:58:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-16 18:00:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-12 01:32:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-11 21:22:57 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:53:22 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-15 21:02:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-11 22:10:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-12 06:55:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 23:07:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-12 17:40:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 23:13:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-12 13:52:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 23:16:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-12 16:31:36 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-12 21:55:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-13 11:47:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-13 09:51:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-13 19:07:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-13 13:20:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-14 13:13:36 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-14 18:03:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-15 05:54:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:40:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-15 11:46:42 
AQOTM Nomination Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:41:32 
Re: AQOTM Nomination Re: NO EVIDENCE
 atheist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-17 01:39:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-15 21:20:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-15 21:23:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-15 23:47:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Virgil <Virgil@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 01:35:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-16 13:30:28 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-16 18:14:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-17 05:06:13 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-18 15:15:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-18 20:36:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-17 08:22:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-17 13:08:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-17 17:39:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-18 08:15:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-17 18:50:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-18 22:57:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-19 08:50:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-19 16:50:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-19 20:34:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-20 08:24:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-20 04:21:38 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-21 00:45:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-19 18:24:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-20 21:22:57 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 04:47:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-21 17:38:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-22 03:08:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-22 12:21:56 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-21 23:25:28 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-22 04:43:04 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 saint7peter@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-22 01:58:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-22 12:25:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-22 20:13:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-23 16:28:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 asilentskeptic <asilen  2008-05-22 20:20:18 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-22 21:06:00 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-22 23:37:41 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-23 15:47:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-05-25 17:10:09 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-23 17:05:29 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-23 21:11:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-24 07:54:04 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-24 08:15:47 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-25 07:57:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-26 09:18:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-24 07:52:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-24 16:37:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-26 19:51:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-06-01 19:16:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-23 17:35:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-23 19:50:24 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-25 11:12:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-25 18:40:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-25 14:15:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-26 19:56:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-26 19:52:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-06-01 19:14:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-25 22:46:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-26 17:21:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-26 19:57:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-27 11:39:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-27 11:44:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-28 18:06:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-29 21:32:14 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-30 13:29:04 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-30 21:49:09 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-27 11:51:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-06-01 23:39:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-06-02 07:04:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-06-02 09:03:39 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-06-04 21:57:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Risto Karttunen <tipsu  2008-05-03 00:42:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-03 20:13:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-03 20:38:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-04 09:17:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-04 06:31:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-04 10:43:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-04 21:37:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-05 00:44:51 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-05 07:19:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:56:38 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-05 16:16:38 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-05 19:34:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-06 07:16:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-10 20:36:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-10 21:52:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 08:23:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-11 09:30:48 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 08:36:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 09:38:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 09:52:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 16:27:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-11 17:39:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 15:00:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 19:28:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 19:39:05 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 08:14:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-11 16:07:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 18:09:56 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-11 10:59:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-13 14:48:13 
How did they know?
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-13 15:13:10 
Re: How did they know?
 Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2008-05-13 15:45:25 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 14:53:13 
Re: How did they know?
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-26 15:42:51 
Re: How did they know?
 duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-05-26 17:47:51 
Re: How did they know?
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-26 19:02:08 
Re: How did they know?
 duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-05-27 06:45:23 
Re: How did they know?
 Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2008-05-13 15:49:42 
Re: How did they know?
 raven1 <quoththeraven@  2008-05-13 18:04:35 
Re: How did they know?
 Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-05-13 22:51:58 
Re: How did they know?
 John Locke <johnlocke9  2008-05-13 16:40:08 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 15:09:53 
Re: How did they know?
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-26 15:38:01 
Re: How did they know?
 John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-05-14 06:44:55 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 15:22:23 
Re: How did they know?
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Hop  2008-05-14 08:28:42 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 15:17:10 
Re: How did they know?
 Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-05-13 21:08:03 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 15:01:13 
Re: How did they know?
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-14 01:59:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 13:34:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-14 10:24:13 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 15:04:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 15:05:58 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-14 11:17:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 19:35:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-14 11:15:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 19:30:58 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-15 00:56:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-05-14 16:45:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 7:57:40 CDT 2008.