Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christianity > Re: NO EVIDENCE
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 286 Topic 22090 of 22550
 Post > Topic >>

Re: NO EVIDENCE

by Just Visiting <nospam-webextra@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 27, 2008 at 07:41 PM

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:27:27 +0100, "Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>I have asked numerous times for someone to provide any
>objective verifiable evidence that any gods actually exist.
>
>No one has ever supplied it. Not even any god.
>
>the logical conclusion is that no real gods exist except in peoples over 
>active imaginations. 
>

Bill M,

Why don't you quit wasting your life with this? Live the happiest life
that you possibly can have until you die. Your belief doesn't convince
most people anyway. Granted, many people have taken the Bible out of
context on many issues. However, you're wasting your precious life
away by sitting on your butt posting these redundant comments and
questions. You have the right to make up your own religion if it makes
you happy but, Bill, please, you're not helping anybody here. Okay?




 286 Posts in Topic:
NO EVIDENCE
 "Bill M" <wm  2008-04-27 19:27:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-04-27 19:38:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Just Visiting <nospam-  2008-04-27 23:54:39 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-04-27 21:05:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Just Visiting <nospam-  2008-04-27 21:18:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-04-27 21:59:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 dieHard <dieHard@[EMAI  2008-04-28 13:56:22 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-28 00:58:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Just Visiting <nospam-  2008-04-28 19:41:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-30 04:14:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY "imaginary mythological deity"
 "Pastor Frank"   2008-04-30 10:52:00 
Re: NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY "imaginary mythological deity"
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-30 21:59:05 
Re: NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY "imaginary mythological deity"
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-28 18:07:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY "imaginary mythological deity"
 "Pastor Frank"   2008-05-30 07:59:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 dieHard <dieHard@[EMAI  2008-04-28 13:46:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Just Visiting <nospam-  2008-04-27 19:41:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-04-27 21:05:55 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-28 01:01:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Richo <m.richardson61@  2008-04-27 20:19:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-04-27 20:35:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-04-28 17:01:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-13 14:51:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-13 11:01:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-13 19:10:13 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-14 11:29:29 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 19:29:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-15 00:36:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-15 05:50:29 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-16 13:34:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-16 08:08:14 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Robibnikoff" &  2008-05-16 08:30:51 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-16 08:43:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-16 18:02:51 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-04-28 05:03:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Risto Karttunen <tipsu  2008-04-28 07:19:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-04-28 17:30:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-04-29 14:18:36 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-04-29 17:09:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-04-30 08:31:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-04-30 20:17:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 06:52:45 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 13:33:56 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 13:45:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-01 04:47:25 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 21:05:29 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-01 19:38:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:23:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:22:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-15 17:57:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-01 08:45:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-01 21:15:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-01 15:20:57 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:48:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-05 00:04:25 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:21:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-04-30 22:01:08 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "firefly" <f  2008-05-01 22:25:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-02 04:32:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-02 08:46:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-01 22:36:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-02 04:31:47 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 04:32:08 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-02 08:43:42 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-02 06:46:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-02 22:27:04 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-02 18:44:22 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-10 09:04:36 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-10 10:38:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-10 09:08:47 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Pastor Frank"   2008-05-12 06:10:30 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Fred Jones" &l  2008-05-12 11:52:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-15 02:37:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 12:16:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-10 11:14:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-02 09:49:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-02 22:29:18 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 07:55:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-02 22:42:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-02 17:52:43 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-02 18:55:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 17:39:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 John W. Wells <djinn@[  2008-05-10 20:02:18 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 08:57:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 09:14:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 dieHard <dieHard@[EMAI  2008-05-11 14:45:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 14:48:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-11 20:40:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-02 20:05:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 panamfloyd@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-02 16:29:08 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-02 22:12:00 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-03 09:06:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-03 09:46:52 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-05 21:32:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-06 07:19:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-06 03:48:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-06 17:10:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-06 12:04:06 
freedom of religion is a Christian concept
 monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-06 13:13:38 
Re: freedom of religion is a Christian concept
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-07 03:09:13 
How do you know that we are created equal?
 monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-06 13:05:09 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Risto Karttunen <tipsu  2008-05-05 23:41:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-06 17:26:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-06 21:31:39 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:08:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-07 03:17:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-07 18:14:50 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-09 18:15:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Santolina chamaecyparissu  2008-05-06 19:49:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-07 20:56:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-08 09:29:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-07 21:18:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-08 01:42:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-08 15:50:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-08 18:51:57 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:18:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-08 18:20:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-08 21:26:48 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-09 11:49:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 03:04:18 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 03:07:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-09 16:54:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-09 20:05:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-09 19:33:05 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-10 08:35:47 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-09 17:36:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-10 08:29:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-10 03:15:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-10 19:34:42 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-11 17:40:50 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 19:56:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 22:58:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-16 18:00:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-12 01:32:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-11 21:22:57 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:53:22 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-15 21:02:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-11 22:10:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-12 06:55:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 23:07:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-12 17:40:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 23:13:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-12 13:52:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 23:16:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-12 16:31:36 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-12 21:55:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-13 11:47:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-13 09:51:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-13 19:07:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-13 13:20:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-14 13:13:36 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-14 18:03:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-15 05:54:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:40:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-15 11:46:42 
AQOTM Nomination Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:41:32 
Re: AQOTM Nomination Re: NO EVIDENCE
 atheist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-17 01:39:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-15 21:20:40 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-15 21:23:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-15 23:47:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Virgil <Virgil@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 01:35:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-16 13:30:28 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-16 18:14:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-17 05:06:13 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-18 15:15:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-18 20:36:16 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-17 08:22:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-17 13:08:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-17 17:39:44 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-18 08:15:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-17 18:50:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-18 22:57:49 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-19 08:50:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-19 16:50:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-19 20:34:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-20 08:24:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-20 04:21:38 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-21 00:45:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-19 18:24:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-20 21:22:57 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 04:47:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-21 17:38:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-22 03:08:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-22 12:21:56 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-21 23:25:28 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Darrell Stec <darrell_  2008-05-22 04:43:04 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 saint7peter@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-22 01:58:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-22 12:25:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-22 20:13:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-23 16:28:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 asilentskeptic <asilen  2008-05-22 20:20:18 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-22 21:06:00 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-22 23:37:41 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-23 15:47:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-05-25 17:10:09 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-23 17:05:29 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-23 21:11:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-24 07:54:04 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-24 08:15:47 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-25 07:57:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-26 09:18:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-24 07:52:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-24 16:37:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-26 19:51:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-06-01 19:16:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-23 17:35:26 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-23 19:50:24 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-25 11:12:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-25 18:40:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-05-25 14:15:33 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-26 19:56:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-26 19:52:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-06-01 19:14:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-25 22:46:11 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-05-26 17:21:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-26 19:57:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-27 11:39:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-27 11:44:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-28 18:06:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-29 21:32:14 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-30 13:29:04 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-30 21:49:09 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill <bil@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-27 11:51:27 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-06-01 23:39:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "John Smith" &l  2008-06-02 07:04:34 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "L. Raymond" &l  2008-06-02 09:03:39 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-06-04 21:57:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Risto Karttunen <tipsu  2008-05-03 00:42:35 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-03 20:13:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-03 20:38:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-04 09:17:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 modematic <modematic@[  2008-05-04 06:31:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-04 10:43:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-04 21:37:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-05 00:44:51 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-05 07:19:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:56:38 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Bill Bowden <wrongaddr  2008-05-05 16:16:38 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-05 19:34:19 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "thomas p." <  2008-05-06 07:16:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-10 20:36:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-10 21:52:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 08:23:17 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-11 09:30:48 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 08:36:46 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 09:38:59 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 09:52:07 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 16:27:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-11 17:39:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 15:00:21 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-11 19:28:06 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 19:39:05 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 08:14:53 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-11 16:07:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 18:09:56 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-11 10:59:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-13 14:48:13 
How did they know?
 Antares 531 <gordonlrD  2008-05-13 15:13:10 
Re: How did they know?
 Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2008-05-13 15:45:25 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 14:53:13 
Re: How did they know?
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-26 15:42:51 
Re: How did they know?
 duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-05-26 17:47:51 
Re: How did they know?
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-26 19:02:08 
Re: How did they know?
 duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-05-27 06:45:23 
Re: How did they know?
 Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2008-05-13 15:49:42 
Re: How did they know?
 raven1 <quoththeraven@  2008-05-13 18:04:35 
Re: How did they know?
 Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-05-13 22:51:58 
Re: How did they know?
 John Locke <johnlocke9  2008-05-13 16:40:08 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 15:09:53 
Re: How did they know?
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-26 15:38:01 
Re: How did they know?
 John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-05-14 06:44:55 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 15:22:23 
Re: How did they know?
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Hop  2008-05-14 08:28:42 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 15:17:10 
Re: How did they know?
 Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-05-13 21:08:03 
Re: How did they know?
 James <bireda@[EMAIL P  2008-05-26 15:01:13 
Re: How did they know?
 gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-14 01:59:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 13:34:32 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-14 10:24:13 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 15:04:31 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 15:05:58 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-05-14 11:17:10 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 19:35:15 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-14 11:15:37 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-14 19:30:58 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 "Adonis" <ze  2008-05-15 00:56:20 
Re: NO EVIDENCE
 Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-05-14 16:45:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 7:23:02 CDT 2008.