On May 8, 3:35=A0pm, Craig Stevens <craig_stev...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Scott:
Someone needs to teach you how archiving works. The original posts
does not go away. And folks (lurkers as you call them) don't waste
time on posters like you. So, I'll only address the points that are
worth addressing:
>>
> What I post and how often I post is none of your business. Most people
don=
't look through
> the archives. This very post and its topic which you seek to diminish
may =
be seen by a
> lurker for the first time. Lurkers see the material at the bottom so you
t=
o can search and
> verify the Jewish Talmud for yourself.
#1- you're the one who's shitting his pants because I "deleted the
post". And Bradbury-you are the kind that thinks that what you read is
the truth, just like the rest of the racist, lazy sheep. I'll judge
Jews by how they act, not by what lazy fat racists pull off of anti-
semitic sites.
> Anyone reading the included texts and links will see what Jews teach.
>
> Hundreds if not thousands of rabbis sucking the bloody penis of the
infant=
> they just circumcised. Why don't you show anywhere in the Law of Moses
whe=
re
> sucking a bloody penis after circumcision is commanded. It's not in the
Bi=
ble
> but it is in the Jewish Talmud which dates from the Pharisees (the same
fi=
lth Jesus
> often condemned for shoving aside Gods commandments to preserve their
trad=
itions of
> men).
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Perverted Jewish circumcision
tradition=
..
>
> http://www.jewishledger.com/articles/2006/02/23/news/news02.txt
> "In metzitzah b'peh, a mohel orally sucks blood from the site of the
genit=
al cut he makes
> during the circumcision procedure."
Jesus was circumcized. So was I, as are most males in the U.S. More
non-Jews are circumcized than Jews.
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt05.html#Sodomy_Approved
> Baby boys may always be used as subjects for sodomy by grown men,
accordin=
g to the Talmud. The
> Pharisaic subterfuge here is that until a child reaches sexual maturity,
c=
apable of sexual
> intercourse, he or she does not rank as a person, hence Biblical laws
agai=
nst sodomy
> (pederasty) do not apply. Throughout the Talmud "nine years and one day"
i=
s the fictitious age
> of male maturity.
Name 1- just 1 is all you have to name.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Sanhedrin 54b
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Our Rabbis taught: In the case of a male child, a young
on=
e is not regarded as on a par
> with an old one; but a young beast is treated as an old one.23 =A0What
is =
meant by this? =97 Rab
> said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as
pede=
rasty with a child
> above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not
t=
reated as with a
> child above that.24 =A0What is the basis of their dispute? =97 Rab
maintai=
ns that only he who is
> able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of
peder=
asty throw guilt
> [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual
in=
tercourse cannot be a
> passive subject of pederasty [in that respect].25
> =A0 Footnotes:
> =A0 23 =A0The reference is to the passive subject of sodomy. As stated
sup=
ra 54a, guilt is incurred
> by the active participant even if the former be a minor, i.e., less than
t=
hirteen years old.
> Now, however, it is stated that within this age a distinction is drawn.
> =A0 24 =A0I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed
sod=
omy with a child of
> lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
> =A0 25 =A0At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Likewise, under "nine years and one day," the "first stage of
intercourse"=
of a boy with the
> mother, or any grown woman, is harmless, Talmudically. Shammai, to seem
mo=
re "strict," lowers
> the age to eight years in some cases. (See Sanhedrin 69b of the Talmud)
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Sanhedrin 69b
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Our Rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her
youn=
g son [a minor], and he
> committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, =97 Beth Shammai
say, =
he thereby renders her
> unfit to the priesthood. =A0Beth Hillel declare her fit. R. Hiyya the
son =
of Rabbah b. Nahmani
> said in R. Hisda's name; others state, R. Hisda said in Ze'iri's name:
All=
agree that the
> connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection;
whilst=
that of one less
> than eight years is not: =A0their dispute refers only to one who is
eight =
years old, Beth Shammai
> maintaining, We must base our ruling on the earlier generations, but6
=A0B=
eth Hillel hold that we
> do not.
> ---------------
>
> "When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing,
for=
when the girl is
> less than this =97 that is, less than three years old =97 it is as if
one =
puts the finger into the
> eye =97 tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come
back=
to the little girl
> under three years." (Kethuboth 11b of the Talmud)
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Kethuboth 11b
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 GEMARA. Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who
has =
intercourse with a grown-up
> woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood. When I
sa=
id it before Samuel
> he said: 'Injured by a piece of wood' does not apply to flesh. Some
teach =
this teaching by
> itself: [As to] a small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up woman.
Rab=
said, he makes her
> [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood; whereas Samuel said:
'Inj=
ured by a piece of
> wood' does not apply to flesh. R. Oshaia objected: WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN
HAS=
HAD INTERCOURSE WITH
> A LITTLE GIRL, OR WHEN A SMALL BOY HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP
WOMAN, =
OR WHEN A GIRL WAS
> ACCIDENTALLY INJURED BY A PIECE OF WOOD =97 [IN ALL THESE CASES] THEIR
KET=
HUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED
> [ZUZ]; SO ACCORDING TO R. MEIR. BUT THE SAGES SAY: A GIRL WHO WAS
INJURED =
ACCIDENTALLY BY A
> PIECE OF WOOD =97 HER KETHUBAH IS A MANEH! Raba said, It means this:
When =
a grown-up man has
> intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less
th=
an this,6 =A0 it is as
> if one puts the finger into the eye;7 =A0 but when a small boy has
interco=
urse with a grown-up
> woman he makes her as 'a girl who is injured by a piece of wood,' and
[wit=
h regard to the case
> of] 'a girl injured by a piece of wood,' itself, there is the difference
o=
f opinion between R.
> Meir and the Sages.
Oh sure, this happens all the time <smile>
>
> I don't hate real Christianity but I do loathe the false antichrist
versio=
n.
So, in your world, 98% of Christianity is wrong? <smile>
|
