Craig Stevens wrote:
> I have download this set of files and it is very useful and well
executed.=
All of you Goy who
> are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no
further=
.. This material is
> free of charge and it has no pop-ups or advertising. It does not add
files=
to your windows
> directory etc. You can even install it on a USB thumb drive and carry
nit =
with you so you can
> show unbelievers what Jews teach about non-Jews and some of their
medicina=
l remedies which are
> a real hoot. Remember the Talmud is supposedly a book of great wisdom
and =
is the centerpiece of
> modern Judaism. http://www.come-and-hear.com/download.html
Thanks, Craig.
I am downloading it right now.
Mirelle
> Here are some entries you can find and verify for yourselves;
>
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_69.html
> Gittin 69a
> For swollen glands,8 R. Johanan said that pellitory leaves are as good
as=
mamru9 and the root
> of pellitory better than mamru, and he should put them in his mouth.
This =
is to prevent it from
> spreading. To soften it he should take bran that came to the top of the
si=
eve and lentils with
> the earth still on them and clover and hemlock flower and the bud of
cuscu=
ta, and he should put
> about the size of a nut in his mouth. To make it burst, someone should
blo=
w into his throat
> seeds of unripe dates, through a wheat straw. To make the flesh close he
s=
hould bring dust from
> the shadow of a privy and knead it with honey and eat. This is
effective. =
For catarrh10 he
> should take about the size of a pistachio of gum-ammoniac and about the
si=
ze of a nut of sweet
> galbanum and a spoonful of white honey and a Mahuzan natla11 of clear12
=
wine and boil them up
> together; when the gum-ammoniac boils, it is all boiled enough. If he
cann=
ot manage this, let
> him take a revi'ith of milk of a white goat
>
> Gittin 69b
> and let it drip on three stalks of carob and stir it with a piece of
stem =
of marjoram; when the
> stem of marjoram is boiled it is all boiled enough. He can also take the
e=
xcrement of a white
> dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should
no=
t eat the dog's
> excrement as it loosens the limbs.
>
> <STOP>
>
> Any Jew could use the excrement of a white dog as a medicinal cure.
Rememb=
er it has to be the
> excrement of a white dog and not a black or brown dog. :-) And to think
t=
he Talmud is
> allegedly Jewish High Wisdom.
>
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_57.html
> Sanhedrin 57a "'With respect to robbery =EF=BF=BD if one stole or robbed
o=
r [seized] a beautiful woman,
> or [committed] similar offences, if [these were perpetrated] by one
Cuthea=
n against another,
> [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an
Israeli=
te by a Cuthean, but
> that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained'" ... 'For murder,
wheth=
er of a Cuthean by a
> Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of
a=
Cuthean by an
> Israelite, there is no death penalty'" ... But how can you say that such
r=
obbery by one Cuthean
> from another is but a 'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since
a =
Cuthean does not
> forgive, is it not actual theft? =EF=BF=BD But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika
a=
nswered; It applies to the
> withholding of a labourer's wage. One Cuthean from another, or a
Cuthean =
from an Israelite is
> forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted."
>
> Footnotes:
> 'Cuthean' (Samaritan) was here substituted by the censor for the
original =
goy (heathen).
> [I.e., though it is forbidden to rob the heathen (v. Yad, Genebah I, 2;
VI=
, 8), the offence was
> non-actionable. For reason, v. B. K. (Sonc. ed.) note on Mishnah 37b.]
>
> <STOP>
>
> Nice people the Jews. It's okay to withhold wages from a goy, it's okay
to=
steal from a goy and
> it is kosher to kill a goy but woe be to the goy who did likewise to a
Jew=
..
>
> In the following entry apologia is made for Jewesses to have ***ual
relati=
ons with dogs and not
> suffer the death penalty lest there wouldn't be any women left for the
pri=
ests to marry. Those
> Talmudic Sages must have had a lot of bestiality in their community for
th=
em to author the
> following claptrap.
>
> Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Yebamoth
>
> Folio 59a
> Rab Judah stated in the name of Rab: A woman who was subjected to
unnatura=
l intercourse is
> disqualified from marrying a priest.36 Raba raised an objection: And
she =
shall be his wife,37
> applies to a woman eligible to marry him. This excludes [the marriage
of] =
a widow38 to a High
> Priest,39 of a divorced woman38 and a haluzah38 to a common priest.
Now=
, how is one to
> understand [the outrage]?40 If it be suggested that it was one of
natural=
intercourse, what
> [it may be asked] was the object of pointing to her widowhood41 when
[her=
prohibition] could
> be inferred from the fact that she had carnal intercourse with a man?42
M=
ust it not
> consequently [be assumed to be] a case of unnatural intercourse; and the
o=
nly reason43 [why
> the woman is forbidden44 is] because she is a widow, and not because
she =
had had carnal
> intercourse!45
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
> Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
>
> [...] Go to web page or download the Talmud to see all of the footnotes
>
> 45 Which proves that unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be
f=
orbidden to marry a
> High Priest. How then could Rab state that a woman in such cir***stances
i=
s forbidden?
> Tractate List / Glossary / Search / Bible Reference
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
>
> Yebamoth 59b
> =EF=BF=BD This1 represents the view of2 R. Meir,3 while Rab holds the
s=
ame view as R. Eleazar.4 If
> [Rab holds the same view] as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing
t=
o her previous carnal
> intercourse5 when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the
fac=
t that she was a
> harlot,6 R. Eleazar having stated that an unmarried man who cohabited
wit=
h an unmarried woman
> with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby a harlot!7 =EF=BF=BD
R.=
Joseph replied:8 When, for
> instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast, where the
r=
eason of 'previous
> carnal intercourse' may be applied but not that of harlot.9 Said Abaye
t=
o him: Whatever you
> prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be'ulah10 she must
also=
be a harlot; and if
> she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a be'ulah either! And were you to
rep=
ly: This case is
> similar to that of a wounded woman,12 [it may be pointed out] that if
[th=
e disqualification
> should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also,13 you will find no
wom=
an eligible to marry
> a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in some way
woun=
ded14 by a splinter!
> No, said R. Zera,15 in respect of a minor who made a declaration of
refus=
al.16
>
> R. ****mi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is
elig=
ible to marry a
> priest.17 Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that
w=
hich is no human
> being,18 though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of
stoning,1=
9 is nevertheless
> permitted to marry a priest.20
>
> When R. Dimi came21 he related: It once happened at Haitalu22 that
while=
a young woman was
> sweeping the floor23 a village dog24 covered her from the rear,25 and
R=
abbi permitted her to
> marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest. But was there a High
Prie=
st in the days of
> Rabbi?26 =EF=BF=BD Rather, [Samuel meant]: Fit for a High Priest.
>
> Raba of Parzakaia27 said to R. A****: Whence is derived the following
stat=
ement which the
> Rabbis made: Harlotry is not applicable to bestial intercourse?
=EF=BF=BD =
It is written, Thou shalt not
> bring the hire of a harlot, or the price of a dog,28 and yet we learned
t=
hat the hire of a
> dog29 and the price of a harlot30 are permitted31 because it is said,
E=
ven both these,28
> two only but not four.
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
> Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
>
> [...] Go to web page or download the Talmud to see all of the footnotes
>
> 6 Who is forbidden not only to a High Priest but also to a common
priest=
(v. Lev. XXI, 7).
> Why, then, did Rab refer to a High Priest only?
>
> 9 A term which is not applicable to bestial intercourse. V. infra.
> 10 [H] one who had experienced carnal intercourse.
> 11 Presumably because her act cannot be regarded as '***ual
intercourse'.=
> 12 V. supra p. 394, n. 8. As in her case marriage with a High Priest is
f=
orbidden (v. our
> Mishnah), though she is no harlot, so also in the case of bestial
intercou=
rse.
> 13 I.e., if injury to the anus is to be subject to the same
restrictions =
as injury to the
> hymen.
>
> 17 Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as
a=
mere wound, and the
> opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a
disqualifi=
cation does not so
> regard such an intercourse either.
> 18 A beast.
> 19 If the offence was committed in the presence of witnesses after due
wa=
rning.
> 20 In the absence of witnesses and warning.
>
> 23 Lit., 'house'.
> 24 Or 'big hunting dog' (Ra****), 'ferocious dog' (Jast.), 'small wild
dog=
' (Aruk).
> 25 A case of unnatural intercourse.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
>
> <STOP>
>
> That "When R. Dimi came21 he related: It once happened at Haitalu22
that=
while a young woman
> was sweeping the floor23 a village dog24 covered her from the rear" is
t=
ruly hilarious
> especially when you see the footnote "24 Or 'big hunting dog' (Ra****),
'f=
erocious dog'
> (Jast.), 'small wild dog' (Aruk)." The Jews even elaborate on the types
of=
dogs mounting their
> Jewesses from the rear or as they said giving them the splinter.
>
> Remember the splinter?
>
> R. Joseph replied:8 When, for instance, the woman was subjected to
interc=
ourse with a beast,
> where the reason of 'previous carnal intercourse' may be applied but not
t=
hat of harlot.9
> Said Abaye to him: Whatever you prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If
s=
he is a be'ulah10
> she must also be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a
b=
e'ulah either! And
> were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman,12
[it=
may be pointed out]
> that if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural
intercourse=
also,13 you will
> find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest [since there is not one]
wh=
o has not been in
> some way wounded14 by a splinter!
>
> Splinter is the Jewish Sage's code word for a dog *****.
>
> Once again that last line "if [the disqualification should be extended
to]=
unnatural
> intercourse also, you will find no woman eligible to marry a [High
Priest =
[since there is not
> one] who has not been in some way wounded by a splinter!"
>
> IOW there wasn't one Jewess who had not been wounded by a splinter or in
p=
lain English
> "unnatural intercourse" aka "intercourse with that which is no human
being=
"
>
> More Talmudic claptrap from New York City's Chabad Lubavitch Jews (These
a=
re the Jews who back
> Hillary Clinton and they are the ones with the quaint hats and long side
b=
urns and beards).
>
> http://www.mnemotrix.com/chabad/
>
> "CB"N - ViewPoint: February 1998 ...Although the Jews are prohibited
from =
speaking out against
> idolatry in lands outside the land of Israel, we must keep in mind that
th=
is is our land, that
> these are our people. The Bible is full of stories about what happens to
G=
entile lands that do
> not enforce the prohibition of idolatry.
> Why don't we direct our energies on doing something about the
idolatry =
within our own land?
> Christianity clearly violates the two primary Laws of the Torah, that of
i=
dolatry and
> blasphemy.
> We need to take action. We need to go on the offensive. We need to
stri=
ve to establish
> courts that uphold all of the Laws of Noah, not just a few of them. And
ma=
ybe then, when the
> Church is too busy trying to save its own idolatrous skin to worry about
c=
onverting the Jews,
> will they have the time to do other things, such as teach us the Sheva
Mit=
zvot."
> http://tinyurl.com/43nfx3
>
> "CB"N - Mo****ach ..Even within ka'al B'nei Noach we find individuals who
s=
till struggle to keep
> their belief in Jesus intact. Instead of believing in the Gentiles'
Jesus,=
they now believe in
> a Jewish Jesus - and they now call him Yeshua HaMo****ach (Yeshua the
Messi=
ah). They strip away
> the Christian's anglo-saxon garments of Jesus and redress him in a more
et=
hnic Jewish costume.
> Now Yeshua is introduced as an Orthodox rabbi, complete with tzitzits,
tal=
lit, and tefillin.
> And by doing this to Jesus, they believe they have rectified the
Church's =
whitewa****ng of a
> Jewish Yeshua into a figure called Jesus, and that they have restored
the =
truth to the
> world..." http://tinyurl.com/5we3py
>
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+hwwBm3e7xrwwebxXDqFqGgrG=
o5BowDarnwBrnDtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html#hit1
>
> "CB"N - The Covenant of Everlasting Life - The idea of everlasting life
is=
rather appealing to
> most folks... And now a personal observation, if you please: If (indeed,
I=
F: hypothetical
> speculation with such an example is, at best, an exercise of futility -
th=
e socio-historical
> situation speaks for itself in the archives of Jewish history) the
righteo=
us Jews of the Second
> Temple period had taught the Seven Laws of Noah to the non-Jews, there
wou=
ld never have risen a
> religion such as Christianity. With the knowledge that (through the
observ=
ance of the Sheva
> Mitzvot B nei Noach) everlasting life could be attained as promised by
Has=
hem to Noach, the
> resulting fabrication that everlasting life could come only through
belief=
and wor****p of a
> human being would never have happened. Instead, as we have noted, the
teac=
hing concerning the
> Covenant of the Rainbow - The Covenant of Everlasting Life, had been
force=
d into hiding by the
> vicious persecution of the Jews, and the new covenant of Christianity
was =
but a pagan attempt
> to replace the eternal Covenant made by Hashem to Noach..."
http://tinyurl=
..com/67nlov
>
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+BwwBm3e3xt5ZyeODHwFqGgrG=
o5BowDarnwBrnDtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html#hit1
>
> "Sincerity - I am Abraham s Servant - [A] Jew is a son of G-d whereas a
no=
n-Jew is intended to
> be a servant of G-d. Although a Jew in essence is always a son, when he
do=
es not merit (to
> manifest the essence of his Divine soul) he is also referred to as a...
(4=
K) Excerpt: " With
> the advent of Ma****ach, all non-Jews will willfully serve (the Divine
purp=
ose of) the Jewish
> people. Here lies the essence of the clarification in the mind of the
non-=
Jew with regard to
> the identity of the true Ma****ach. As mentioned above, at present a very
l=
arge percentage of
> the non-Jewish world wor****ps an individual Jew as god. The non-Jewish
wor=
ld must come to
> recognize that all Jews are indeed sons of G-d. The non-Jew must strive
to=
serve and help
> G-d s children fulfill their purpose to bring redemption to the world.
The=
n will
> the true Ma****ach reveal himself." http://tinyurl.com/bzemy
>
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+YwwBmeoxN1elkmdqekzbtqg5=
d1camoVoDnaDdDe2DqxiaTw5rowqrtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html=
#hit1
>
> Does everyone get the gist of the phrase "all non-Jews will willfully
serv=
e (the Divine
> purpose of) the Jewish people" which is what they tried with their
communi=
sm.
>
> Perhaps this will make it clearer;
>
> "...Communism, despite its flaws and corruptions, has had a profound
effec=
t on our sense of
> social justice. Christianity, despite the horrendous atrocities it
perpetr=
ated and justified,
> played a major role in introducing, to a largely pagan world, the
concepts=
(though much
> adulterated) of a one, omnipotent and non- cor****eal G-d and of a
messiani=
c end-goal to
> existence."
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/63558/jewish/IV-=
Wheres-the-Truth.htm
>
> All of the above quoted from what Jewish Rebbes teach their nest of
serpen=
ts.
>
> More (downloadable) Talmudic hatred against non-Jews =3D gentiles =3D
heat=
hen =3D Cutheans =3D minim =3D
> goy =3D goyim
>
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/zarah/zarah_26.html
> Babylonian Talmud: Tractate =EF=BF=BDAbodah Zarah
> Folio 26a
> MISHNAH. AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT ACT AS MIDWIFE TO A HEATHEN
WOMAN, =
BECAUSE SHE WOULD BE
> DELIVERING A CHILD FOR IDOLATRY. A HEATHEN WOMAN, HOWEVER, MAY ACT AS
MIDW=
IFE TO AN ISRAELITE
> WOMAN. AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT SUCKLE THE CHILD OF A HEATHEN, BUT
A =
HEATHEN WOMAN MAY
> SUCKLE THE CHILD OF AN ISRAELITE WOMAN IN HER PREMISES.
>
> GEMARA. Our Rabbis taught: An Israelite woman should not act as midwife
to=
heathen, because she
> delivers a child to idolatry; nor may a heathen woman [be allowed to]
act =
as midwife to an
> Israelite woman because heathens are suspected of murder. This is the
opin=
ion of R. Meir. The
> Sages, however, say: A heathen may act as midwife to an Israelite woman
so=
long as there are
> others standing by, but not if she is acting on her own.5 But R. Meir
hol=
ds: Not even if
> others are standing by her, for she may find an op****tunity of pressing
he=
r hand on the
> [infant's] temples and kill it without being observed; witness the
inciden=
t of that woman who,
> on being called by a neighbour 'Jewish midwife, the daughter of a Jewish
m=
idwife!' retorted,
> 'May as many evils befall that woman, as I have dropped [Jewish
children] =
like lumps of wood
> into the river.' Our Rabbis, however, say: No; she may have merely given
h=
er some kind of
> retort.
>
> AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT SUCKLE etc. Our Rabbis taught: An
Israelite =
woman should not
> suckle a child of a heathen, because she rears a child for idolatry; nor
s=
hould a heathen woman
> [be allowed to] suckle a child of an Israelite woman, because she is
liabl=
e to murder it. This
> is the opinion of R. Meir. But the Sages say: A heathen may suckle a
child=
of an Israelite
> woman, so long as there are others standing by her, but not if she is on
h=
er own. R. Meir,
> however, says: Not even while others are standing by her, for she may
take=
the op****tunity of
> rubbing in poison on her breast beforehand and so kill the child. And
both=
the above instances
> are necessary; for if we were told about a midwife only [we might have
tho=
ught that] only in
> that case do the Sages permit, since, being observed by others, she
could =
do no harm, but in
> the case of suckling, where it is possible for her to apply poison to
the =
breast beforehand and
> so kill the child, they might agree with R. Meir. If [on the other hand]
w=
e were told only
> about suckling, [we might have thought that] only in that case does R.
Mei=
r forbid, because she
> could kill the child by applying poison to her breast beforehand, but in
t=
he case of a midwife,
> where she could do no harm while others are standing by her, he might
agre=
e with the Rabbis;
> [hence both are] necessary.
>
> The following was cited in contradiction: A Jewish woman may act as
midwif=
e to a heathen woman
> for payments but not gratuitously!...
>
> <STOP>
>
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/babakamma/babakamma_38.html
>
> Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Baba Kamma
> The same has been taught as follows: If the ox of an Israelite gores an
ox=
of a Canaanite there
> is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an
Israelite =
whether the ox [that
> did the damage] was Tam or whether it had already been Mu 'ad, the
payment=
is to be in full
>
> <STOP>
>
> Gentiles never have equality in the Jewish system of things.
>
> In closing here is what the Jewish Talmud teaches about Jesus and
deceased=
Christians.
>
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_56.html
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_57.html
> Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Gittin
> Folio 56b
> Onkelos son of Kolonikos20 was the son of Titus's sister. He had a mind
t=
o convert himself to
> Judaism. He went and raised Titus from the dead by magical arts, and
asked=
him; 'Who is most in
> repute in the [other] world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said,
about=
joining them? He
> said: Their observances are burdensome and you will not be able to carry
t=
hem out. Go and
> attack them in that world and you will be at the top as it is written,
Her=
adversaries are
> become the head21 etc.; whoever har***** Israel becomes head. He asked
hi=
m:
> Folio 57a
> What is your punishment [in the other world]? He replied: What I decreed
f=
or myself. Every day
> my ashes are collected and sentence is passed on me and I am burnt and
my =
ashes are scattered
> over the seven seas. He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He
as=
ked him: Who is in
> repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about
j=
oining them? He
> replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy
days=
for ever.1 He then
> asked: What is your punishment? He replied: With boiling hot semen.2 He
t=
hen went and raised
> by incantations the sinners of Israel.3 He asked them: Who is in repute
i=
n the other world?
> They replied: Israel. What about joining them? They replied: Seek their
we=
lfare, seek not their
> harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. He said: What
is =
your punishment? They
> replied: With boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever
mock=
s at the words of the
> Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement.
>
> Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
>
> 1 Deut. XXIII, 7.
> 2 Because he enticed Israel to go astray after the daughters of Moab.
V. =
Sanh. 106a.
> 3 [MS.M. Jesus].
>
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_106.html
> Sanh. 106a
> A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! =EF=BF=BD R. Johanan said: At first
he=
was a prophet, but
> subsequently a soothsayer.41 R. Papa observed: This is what men say,
'She=
who was the
> descendant of princes and governors, played the harlot with
carpenters.'42=
>
> Footnotes:
>
> 41 As a punishment for wi****ng to curse Israel he was degraded from a
pro=
phet to a soothsayer.
> 42 '****pdraggers,' (v. Ra****). Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p.
48,=
suggests that Balaam
> is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus (v. also pp.
64-70). =
Though no name is
> mentioned to shew which woman is meant, the mother of Jesus may be
alluded=
to, which theory is
> strengthened by the statement that she mated with a carpenter.
> Sanhedrin 106b
> Did the children of Israel slay with the sword among them that were
s=
lain by them.1 Rab
> said: They subjected him to four deaths, stoning, burning, decapitation
an=
d strangulation.2
> A certain min3 said to R. Hanina: Hast thou heard how old Balaam was?
=
=EF=BF=BD He replied: It is not
> actually stated, but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall
n=
ot live out half
> their days,4 [it follows that] he was thirty-three or thirty-four years
o=
ld.5 He rejoined:
> Thou hast said correctly; I personally have seen Balaam's Chronicle, in
wh=
ich it is stated,
> 'Balaam the lame was thirty years old when Phinehas the Robber killed
him.=
'6
>
> Footnotes:
>
> 6 [According to the view that all the Balaam passages are
anti-Christian =
in tendency, Balaam
> being used as an alias for Jesus, Phinehas the Robber is thus taken to
rep=
resent Pontius
> Pilatus, and the Chronicle of Balaam probably to denote a Gospel (v.
Herfo=
rd op. cit. 72ff.).
> This view is however disputed by Bacher and others: cf. Ginzberg,
Journal =
of Biblical
> Literature, XLI, 121.]
>
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_107.html
> Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin
> Folio 107a
>
> Footnotes:
>
> II Kings V, 27. The uncensored edition continues: What of R. Joshua b.
Per=
ahjah? =EF=BF=BD When King
> Jannai slew our Rabbis, R. Joshua b. Perahjah (and Jesus) fled to
Alexandr=
ia of Egypt. On the
> resumption of peace, Simeon b. Shetach sent to him: 'From me,
(Jerusalem) =
the holy city, to
> thee, Alexandria of Egypt (my sister). My husband dwelleth within thee
and=
I am desolate.' He
> arose, went, and found himself in a certain inn, where great honour was
sh=
ewn him. 'How
> beautiful is this Acsania!' (The word denotes both inn and innkeeper. R.
J=
oshua used it in the
> first sense; the answer assumes the second to be meant.) Thereupon
(Jesus)=
observed, 'Rabbi,
> her eyes are narrow.' 'Wretch,' he rebuked him, 'dost thou thus engage
thy=
self.' He sounded
> four hundred trumpets and excommunicated him. He (Jesus) came before him
m=
any times pleading,
> 'Receive me!' But he would pay no heed to him. One day he (R. Joshua)
was =
reciting the Shema',
> when Jesus came before him. He intended to receive him and made a sign
to =
him. He (Jesus)
> thinking that it was to repel him, went, put up a brick, and wor****pped
it=
.. 'Repent,' said he
> (R. Joshua) to him. He replied, 'I have thus learned from thee: He who
sin=
s and causes others
> to sin is not afforded the means of repentance.' And a Master has said,
'J=
esus the Nazarene
> practised magic and led Israel astray.' For a full discussion of this
pass=
age and attempted
> explanation of this anachronism making Jesus a contem****ary of King
Jannai=
(104-78 B.C.E.). v.
> Herford, op. cit. 51ff. [The tradition of an early Jesus was also known
to=
Epiphanius. Whether
> he derived this tradition from the Talmud or from an independent source
is=
a moot point hotly
> contested by Klausner and Guttmann; v. MGWJ. 1931, 250ff. and 1933, 38.
In=
any case there does
> not appear to be sufficient data available to account for this
tradition.]=
>
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt01.html
>
> from The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
> by Elizabeth Dilling
>
> I.
> THE PHARISEES, THE TALMUD,
> AND MODERN JUDAISM
>
> Bible scholars are aware that Jesus Christ denounced the Pharisees. He
sai=
d they nullified all
> the Commandments of God by their Tradition, "teaching for doctrines the
co=
mmandments of men"
> (Mark 7:13; Matt. 15:6-9, etc.). His invective, in truth, cannot be
equall=
ed. All of Matthew 23
> is like a whiplash. He likened Pharisaism to a whited sepulchre, indeed
be=
autiful outwardly,
> but "inside full of dead men's bones and of all uncleanness." Christ
clima=
xed one condemnation
> after another with the expletive, "Hypocrites!" He called the Pharisees
ch=
ildren of them that
> killed the Prophets. He foretold they would go on killing, crucifying
and =
persecuting until the
> guilt for all the righteous blood shed from Abel on down would be upon
the=
m. "Ye serpents, ye
> generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" Christ
ask=
ed.
> Christ is as utterly devastating of Pharisaism in the record of John 8.
Al=
though He admitted
> that His hearers were descendants of Abraham, He said they were,
spiritual=
ly, of the devil.
> Christ told them:
>
> Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will
do. =
He was a murderer
> from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because the truth is not
i=
n him. When he
> speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father
of=
it (John 8:44).
> The Missing Link
> "But," says the disinterested Christian, "what has that to do with us
toda=
y? What a group of
> Pharisees did two thousand years ago is over and done with!"
>
> However, the missing link in Christian understanding on the subject of
"Ph=
arisees" is best
> supplied by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943):
>
> The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break,
th=
rough all the
> centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found
expre=
ssion in a literature
> of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence.
The =
Talmud is the largest
> and most im****tant single piece of that literature =EF=BF=BD and the
study=
of it is essential for any
> real understanding of Pharisaism.
>
> Concerning the Pharisees, the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia says:
>
> With the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.) the Sadducees disappeared
alt=
ogether, leaving the
> regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees.
Henceforth=
, Jewish life was
> regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was
reconstructed=
from the Pharisaic
> point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past.
A =
new chain of
> tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition (Abot 1:1). Pharisaism
s=
haped the character
> of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future. (See
Ex=
hibit 264 herein.)
> Historically speaking, scripture believers had accepted Christ as the
Mess=
iah foretold. They
> were no longer "Jews," but called themselves "Christians." They were
perse=
cuted as such by the
> Pharisees. The word "Pharisee" comes from the word "separated." (See
Exhib=
it 300.)
>
> The Babylonian Talmud, Sole Authority
>
> You may ascertain by turning to top Jewish authorities today that the
Baby=
lonian Talmud, the
> written form of the Tradition of the Pharisees, is the sole authority of
t=
he so-called "Jewish"
> religion, or Judaism.
>
> Rabbi Louis Finklestein was chosen in 1937 by the Kehillas (Jewish
communi=
ties) of the World as
> one of the top 120 Jews best representing "a lamp of Judaism" to the
World=
, together with Maxim
> Litvinov (Finklestein), the Communist Commissar and bank robber
terrorist;=
atheist communist
> Albert Einstein; those indefatigable Marxist reds, Harold Laski and his
fr=
iend Felix
> Frankfurter (U.S. Supreme Court Justice) who shared honors with Rabbi
Fink=
lestein and others.
> Finklestein has long headed the Jewish Theological Seminary of America,
wi=
th branches in New
> York and Los Angeles. In his two-volume work "The Pharisees." Rabbi
Finkle=
stein writes:
>
> Pharasaism became Talmudism =EF=BF=BD But the spirit of the ancient
Pharis=
ee survives unaltered. When
> the Jew =EF=BF=BD studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the
argumen=
ts used in the Palestinian
> academies. From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa,
It=
aly. Spain, France
> and Germany; from these to Poland. Russia and Eastern Europe generally,
an=
cient Pharasaism has
> wandered. (See Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, and Exhibit 3 herein.)
> In Rabbi Finklestein's history of the Jews, he states:
>
> The Talmud derives its authority from the position held by the ancient
aca=
demies. (i.e.
> Pharisee) The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of
Palest=
ine. were considered
> the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin . . . At the present
time, =
the Jewish people
> have no living central authority comparable in status to the ancient
Sanhe=
drins or the later
> academies. Therefore, any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be
b=
ased on the Talmud as
> the final resum=EF=BF=BD of the teaching of those authorities when they
ex=
isted.
> [page 2] (The Jews =EF=BF=BD Their History, Culture, and Religion , Vol.
4=
, p. 1332, Jewish Publication
> Society of America, 1949).
> "The Talmud: Heart's Blood of the Jewish Faith," was the heading of a
Nove=
mber, 1959,
> installment of a bestselling book by the Jewish author, Herman Wouk,
which=
ran serially in the
> New York Herald-Tribune.
>
> To quote:
>
> The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jewish
reli=
gion. Whatever laws,
> customs or ceremonies we observe =EF=BF=BD whether we are Orthodox,
Conser=
vative, Reform or merely
> spasmodic sentimentalists =EF=BF=BD we follow the Talmud. It is our
common=
law.
> Why Was It So Often Burned?
> Why is the Talmud kept so unknown to non-Jews? Why was there no usable
Eng=
lish translation of
> the Talmud until the Soncino Edition, 1934-48? Why, in European history,
w=
hen the laws of the
> Talmud became commonly known, was it burned over and over by order of
the =
Popes, excoriated by
> Martin Luther, denounced everywhere, and its followers exiled from one
cou=
ntry after another
> down through the centuries?
>
> The Talmud's basic law is that only the Pharisee Jew ranks as a man, or
hu=
man being. All others
> rank as animals, "the people who are like an ass =EF=BF=BD slaves who
are =
considered the property of
> the master." The attitude resulting from such teachings has been
resented =
by non-Jews in all
> countries and centuries. Such resentment, however, is always ****trayed
by =
Jews as "persecution
> of the Jews."
>
> Moses, on the contrary, was most insistent upon having one law for the
str=
anger and for the
> "home-born" and in teaching that the stranger must not be oppressed.
(Exod=
us 12:49; Lev. 24:22,
> Num. 9:14; 15:15-16, 29, etc.) In fact, he ordered: "Love ye therefore
the=
stranger; for ye
> were strangers in the land of Egypt." (Deu. 10:19) It was only the
abomina=
tors he warned
> against.
>
> Babylonian Talmud =EF=BF=BD The Law
>
> The Babylonian Talmud is the law for so-called Judaism. However, its
****o=
graphic, anti-Gentile
> and anti-Christian doctrines have often caused hostility against it. It
ma=
y then be argued by
> some Jews that there is a Palestinian Talmud which is innocuous.
Neverthel=
ess, you may look up
> the fact that Jewish authorities state it was lost for a thousand years,
h=
as missing parts and
> lacks the "Gemara" and other essentials, and is only used as a scholar's
c=
uriosity. Note the
> statement of British Chief Rabbi Hertz in his foreword to the Soncino
edit=
ion of the Babylonian
> Talmud (Exhibit 33):
>
> The Palestinian Talmud =EF=BF=BD was for many centuries almost forgotten
b=
y Jewry. Its legal decisions
> were at no time deemed to possess validity, if opposed by the Babylonian
T=
almud.
> Was Christ Just to Pharisees?
>
> Without some knowledge of the written form of the "Tradition of the
Pharis=
ees," the Babylonian
> Talmud, one is unable to intelligently judge whether Jesus Christ was
fair=
and just in His acid
> denunciations of Pharisaism, or not. One needs proof, offered by the
irref=
utable exhibits from
> Jewish authorities (set forth elsewhere herein) that the Talmud reverses
e=
very one of the Ten
> Commandments, the teachings of Moses and the Prophets, and enshrines
their=
opposites under a
> "whited sepulchre" which is a disguise for murder and "all uncleanness,"
a=
s Christ charged.
> Murder of non-Pharisees is always permitted; theft, sodomy, *****, rape
a=
re all permitted. For
> example, the righteousness of grown men violating baby girls under three
i=
s a favorite topic
> for discussion in book after book of the Talmud.
>
> Talmudic literature is one long paean of praise for the very name
Babylon,=
and all that it
> means to Babylonian Talmudism today, whereas it is a term of reproach in
O=
ld and New
> Testaments.
>
> Note the Foreword to the first English translation of the Babylonian
Talmu=
d by the late Chief
> Rabbi of Great Britain, J.H. Hertz, who, like Rabbi Finklestein, was one
o=
f the 120 Jews chosen
> in 1937 by the Kehillas of the World as best holding up the "lamp of
Judai=
sm:"
>
> The beginnings of Talmudic literature date back to the time of the
Babylon=
ian Exile in the
> Sixth pre-Christian Century =EF=BF=BD When a thousand years later, the
Bab=
ylonian Talmud assumed final
> codified form in the year 500 after the Christian era, the Roman Western
E=
mpire had ceased to
> be. (See Exhibit 30).
>
> Rabbi Hertz extolls the Babylonian Exile, saying: "The Babylonian Exile
is=
a momentous period =EF=BF=BD
> During that Exile Israel found itself. It =EF=BF=BD rediscovered the
Torah=
and made it the rule of life
> =EF=BF=BD"
>
> What he really means is that it was discovered how the Torah or Bible
coul=
d be used as a
> "whited sepulchre" for Babylonian degeneracy, as even a cursory study
will=
reveal.
>
> One Rabbi Akiba was a First Century Talmud "sage," of whom Moses was
even =
supposedly jealous!
> (See Exhibit 32). Rabbi Hertz lauds Rabbi Akiba (Exhibit 32):
>
> Akiba was the author of a collection of traditional laws out of which
the =
Mishna actually grew.
> He was the greatest among the rabbis of his own and of succeeding times
=
=EF=BF=BD His keen and
> penetrating intellect enabled him to find a Biblical basis for every
provi=
sion of the Oral Law.
> Still enthusing over the Babylonian derivation of Pharisaism, Rabbi
Hertz =
continues (See
> Exhibit 34):
>
> When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealing with what most
peopl=
e understand when
> they speak or write of the Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an
auton=
omous Jewish center
> for a longer period than any other land; namely from soon after 586
before=
the Christian era to
> the year 1040 after the Christian Era =EF=BF=BD 1626 years. (Exhibit 34)
> [page 3] You will note in reproductions of Talmud pages that the word
"Gem=
ara" designates the
> argumentation of the rabbis, the ultimate decision being summarized as
the=
"Mishnah."
>
> Bible Versus Oral Law (Talmud)
>
> The Bible under Talmudic Judaism is considered to be a collection of
simpl=
e tales fit only for
> fools, women and children. The Talmud "sages" thus must find new
meanings =
in it by letter and
> number tricks which reverse the plain meaning and create out of it the
per=
mission to do
> otherwise forbidden crimes and misdeeds. The words of the Bible are
contin=
ually misused and
> misquoted for purposes of blasphemy and reversal.
>
> Stealing for themselves the title of "Israelites," the Talmud "sages"
teac=
h that "God made a
> covenant with Israel only for the sake of that which was transmitted
orall=
y." (See Exhibit 60)
> And the Biblical "basis" of this is given as Exodus 34:27. But that
verse =
states, instead: "And
> the Lord said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of
t=
hese words I have
> made a covenant with thee and with Israel" =EF=BF=BD the opposite!
(Talmud=
, Gittin 60b, See Exhibit
> 204) The Talmudic reversal of Moses' written words are said to have been
t=
ransmitted "orally,"
> and through Moses himself =EF=BF=BD believe it or not!
>
> Bearing in mind that the Scribes were the Pharisee teachers of the Law
of =
Moses, carefully
> distorted to comprise the Talmud, note: "There is greater stringency in
re=
spect to the
> teachings of the Scribes than in respect to the Torah =EF=BF=BD so that
a =
Biblical law may be
> transgressed." (Talmud, Sanhedrin 88b, see Exhibit 95).
>
> The Torah in its narrow sense is the Old Testament, and in a still
narrowe=
r meaning the first
> five books (Pentateuch) of Moses. In its wider Judaistic use it means
the =
Old Testament as
> misinterpreted by the Pharisaic Talmud. Always with Judaism the Talmud
ran=
ks above the Bible in
> every way.
>
> Not reproduced here is a Talmud passage from the book of Nedarim (vows)
of=
which Exhibit 170 is
> the title page. The Soncino edition of the Talmud states (page 107):
>
> As will be seen on 37a, Scripture was generally regarded as the study of
c=
hildren only, adults
> usually investigating the deeper meaning =EF=BF=BD From this we see that
i=
t was usual to teach the
> Bible to girls in spite of the Talmudic deduction that daughters need
not =
be educated (Kid.
> 30a). The opposition of Rabbi Eliezer to teaching the Torah to one's
daugh=
ter (Sotah 20a "He
> who teaches his daughter Torah is as though he taught her lewdness.")
was =
probably directed
> against the teaching of the Oral Law, and the higher branches of study
(V.=
Maimonides Yad.
> Talmud Torah) =EF=BF=BD The context shows that the reference is to the
hig=
her knowledge of Biblical
> law.
>
> The Talmud (Sanhedrin 59a, See Exhibit 60), states:
>
> A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death for it is written, Moses
co=
mmanded us a law for
> an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs.
> Reference is also made to the "Noachian laws" which the non-Jew may
study =
"but not laws which
> do not pertain to them." Also: " =EF=BF=BD (the) objection was to the
stud=
ying of the Oral Law =EF=BF=BD Rabbi
> Johanan feared the knowledge of Gentiles in matters of Jurisprudence, as
t=
hey would use it
> against the Jews in their opponents' courts." Understandably, since all
Ta=
lmud laws
> discriminate against the non-Jew and rank him a virtual animal, these
were=
apt observations.
>
> The Jewish Encyclopedia is still more open about what is in Sanhedrin
59a =
of the Talmud, above,
> threatening death for revelation of "Torah" laws to Gentiles: "for such
kn=
owledge might have
> operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts." This observation
fo=
llows a dissertation
> on the laws on cheating and getting the best of Gentiles in trade and in
c=
ourt. (See Exhibit
> 271, left column)
|
