Re: pope RAT-singer says he's ashamed of pedo-priests. But is he really?
by 2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(•R. L. Measures)
Apr 16, 2008 at 09:54 PM
In article
<2f2fec85-9e4c-41f2-b3cc-aa4947c10d87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Fr.
Pedo Priest" <your_pedo_priest@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 10:29=A0am, 2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(=95R. L. Measures) wrote:
> >
> > =95 =A0Cardinal Law's sin was one of omission, not one of commission -
>
> He knew the pedo-priest had molested a child and transferred him to
> another area to avoid prosecution - this is omission not commission?
>
> What am I missing here?
** Is that a crime?
>
> Hopes about a cure for pedophilia be damned - the pedo-priest had
> broken the law and violated a child. And had confesserd about doing
> so.
>
> And the cardinal obstructed justice by transferring the slime-ball out
> of the diocese.
>
> Omission?
>
> Clearly I'm the one missing the point here.
--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
