In article <re9c045tum0ofirg7uo53jh4elir5saqat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, duke
<duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:29:10 -0700, 2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(•R. L. Measures) wrote:
>
> >In article <ehrb04lu6ekr6o261ococtn11qb8ld3ev6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, duke
> ><duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:30:28 -0700 (PDT), "Fr. Pedo Priest"
> >> <your_pedo_priest@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Then why hasn't he asked cardinal Law to come back to the US and
meet
> >> >with the authorities in Boston and answer a few basic questions? Oh
> >> >now I remember - Law hasn't been accused of anything - right?
> >>
> >> There you go.
> >>
> >• Cardinal Law's sin was one of omission, not one of commission -
> >primarily because he was under the wrong impression that pedophilia
> >priests could be cured of their disorder .
>
> Ok, no law breaking, pardon the pun.
>
• chortle
--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
|
