Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Presbyterian > Obama's Speech
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 4 Topic 5676 of 5756
Post > Topic >>

Obama's Speech

by **Rowland Croucher** <rccroucher@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 19, 2008 at 10:48 AM

The following is a transcript of Sen. Barack Obama's speech, as provided 
by Obama's campaign, (in response to controversial comments by his 
ex-pastor).

We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.

Sen. Barack Obama has said the controversy over his ex-pastor's remarks 
has been "a distraction" to the campaign.

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across 
the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, 
launched America's improbable experiment in democracy.

Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an 
ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their 
declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted 
through the spring of 1787.

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately 
unfinished. It was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery, a 
question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a 
stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue 
for at least 20 more years, and to leave any final resolution to future 
generations.

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded 
within our Constitution -- a Constitution that had at its very core the 
ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised 
its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be 
perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from 
bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full 
rights and obligations as citizens of the United States.

What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were 
willing to do their part -- through protests and struggle, on the 
streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience 
and always at great risk -- to narrow that gap between the promise of 
our ideals and the reality of their time.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign 
-- to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a 
more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America.

I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I 
believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we 
solve them together -- unless we perfect our union by understanding that 
we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not 
look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all 
want to move in the same direction -- towards a better future for our 
children and our grandchildren.

This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity 
of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I 
was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a 
Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II and a white 
grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth 
while he was overseas.

I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the 
world's poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries 
within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners -- an inheritance we pass 
on to our two precious daughters.

I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every 
race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long 
as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my 
story even possible.

It's a story that hasn't made me the most conventional candidate. But it 
is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this 
nation is more than the sum of its parts -- that out of many, we are 
truly one.

Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to 
the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this 
message of unity.

Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial 
lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest 
populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate 
Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African-Americans and 
white Americans.

This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At 
various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either 
"too black" or "not black enough."

We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the 
South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the 
latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and 
black, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the 
discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive
turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my 
candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action, that it's based 
solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial 
reconciliation on the cheap.

On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, 
use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not 
only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the 
greatness and the goodness of our nation -- that rightly offend white 
and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Rev. 
Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions 
remain.

Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic 
and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that 
could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I 
strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely -- just 
as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests or 
rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply 
controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak 
out against perceived injustice.

Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country -- a 
view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong 
with America above all that we know is right with America, a view that 
sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions 
of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse 
and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Rev. Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, 
divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when 
we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems -- two 
wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care 
crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are 
neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that 
confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, 
there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are 
not enough. Why associate myself with Rev. Wright in the first place, 
they may ask? Why not join another church?

And I confess that if all that I knew of Rev. Wright were the snippets 
of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and 
YouTube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the 
caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I 
would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met 
more than 20 years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian 
faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; 
to care for the sick and lift up the poor.

He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine, who has studied and 
lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the 
country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the 
community by doing God's work here on Earth -- by housing the homeless, 
ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships 
and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, "Dreams From My Father," I described the experience of 
my first service at Trinity:

"People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a 
forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters....And 
in that single note -- hope! -- I heard something else; at the foot of 
that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined 
the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David 
and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den, 
Ezekiel's field of dry bones.

"Those stories -- of survival, and freedom, and hope -- became our 
story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our 
tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a 
vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a 
larger world.

"Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and 
more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave 
us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't need to feel shame 
about...memories that all people might study and cherish -- and with 
which we could start to rebuild."

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black 
churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its 
entirety -- the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the 
former gang-banger.

Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous 
laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, 
screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear.

The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce 
intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, 
the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black 
experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Rev. Wright. As 
imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened 
my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children.

Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any 
ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he 
interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within 
him the contradictions -- the good and the bad -- of the community that 
he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no 
more disown him than I can my white grandmother -- a woman who helped 
raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who 
loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who 
once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, 
and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic 
stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this 
country that I love.

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are 
simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the 
politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just 
hope that it fades into the woodwork.

We can dismiss Rev. Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have 
dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, 
as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore 
right now. We would be making the same mistake that Rev. Wright made in 
his offending sermons about America -- to simplify and stereotype and 
amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.

The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that 
have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race 
in this country that we've never really worked through -- a part of our 
union that we have yet to perfect.

And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective 
corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges 
like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every 
American.

Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this 
point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried. 
In fact, it isn't even past." We do not need to recite here the history 
of racial injustice in this country.

But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that 
exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to 
inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under 
the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't 
fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the 
inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the 
pervasive achievement gap between today's black and white students.

Legalized discrimination -- where blacks were prevented, often through 
violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to 
African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access 
FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, 
or fire departments -- meant that black families could not amass any 
meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations.

That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and 
white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many 
of today's urban and rural communities.

A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and 
frustration that came from not being able to provide for one's family, 
contributed to the erosion of black families -- a problem that welfare 
policies for many years may have worsened.

And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods -- 
parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage 
pick-up and building code enforcement -- all helped create a cycle of 
violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.

This is the reality in which Rev. Wright and other African-Americans of 
his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early 
sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and 
opportunity was systematically constricted.

What's remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, 
but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able 
to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.

But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of 
the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it -- those who were 
ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination.

That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations -- those young 
men and, increasingly, young women who we see standing on street corners 
or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. 
Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, 
continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways.

For the men and women of Rev. Wright's generation, the memories of 
humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and 
the bitterness of those years.

That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers 
or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the 
kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin 
up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician's own
failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the 
pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to 
hear that anger in some of Rev. Wright's sermons simply reminds us of 
the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on 
Sunday morning.

That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts 
attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing 
our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American 
community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change.

But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to 
condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the 
chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. 
Most working- and middle-class white Americans don't feel that they have 
been particularly privileged by their race.

Their experience is the immigrant experience -- as far as they're 
concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch. 
They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs 
shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor.

They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping 
away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity 
comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my 
expense.

So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; 
when they hear that an African-American is getting an advantage in 
landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice 
that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears 
about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment 
builds over time.

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren't 
always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the 
political landscape for at least a generation.

Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan 
Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own 
electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built 
entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing 
legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere 
political correctness or reverse racism.

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white 
resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the 
middle-class squeeze -- a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, 
questionable accounting practices and short-term greed; a Washington 
dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that 
favor the few over the many.

And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them 
as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in 
legitimate concerns -- this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the 
path to understanding.

This is where we are right now. It's a racial stalemate we've been stuck 
in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and 
white, I have never been so naive as to believe that we can get beyond 
our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single 
candidacy -- particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.

But I have asserted a firm conviction -- a conviction rooted in my faith 
in God and my faith in the American people -- that working together we 
can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have 
no choice if we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the 
burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means 
continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of 
American life.

But it also means binding our particular grievances -- for better health 
care, and better schools, and better jobs -- to the larger aspirations 
of all Americans, the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, 
the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his
family.

And it means taking full responsibility for own lives -- by demanding 
more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and 
reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges 
and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to 
despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their 
own destiny.

Ironically, this quintessentially American -- and yes, conservative -- 
notion of self-help found frequent expression in Rev. Wright's sermons. 
But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that 
embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society 
can change.

The profound mistake of Rev. Wright's sermons is not that he spoke about 
racism in our society. It's that he spoke as if our society was static; 
as if no progress has been made; as if this country -- a country that 
has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest 
office in the land and build a coalition of white and black, Latino and 
Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a 
tragic past.

But what we know -- what we have seen -- is that America can change. 
That is the true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved 
gives us hope -- the audacity to hope -- for what we can and must 
achieve tomorrow.

In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means 
acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not 
just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of 
discrimination -- and current incidents of discrimination, while less 
overt than in the past -- are real and must be addressed.

Not just with words, but with deeds -- by investing in our schools and 
our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring 
fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation 
with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous
generations.

It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to 
come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare 
and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help 
all of America prosper.

In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, 
than what all the world's great religions demand -- that we do unto 
others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, 
Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that 
common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect 
that spirit as well.

For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that 
breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as 
spectacle -- as we did in the O.J. trial -- or in the wake of tragedy, 
as we did in the aftermath of Katrina -- or as fodder for the nightly
news.

We can play Rev. Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk 
about them from now until the election, and make the only question in 
this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow 
believe or sympathize with his most offensive words.

We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that 
she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men 
will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his 
policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking 
about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another 
one. And nothing will change.

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come 
together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the 
crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and 
white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native 
American children.

This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids 
can't learn; that those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's 
problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, 
and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st Century economy. Not this 
time.

This time we want to talk about how the lines in the emergency room are 
filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care, 
who don't have the power on their own to overcome the special interests 
in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.

This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a 
decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that 
once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk 
of life.

This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not 
that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's that 
the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than 
a profit.

This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and 
creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under 
the same proud flag.

We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never 
should've been authorized and never should've been waged, and we want to 
talk about how we'll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their 
families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

I would not be running for president if I didn't believe with all my 
heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this 
country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after 
generation has shown that it can always be perfected.

And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this 
possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation -- the 
young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have 
already made history in this election.

There is one story in particularly that I'd like to leave you with today 
-- a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King's 
birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.

There is a young, 23-year-old white woman named Ashley Baia who 
organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been 
working to organize a mostly African-American community since the 
beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable 
discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they 
were there.

And Ashley said that when she was 9 years old, her mother got cancer. 
And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her 
health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that's when Ashley 
decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley 
convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat 
more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that 
was the cheapest way to eat.

She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone 
at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that 
she could help the millions of other children in the country who want 
and need to help their parents, too.

Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her 
along the way that the source of her mother's problems were blacks who 
were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into 
the country illegally. But she didn't. She sought out allies in her 
fight against injustice.

Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks 
everyone else why they're supporting the campaign. They all have 
different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And 
finally they come to this elderly black man who's been sitting there 
quietly the entire time.

And Ashley asks him why he's there. And he does not bring up a specific 
issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say 
education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of 
Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, "I am here because 
of Ashley."

"I'm here because of Ashley." By itself, that single moment of 
recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not 
enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the 
jobless, or education to our children.

But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as 
so many generations have come to realize over the course of the 
two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that 
document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

March 19, 2008

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/18/obama.transcript/index.html

****

Beliefnet's Washington Editor, David Kuo; Politics Editor, Dan Gilgoff
and Beliefnet Editor in Chief and author of the new book FOUNDING FAITH:
Providence, Politics and the Birth of Religious Freedom in America and
other bloggers are weighing in on Senator Obama's "A More Perfect Union"
speech today.  Please check out the Casting Stones blog for updates
(www.beliefnet.com/castingstones ).

Here's a quick rundown of pre-speech posts and points of view:

-- David Kuo: Obama's decision to stand by his church is good
Spirituality "He didn't forego his spiritual home for political
convenience.  Whether or not that is good politics is yet to be seen.
That it is good spiritually should be applauded."

--  Steven Waldman: Obama can't be held responsible for all Wright's
statements, but he needs to say where he agrees and disagrees.

"Some stay because the Sunday school is terrific. More commonly, I hear
people say something like, "I don't like the minister's sermons, but he
was so wonderful when my father died." We should remember that the main

purpose of a minister is spiritual. If he helps someone get closer to
God, or find meaning, that matters tremendously."

-- Dan Gilgoff (God-o-Meter): With Trinity UCC lashing out at the media
this weekend, this controversy is sticking around for a while.

"One of the main arguments Obama's surrogates have been making in the
face of the Wright flare-up is that voters want to hear about issues
like health care and the economy, not about the ravings of Obama's
pastor. This weekend's ravings from the church are fuel to the fire,
promising the story ain't going anywhere soon."

-- Rod Dreher: Rev. Jeremiah Wright is no MLK:  "Martin Luther King....
was a true prophet, in the Old Testament sense,

who did not damn America, but called her to be true to herself. It's
easy to imagine King denouncing the grave sins of this country, because
he did that. It's impossible to imagine him denouncing this country in
the fanatical terms used by Jeremiah Wright. Had he done so, we would be
living in a different country today, and a worse one.

--  Jim Wallis: This controversy is all about race, not religion.

"There is a deep well of both frustration and anger in the African
American community in the U.S. And those feelings are borne of the
concrete experience of real oppression, discrimination, and blocked
opportunities that most of America's white citizens take for granted....

In 2008, to still not comprehend or seek to understand the reality of
black frustration and anger is to be in a state of white denial which,
very sadly, is where many white Americans are."
-- 


Shalom/Salaam/Pax!                         Rowland Croucher

http://jmm.aaa.net.au/
  (20,000 articles 4000 humor)

Blogs - http://rowlandsblogs.blogspot.com/

Justice for Dawn Rowan - http://dawnrowansaga.blogspot.com/

Funny Jokes and Pics - http://funnyjokesnpics.blogspot.com/




 4 Posts in Topic:
Obama's Speech
**Rowland Croucher** <  2008-03-19 10:48:05 
Re: Obama's Speech
"jwsheffield@[EMAIL   2008-03-18 21:16:53 
Re: Obama's Speech
"Reuben Hick" &  2008-03-19 21:01:59 
Here is a paragraph from Obama's speech on Jeremiah Wright today
"jwsheffield@[EMAIL   2008-03-18 22:01:15 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 22:17:09 CDT 2008.