"David Morgan (MAMS)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:AoKCj.420$i54.194@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:ksICj.6268$6J3.5503@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "David Morgan (MAMS)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:2NyCj.381$sw3.37@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > "Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote...
>> >
>> >> Tell you what. Let's do a little experiment here....
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 5 companies (well, 6 really) control *ALL* of the media that you see
or
>> > hear in the United States.
>
>> So what?
>
> You like the word "control" don't you? I can tell by your speaking
> manner.
Why even bother to point to my speaking manner? You can "tell" just by
pulling it out of thin air, and you justify it with a bunch of
hand-waving,
as you've amply demonstrated below with your "defense" of your allegation
that all media in America is censored by the government and dominated by
far
right-wing politicos!
Have a nice life. There's no arguing with a fool who's impressed with his
own fact free imaginings.
Chuck
>
>> You're making allegations about content and censor****p,
>
> That's my point, yes. The lack thereof is also an implied definition
> of 'liberal' re****ting.
>
>> not distribution and share price.
>
> Who the heck cares about share prices besides the money lenders and
> gamblers who are the very one's vollying for your pocketbook by way
> of the brainwa****ng.
>
>> Let me ask you something, Daivd: are you a citizen of the US, and if
so,
>> for
>> how long?
>
> That's quite irrelevant.... I have two eyes, a brain, and can see what's
> happening to this nation, thanks to the cor****ate Coup D'Etat of 2000.
>
>> The reason I ask is we have this thing called a Constitution,
>
> As I said... completely irrelevant other than to make your long-winded
> dissertation appear to be 'patriotic' rather than in sup****t of the
> fascist
> regime now controlling this nation.... Yiou can take my family's rather
> lengthy presence in the USA (pre Boston Tea Party), and place it
squarely
> where the sun doesn't ****ne. Your implication here is beneath you....
> at least it *should* be.
>
>> and this group of men called the Supreme Court of the United States.
>
> Yes.... the same 'stacked deck' (SCOTUS) that brought you George W.
> Bush and the first unchallenged Coup D'Etat to occur in the USA.
>
>> There's also fifty
>> independent state governments, each with their own constitutions
>> (guaranteeing freedom of speech!) and their State Supreme Courts.
>
> Seen any big protests in state capitols lately?
>
>> You're seriously suggesting that six large American companies are being
>> censored by the Federal government,
>
> That they are voluntarily complicit in the dictator****p, or censored...
> yes.
>
> ALL media is censored in a <cough-cough> time of "war."
>
>> and these fifty state governments are
>> just going along for the ride, their governors, entire legislatures,
and
>> courts keeping mum.
>
> I'm suggesting that the mechanism which controls them is bigger than
> their sum total of effectiveness to combat it's presence.
>
>> The really sad part of this is I don't think you can
>> see how crack-brained that really is.
>
> Your argument is beginning to falter, Chuck. As a matter of fact,
you're
> just one step in front of beginning to call names and throw accusations
> rather than to assert any valid points addressing the contrary.
>
>> You've been percolating in the
>> poisonous stew of liberal thinking for so long your brain has turned to
>> complete mush,
>
> Like I said..... pretty worthless debate. Your objective here isn't to
do
> anything at all but provoke me.... a pretty old line of braindead crap.
>
>> so that now you'll believe anything...I mean anything,
>
> I fail to see that you're presenting any evidence to the contrary....
this
> is innuendo and unfounded. Sorry.... not admissable as argument.
>
>> ...no matter how insane it is.
>
> Ho-hum........ getting sleepy.... veeeery sleeepy......
>
>> You're letting your hatreds and petty biases lead
>> you around by the nose,
>
> I'm letting my eyes see beyond my nose and my brain evaluate what I see.
>
>> and I bet you can't even remember the last time you
>> actually critically examined a political statement or policy.
>
> What the devil does this have to do with our discussion?
>
>> If you believe the media is being censored by the government, David,
why
>> don't you sue them in court? Charge them with violating the First
>> Amendment
>> of the United States Constitution.
>
> I am... thank you. In any way that I can, every time that I can.
>
> I have already signed several petitions for suit aimed at both the
> mainstream
> media and the Federal Government. Please.... why don't you sign a few
as
> well? Here's a good place for you to start....
> http://www.petitiononline.com/6725/petition.html
>
>
> Several of them have worked quite well.... and if you care
> to join in, here are some results of the settlements paid by
> the media.
> http://www.medialaw.org/Template.cfm?Section=News
>
> This do NOT change the way they do business... it simply puts a scratch
> on their quite solid and well sup****ted bank accounts.
>
> Join a few suits though.... c'mon.... help us get our nation back....
> http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_media_san_jose.html
>
>> I know you've probably never read it in your life,
>
> You know something, Chuck.... you're just DYING to rial me up, so
> why don't I go ahead and ask you now to kiss my ass... you hot air
> filled, presumptive twit.
>
>
>> But you won't do it.
>
> Like I said.... I already am, and there are better places to waste my
> energy
> than scrapping with right-tard sup****ters of the US global hegemony.
>
> Actually... the US government is having a hay-day suing Bloggers to
> prevent real news from being available, and censoring foreign media
> from cable television access in the USA.
>
> And you think *I* should file suit against the media by myself.... what
> a childish approach to self defense. Single voices don't work very
> well in a dictator****p, Charles.
>
>> And we both know why: because you can't find a single
>> government employee, federal or state, who is "censoring" the news.
>
> Given what you say next, I can only assume that you're a blithering
idiot,
> or a paid political pundit. One normally doesn't stoop so low so early
in
> conversation, so I must assume that I've struck a nerve with you and
> your line of super-dooper sup****t for the takeover of the USA.
>
>> Of course, being the liberal loon you are,
>
> I know you want this badly... so here it is.... "Screw you."
>
> There... feel better? Do you think you've 'stimulated' me and
> created an adverse reaction, thus making you holier than thou
> and somehow superior and dominant in the line of crap you spout?
>
>> and liberal loons being what they are,
>
> Keep trying.... I'll say it to make you feel like you've accomplished
> something, "screw you again", but I really don't care how presumptive
> and voluntarily ignorant or accusatory and inflammatory you care to
> be.... my almost 60 years of existance tells me how to analyze what
> I see, and your bellowing about my ignorance will not change that
> one iota.
>
>> you're not about to let a little thing like not having any facts to
>> back you up on your charge of government censor****p keep
>> you from shouting it from the rooftops.
>
> You must be a raving lunatic. 90% of ALL foreign news from the
> Middle East MUST be cleared by the Pentagon. This is a run
> of the mill standard course of action, and it's only one tiny example.
> To deny it makes you look like... well.... a facist, propaganda pig.
>
>
>> It's not what's true, right David; it's what you can sell.
>
> Nice try at turning the tables on your sales-con there, Chucky....
> but you didn't swing anyone with a brain.
>
> You *must* be an attorney.... you have a great gift for gab. ;-)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> PS: Take off the blinders some day. Leave the textbooks long enough
> to see a little reality.... your illustrious politicians are
ALL
> bought
> and paid for, and your SCOTUS is stacked like a Vegas Brothel.
>
> America is falling headlong into the ****er and it's because
of
> blind-as-a-bat nincompoops such as yourself, claiming to be
> patriotic while aiding in the downfall of the nation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "America is a quarter of a billion people totally misinformed and
> disinformed by their government. This is tragic but our media is -- I
> wouldn't even say corrupt -- it's just beyond telling us anything
that
> the government doesn't want us to know."
> -- Gore Vidal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
