"Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ksICj.6268$6J3.5503@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "David Morgan (MAMS)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:2NyCj.381$sw3.37@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote...
> >
> >> Tell you what. Let's do a little experiment here....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 5 companies (well, 6 really) control *ALL* of the media that you see
or
> > hear in the United States.
> So what?
You like the word "control" don't you? I can tell by your speaking
manner.
> You're making allegations about content and censor****p,
That's my point, yes. The lack thereof is also an implied definition
of 'liberal' re****ting.
> not distribution and share price.
Who the heck cares about share prices besides the money lenders and
gamblers who are the very one's vollying for your pocketbook by way
of the brainwa****ng.
> Let me ask you something, Daivd: are you a citizen of the US, and if so,
for
> how long?
That's quite irrelevant.... I have two eyes, a brain, and can see what's
happening to this nation, thanks to the cor****ate Coup D'Etat of 2000.
> The reason I ask is we have this thing called a Constitution,
As I said... completely irrelevant other than to make your long-winded
dissertation appear to be 'patriotic' rather than in sup****t of the
fascist
regime now controlling this nation.... Yiou can take my family's rather
lengthy presence in the USA (pre Boston Tea Party), and place it squarely
where the sun doesn't ****ne. Your implication here is beneath you....
at least it *should* be.
> and this group of men called the Supreme Court of the United States.
Yes.... the same 'stacked deck' (SCOTUS) that brought you George W.
Bush and the first unchallenged Coup D'Etat to occur in the USA.
> There's also fifty
> independent state governments, each with their own constitutions
> (guaranteeing freedom of speech!) and their State Supreme Courts.
Seen any big protests in state capitols lately?
> You're seriously suggesting that six large American companies are being
> censored by the Federal government,
That they are voluntarily complicit in the dictator****p, or censored...
yes.
ALL media is censored in a <cough-cough> time of "war."
> and these fifty state governments are
> just going along for the ride, their governors, entire legislatures, and
> courts keeping mum.
I'm suggesting that the mechanism which controls them is bigger than
their sum total of effectiveness to combat it's presence.
> The really sad part of this is I don't think you can
> see how crack-brained that really is.
Your argument is beginning to falter, Chuck. As a matter of fact, you're
just one step in front of beginning to call names and throw accusations
rather than to assert any valid points addressing the contrary.
> You've been percolating in the
> poisonous stew of liberal thinking for so long your brain has turned to
> complete mush,
Like I said..... pretty worthless debate. Your objective here isn't to do
anything at all but provoke me.... a pretty old line of braindead crap.
> so that now you'll believe anything...I mean anything,
I fail to see that you're presenting any evidence to the contrary.... this
is innuendo and unfounded. Sorry.... not admissable as argument.
> ...no matter how insane it is.
Ho-hum........ getting sleepy.... veeeery sleeepy......
> You're letting your hatreds and petty biases lead
> you around by the nose,
I'm letting my eyes see beyond my nose and my brain evaluate what I see.
> and I bet you can't even remember the last time you
> actually critically examined a political statement or policy.
What the devil does this have to do with our discussion?
> If you believe the media is being censored by the government, David, why
> don't you sue them in court? Charge them with violating the First
Amendment
> of the United States Constitution.
I am... thank you. In any way that I can, every time that I can.
I have already signed several petitions for suit aimed at both the
mainstream
media and the Federal Government. Please.... why don't you sign a few as
well? Here's a good place for you to start....
http://www.petitiononline.com/6725/petition.html
Several of them have worked quite well.... and if you care
to join in, here are some results of the settlements paid by
the media.
http://www.medialaw.org/Template.cfm?Section=News
This do NOT change the way they do business... it simply puts a scratch
on their quite solid and well sup****ted bank accounts.
Join a few suits though.... c'mon.... help us get our nation back....
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_media_san_jose.html
> I know you've probably never read it in your life,
You know something, Chuck.... you're just DYING to rial me up, so
why don't I go ahead and ask you now to kiss my ass... you hot air
filled, presumptive twit.
> But you won't do it.
Like I said.... I already am, and there are better places to waste my
energy
than scrapping with right-tard sup****ters of the US global hegemony.
Actually... the US government is having a hay-day suing Bloggers to
prevent real news from being available, and censoring foreign media
from cable television access in the USA.
And you think *I* should file suit against the media by myself.... what
a childish approach to self defense. Single voices don't work very
well in a dictator****p, Charles.
> And we both know why: because you can't find a single
> government employee, federal or state, who is "censoring" the news.
Given what you say next, I can only assume that you're a blithering idiot,
or a paid political pundit. One normally doesn't stoop so low so early in
conversation, so I must assume that I've struck a nerve with you and
your line of super-dooper sup****t for the takeover of the USA.
> Of course, being the liberal loon you are,
I know you want this badly... so here it is.... "Screw you."
There... feel better? Do you think you've 'stimulated' me and
created an adverse reaction, thus making you holier than thou
and somehow superior and dominant in the line of crap you spout?
> and liberal loons being what they are,
Keep trying.... I'll say it to make you feel like you've accomplished
something, "screw you again", but I really don't care how presumptive
and voluntarily ignorant or accusatory and inflammatory you care to
be.... my almost 60 years of existance tells me how to analyze what
I see, and your bellowing about my ignorance will not change that
one iota.
> you're not about to let a little thing like not having any facts to
> back you up on your charge of government censor****p keep
> you from shouting it from the rooftops.
You must be a raving lunatic. 90% of ALL foreign news from the
Middle East MUST be cleared by the Pentagon. This is a run
of the mill standard course of action, and it's only one tiny example.
To deny it makes you look like... well.... a facist, propaganda pig.
> It's not what's true, right David; it's what you can sell.
Nice try at turning the tables on your sales-con there, Chucky....
but you didn't swing anyone with a brain.
You *must* be an attorney.... you have a great gift for gab. ;-)
Cheers,
PS: Take off the blinders some day. Leave the textbooks long enough
to see a little reality.... your illustrious politicians are ALL
bought
and paid for, and your SCOTUS is stacked like a Vegas Brothel.
America is falling headlong into the ****er and it's because of
blind-as-a-bat nincompoops such as yourself, claiming to be
patriotic while aiding in the downfall of the nation.
"America is a quarter of a billion people totally misinformed and
disinformed by their government. This is tragic but our media is -- I
wouldn't even say corrupt -- it's just beyond telling us anything that
the government doesn't want us to know."
-- Gore Vidal
|
