"Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:byqCj.6228$6J3.5234@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "David Morgan (MAMS)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:LqnCj.8739$hr3.8575@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Chuck Stamford"
> >> all I really want is a level field.
> > Good lord... I believe you're serious about believing that there's
sufficient
> > "liberal" media within the USA to counter the mouthpieces for
government
> > propaganda and faaaar right-wing nut jobs that dominate.
> > Sorry... but the US media is either voluntarily complicit or has been
effectively
> > blackmailed into little or no freedom to re****t the unbiased truth, or
to liberally
> > cover 'liberalism' or even present a balance to the cor****ate politics
currently
> > running America.
> You are, of course, entitled to your opinions, fact free though their
> justifications may be.
Chuck... the US mainstream media is biased and packed with
DIS-information.
There's nothing liberal in that re****ting style.
> Tell you what. Let's do a little experiment here. You go marshall all
the
> facts you can to sup****t your notion that the media in America is
slanted
> right, and I'll do the same for my view that it's slanted left, and
we'll
> just see who has the most facts on their side.
I did indicate that media is slanted 'right'... because the US government
currently censors (as does ANY government in a so-called time of "war")
the media, and the current government is *very* FAR to the right Also,
the media is faaar too tightly controlled by a handfull of owner****p to be
capable of 'liberal' re****ting under those cir***stances.
However, the issue really isn't *supposed* to be a political one when
we speak about the 'liberal' quality of the news media... so "left" or
"right" are essentially irrelevant. We're not using the term "liberal"
in a political fa****on here.... we're using as a descriptive regarding
a specific style of re****ting the news.
It doesn't currently exist except in a few limited places, where
management
is actually a little more tolerance of the constitution and the bill of
rights of
the United States.
> You game? Or just a yard bird with an outsized beak?
The only 'yard bird' is the one who can't see beyond the grass he walks
on (his political affiliation) and into the realm of re****ting real news
and
not simply pabulum for the brain, and re****ting without censor****p.
DM
|
