On May 7, 9:36=A0am, 2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(=95R. L. Measures) wrote:
> In article <0o432417lqt1gjsp70dc3jos1o9su16...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, duke
>
>
>
>
>
> <duckgumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 May 2008 16:30:09 -0700, 2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(=95R. L. Measures)
wrot=
e:
>
> > >In article <qjk124tc6i6pts800aboc1hshprm13p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, duke
> > ><duckgumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> On Tue, 06 May 2008 11:45:11 -0700, 2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(=95R. L. Measures)
w=
rote:
>
> > >> >> Undoubtedly not. =A0You forget that priests were evaluated by
outs=
ide
> > >> >independent
> > >> >> evaluators. =A0
>
> > >> >=95 =A0The police could not possibly care less how evaluators rate
a=
man who
> > >> >has had complaints of pedophilia filed against him.
>
> > >> So much for coverups.
>
> > >=95 =A0You missed it Duke.
>
> > Where are the witnesses?
>
> =95 =A0It is a matter of record that Bernie moved priests around whom he
k=
new
> were playing hide the sausage with altar boys. =A0Bernie's error was in
> assuming that pedophilia is a curable disorder even though the two
> maxi-experts in the field assured him that the disorder was incurable.
>
> --
> R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734,www.somis.org- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Everyone must have blind faith like Duke for Duke to be secure in his
own beliefs. Sad but apparently true.
|
