"Zadok" <nobler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1LVTj.847$KB3.282@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Three Mary Magdalenes you say??
>
That's right! How many "Maria Garcias" do you think live in Mexico City?
> And you have some kind of evicence that the Illuminati exist??
>
Actually, I do. The "throne of Satan" is now in Arcadia, California and I
infiltrated one of their "spy services." Everybody knows the CFR,
Bilderbergers and Trilateral commission as well as Skull and Bones are
linked with the "Mysteries". BTG is supposed to climb onto the back of
the
scarlet-colored wild beast when it reappears, and those institutions are
part of the UN, so...
Plus, right now, if you go to YOU TUBE and search "Illuminati" they have
ex-Illuminati members talking about the Illuminati, so... One even says
the
Illuminati was behind 9/11. You have to admit it was quite clever to use
planes. One wonders if Ben Ladin was actually that in genius or could
pull
that off so well. In the meantime, anybody with enough money can
manipulate
anything they want, start wars or anything. The Illuminati context is
that they make money from war and after Russia petered out as a public
enemy
#1 there was a need for a new enemy to generate war funds. The US is
basically not concerned with civil wars anywhere else so it needed to be
attacked on its own soil to get the American attention and focus. So now
the US has a brand new #1 enemy, "terrorists". But who funds the
terrorism?
I bet the terrorists don't even know. Follow the money! Wars cost
TRILLIONS of dollars and the Illuminati needs to get enough money to stay
in
power since China now is a growing world economy and the Arabs are
charging
so much for gas. So yep, I believe in the Illuminati!
> Which Mary Magdalene did Jesus marry??
>
> Smile.
>
Smirk! Jesus' "companion" the one he loved, was John, if you get my
drift.
The Templars and others made a polite reference to this relation****p by
making John into Mary Magdalene. The templars are not looking for the
children of Mary Magdalene but John himself, who survived down to our day.
Jesus loved John in a very "special way" unlike his love for the other
disciples. The esoteric gnostic reference substituted Mary Magdalene as
the
one Jesus loved in place of John making her his wife? Can you read
between
the lines?
In other words, it was understood that John was "sort of" Jesus' wife, but
that's complicated so they substituted MM. But the occult socities know
Jesus was a bit too focussed on John to be that concerned with MM or any
other *woman*, if you get my drift. The MM story is just a polite way
of
addressing that relation****p.
The same was done with Esther. Nehemiah was a "eunuch" and had a crush on
the handsome Xerxes. Jewish popular folklore of Nehemiah depicted him as
in
love with the king and when he asked to help his people he was sitting on
the king's lap and "batting his eyes" at the king. They spared no effort
whatsoever to hide this infaturation between Nehemiah and Artaxerxes. But
later a "polite" adaptation split the character of Nehemiah between
Mordecai
and Esther. Mordecai became the reference to Nehemiah's high position in
the Pesian court of Artaxerxes as his cupbearer/prime minister, and the
infatuation with Xerxes was politely handled by a real woman, the
beautiful
Esther. But it's the same basic story. Both get bad news from home,
panic, want to get the king in a good mood and exploit that connection,
and
at some point the Jews are armed and defending themselves.
So when there is an "infatuation" between two men, which occurred quite
"properly" (i.e. no ***!) between two men attracted to one another, one
adaptation was to create a female. So MM referenced this "connection"
between Jesus and John that they understood, but there was never any
serious
notion that Jesus actually married MM. They understood Jesus'
"orientation"
when it came to that.
So which MM did Jesus marry? Dohhhhh. Nada. His companion of choice was
John. MM was just substituted historically.
Smile. (You didn't get it from me!!)
Lars
|
