"Zadok" <nobler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:d8PTj.826$KB3.702@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> But I guess in the news recap of the action, the Roman commentator,
threw
> in
> some
> deatails to Luke only.
>
I don't think you understand how detailed the gospels are or how they HIDE
things. Secrets. You have to harmonize them.
Case in point the three different times Mary Magdalene came to the tomb.
One at night alone, sees Jesus in the garden in a different body, goes and
tells disciples. Shortly after that, just as it was beginning to get
light another Mary Magdalene with her companion, Mary the Other, come to
view the tomb. Jesus has left already. But they run into him on the
road.
They both grab him. He tells them to tell the disciples he has risen.
Then AFTER SUNRISE, Jesus' family bring spices along with a third Mary
Magdalene. Jesus is long gone by now. It is day. The angels tell them
to
go tell the disciples but they are too afraid.
Now because of cultural bias, "Mary Magdalene" is thought to be one woman,
but there were actually three of them named Mary. Mary was a very, very,
very common name, like in Latin countries. Even in the small company of
the
women taking care of Jesus, when there was more than one coming to the
tomb,
there was at least two Marys!! So Mary Magdalane was a very, very common
name, and the gospels describe when at least three of the Mary Magdalenes
came to the tomb to clarify which was which. One MM was attached to the
household of John and Peter apparently, maybe their housekeeper. She was
the one out of which 7 demons were cast out. The other MM was the
companion to Mary, the Other, probably her housekeeper. And the third MM
was likely the housekeeper for Jesus' mother Mary and her sister, who was
a
wealthy woman.
Now it might have been nice if at least one of the gospels mentioned:
"Hey,
there were lots of Marys around as you can see, and in the company of
women
taking care of Jesus, coincidentally, three Mary Magdalenes!" But they
didn't. It is up to us to determine there were three of them. It clues
you
into how the gospels work.
So your focusing on little details of Luke is very good! Usually when
there
is a parallel there is some secret being hidden that you have to figure
out.
Once you understand how the Bible is sort of tongue in cheek, you test for
the specific reference rather than the implied context. Case in point,
the
year of the second coming is provided for in the chronology of the "7
times"
prophecy or the "1335 days prophecy." So when the Bible says "Nobody
knows
the DAY nor HOUR not even in the Christ" it is a decoy. It would seem to
suggest that the Bible doesn't provide the specific YEAR, but it doesn't.
It means specifically DAY and HOUR. But this means most will not pay
attention to chronology and will miss when the messiah is supposed to
arrive. They won't be looking, thinking nobody knows when the messiah was
supposed to arrive, generally, including the year. But that's not the
case.
Thus what you see as little contradictions are actually clues to details
for
the anointed. Thus you have many who have a loose interpretation of
scripture or presume there are contradictions, but in fact, there are none
though the Bible goes out of its way to confuscate its secrets. It's not
God's intent for the scorners to understand anything....
ACTS 13:41 'Behold it, YOU scorners, and wonder at it, and vanish away,
because I am working a work in YOUR days, a work that YOU will by no means
believe even if anyone relates it to YOU in detail.'"
So just as the Bible says, some with eyes cannot see, and some with ears
cannot hear unless God imparts understanding. So for some the Bible is
contradictory and confusing, but for the chosen, it is a book of revealed
secrets and details. And LUKE in particular deals with details of the
second coming.
Even so, some of it is Christian bias and stubborness. For instance, any
Jew knows that Passover is eaten on a sabbath day, the 1st day of
unfermented cakes which falls on the 15th but begins on the 14th in the
evening. Jews kill the lambs at 3 p.m. and then at sundown the sabbath
begins when they eat Passover. It is eaten right up to midnight then
ended.
That is the very night they leave Egypt, which is the 15th of Nisan. The
same night they eat passover, of course. So they would know Jesus was
arrested on a Sabbath day. They would not be confused about this. So
when the specific day of his death is on a preparation day, they know it's
a
different day, since it is clear he was arrested on Saturday, the 15th!
Christians, who have disdain for the Jews and their customs thing
everything
they do is in opposition to God's law, so they ignore the well established
orthodox custom of passover. As a result they imagine not only is there a
contradiction between John and the Synoptic gospels as to when Jesus ate
the
passover, but they think he died the same day he ate the passover. In
fact, that is impossible and he died on Thursday, Nisan 20th.
Still, the Bible really only "hints" that's the case. It mentions Jesus
being in the grave for "three nights" yet dying one day before and one day
after a sabbath. That means there must have been a double-sabbath
weekend.
That was not the case of the Nisan 14th weekend, but it was the case of
the
following weekend in 33 CE where there were two sabbaths, one on the 21st,
which was the 7th day of unfermented cakes, followed by the regular
Saturday
sabbath. So the Bible actually provides us the details of when Jesus must
have died, but it is not apparent just reading the gospels. It almost
seems
everything happens in one day, but it doesn't.
So many, many think there are contradictions in the gospels because of
their
own biases, when the gospels are quite harmonious. But there is such BIAS
that if I told someone there were actually THREE women named Mary
Magdalene
who came under three different situations to Jesus' tomb and three
different
times, they can't accept it. It's easier to believe the gospel writers
just
got confused. But at that point God is not concerned because he would
just
as soon they were blind for having thought that. God shows things to
those
who believe and accept the Bible as inspired. For those who hold back
expecting the Bible to prove itself, God just may throw stumbling stones
in
their path so they can never see it. Even if they are looking right at it
and it is explained in detail, they can't believe it.
As a result, the "insiders" like the "wise virgins" who bring the extra
oil
get the clear undestanding and they do NOT share it with the "foolish
virgins", so there is no real effort to enlighten anyone about the details
of Christ. They see the Christ and see him arrive and see the "sign of
the
son of man" in heaven, but don't announce it to the world. It's remains
their secret and thus they have secret access to the messiah when he comes
as a "thief".
When the messiah is revealed to the world in general it will be after the
temple has been built, the spiritual temple of 1,440,000 sealed anointed
ones, with 10% being Jews of 144,000. It will signal the end of the
world,
essentially, following which the millennium will begin. It has now been
16
years since the seocnd coming in 1992 and the Bible says Satan would be
loose for just a "short time", so one would think the millennium must be
very close. And it would seem so with the impending economic disaster
impending, which is linked with the destruction of Babylon the Great (i.e.
Illuminati whom the governments owe all these trillions of dollars in
debt).
Lars
|
