"Varekem" <hanaram857@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fvnqu0$aib$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If thats the case, would you mind
> 1)Identifying the 2 witnesses
Actually, yes I'd mind. God provides a place for this woman in the
"wilderness" which is a reference to underground, secret socities. She is
"away from the face of the dragon" meaning Satan's spy organizations and
agents can't see these secret group members. He tries to drown them with
convincing propaganda, like the fake NB timeline where Jerusalem falls in
587 BCE based upon a lot of fake Babylonian records, but they do not pay
attention to this, relying on the Bible's strict chronology, etc. Or all
the jive talk from evolutionists that seem to be scientifically credible
right now, but who knows what scientists are missing in their analyses?
So
they ignore that also. But obviously, God would not have gone to the
trouble of preparing a place for her in the wilderness if it wasn't
im****tant for them to remain undercover in this critical period when Satan
is angry and cast down to the earth...
REV 12:13 Now when the dragon saw that it was hurled down to the earth, it
persecuted the woman that gave birth to the male child. 14 But the two
wings
of the great eagle were given the woman, that she might fly into the
wilderness to her place; there is where she is fed for a time and times
and
half a time away from the face of the serpent.
Note the wings of the EAGLE. Thus the "two witnesses" are part of the
eagle-woman. Matthew 24 thus notes: "Where the carcass is, so the EAGLES
will be gathered together." So the eagles know about the Christ, the
"two
witnesses" are two specific secret units which must carry out specific
things needed for the Christ directly, etc. as they manipulate things
until
the actual second coming. But it is all done privately and symbolically.
So it wouldn't be appropriate for me to point out members of the "two
witnesses" now would it? So it is sufficient that they were prophesied
about and allegedly exist. But obviously they need to remain a private,
secretive sect. Would you have me identify members so Satan's spies and
thugs can harrass them? So no, I won't identify them for you
specifically.
But they do exist and were present when Jesus took up the body of the
human
in 1992.
> 2)Identifyin the "Queen of the South"-notice it says "with the men of
this
> generation"(unless the judgment is a separate event-others have claimed
> the judgement occurred then)
> Luke 11:31
> "The Queen of the South will rise up with the men of this generation at
> the judgment and condemn them, because she came from the ends of the
earth
> to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and behold, something greater than
Solomon
> is here.
The Queen of the South is the Queen of Sheba from Solomon's time. She
will
rise up on JUDGMENT DAY like all will rise who ever lived. Judgment Day
occurs after the millennium and after Satan has been killed in the lake of
fire. So that doesn't happen until much later, after the millennium. The
Queen of the South is the actual Queen of Sheba. So basically, when
everyone comes back, both the righteous and unrighteous on Judgment Day,
they will compare notes. They will see how someone who was not a Jew
appreciated Solomon's wisdom yet some Jews who were under the Law and had
more of an op****tunity than most, turned their backs. So in that way, she
condemns those who deliberately chose a wicked course.
It's sort of like you have say 10 people who are poor and raised in the
ghetto around drugs and gang bangers who on Judgment Day will want to
excuse
themselves from drive-by killings. Well others who grew up in that
environment who managed not to do those things will end up condemning them
because they chose a more noble course. Lots of mercy will be shown but
COMPARISONS will be made of similar people in similar situations who made
different choices. The judges will decide where to draw the line.
After the millennium where there is government by Christ and where
everybody
is taught right from wrong, we still see some rebelling when Satan is
released: Gog of Magog. So that will be compared to the life of
everybody
coming back. It will generally be clear who, if given every op****tunity
to
do good with no influence from Adamic sin or inadequate political
ruler****ps
whether they would choose to obey God or resist him. Just like one third
of
the angels in heaven decided they'd rather rebel and die, etc. So the
"Queen of the South" is the lister "Queen of Sheba" who will come back on
Judgment day after the millennium. She's still dead right now.
> 3)Explaining why that quote doesnt mean his appearance after his death
> (Mary Magdalene visits the tomb, sees an angel in the tomb and Jesus)
As I said, the CHRONOLOGY limits these potential explanations. The second
coming specifically must occur 2520 years ("7 times") after the fall of
Jerusalem. So the scenario must fit that reference. The cross-check
dating
is 45 years after the Jews return to Palestine, thus 45 years after 1947
and
thus 1992. The STRICT BIBLICAL CHRONOLOGY begins the "70 weeks" when the
"word goes forth to rebuild Jerusalem." The messiah appears after 69
weeks,
and thus after 483 years from the 1st of Cyrus. Jesus was baptized in 29
CE, in the 15th of Tiberius and thus the 1st of Cyrus per the Bible should
be 455 BCE. That is not what the current chronology claims, it is 82
years
too early dating that event to 537 BCE. But if we presume that the
Persians revised their timeline and expanded the Persian Period by 82
years
and thus date the 1st of Cyrus to 455 BCE, when we can determine year 23
of
Nebuchadnezzar because the last de****tation is exactly 70 years earlier
than
the return from Babylon. Thus 70 plus 455 BCE is 525 BCE. If that's the
case, then Jerusalem falls in year 19 would be dated to 529 BCE.
Now, we know why the distortion happened. The Persian kings used two
names,
one personal and then a throne name and Xerxes adopted "Artaxerxes" when
he
became king. That's why the Bible calls Xerxes, "Artaxerxes" at Ezra
6:14,15. But he was the successor to Darius I. After Xerxes invaded
Greece
though and became a laughingstock, Themistocles who fled to Persia
convinced
him he could get away with claiming that "Artaxerxes" was his son, thus
fooling the Greeks. It worked!! There was a bit of confusion resulting
from just precisely who was ruling when Themistocles fled there, but we
can
see though that. The Greeks never did figure out "Artaxerxes" was just
the
secondary name for Xerxes.
The Bible at Ezra 6:14,15 clearly notes the accession year of Artaxerxes
in
year 6 of Darius, and thus Darius I really only ruled for 6 years. Likely
the Persians added another 30 fake years to the rule of Darius I so he
could
reasonably be old enough for Xerxes now to be his grandson as
"Artaxerxes."
The Persians paid off Xenophon to made another addition to the Persian
timeline and also altar Greek history, namely, Thucydides' history of the
Peloponnesian War. Xenophon clearly is the mastermind behind this because
he edits Thucyides (said to be its publisher) as well as provides a
comprehensive Persian history in the life of Cyrus in his "Cyropaedia."
So
he definitely was into Persian history. But the result is the 82-year
distortion that we now can correct. The true original date is 529 BCE.
I
only mention this because 2520 years from 529 BCE is 1992. The same date
you get when you add 45 years to 1947.
Sound incredible. Check it out! Come up with the history and archaeology
that can prove Xerxes was not the same king as Artaxerxes. You can't do
it.
For instance, "Artaxerxes" is buried between Darius I and Darius II at
Naq****-Rustam!!! That's where Xerxes should have been buried. And it IS!
Because Xerxes IS Artaxerxes. A fake tomb for "Xerxes" was an afterhought
and is on the side of those three original tombs. So that right there
tells
you something is wrong here. If you actually look into it, the more you
know the more you'll realize they were the same king. Even so, the
VAT4956
contains references to the original chronology so we are forced to date
the
37th of Nebuchadnezzar to 511 BCE anyway. So happens that aligns with
year
19 in 529 BCE -- big surprise! Here's the study outline if you need
further convincing:
http://www.geocities.com/siaxares/709guide.html
> 4)Identifying Babylon the Great
>
Babylon the Great is a vision seen in the "wilderness" as well. So BTG is
the secret society influence over the UN that influences the world through
manipulation of world finace. BTG would thus be what the "conspiracy
theories" call the "Illuminati" and Freemasons, and link to key UN
influence
groups such as the Trilateral Commissing, the Bilderbergers, the CFR, etc.
Per the Bible these secret societies linked with ancient pagan Babylonian
and Egyptian religion (i.e. the seeing eye pyramid, etc.), and thus "the
Mysteries" are called "Babylon the Great." Soon the UN will tire of
their
influence, probably when the impending world economy crashes, and it will
confiscate all the trillions of dollars the Illuminati has amassed, along
with all the money in all the religions serving as fronts, like the
Catholic
Church and every other religion also part of Babylon the Great. That is
yet to happen. But obviously we are facing severe economic concerns and
the
UN is already functioning as an "eighth king" in the world.
When the Illuminati is eliminated, world powers including the US will give
authority to the UN as the ultimate world government. Globalization is
already a reality. Individual sovereign states are no longer practical.
Think of the US economy right NOW. They think that the Arab nations who
control Oil and China will "own" the US in the next generation. Their
economies are bigger and the US dollar is dropping. Obviously, it would
seem in the US best interest to remain part of the global economy, thus
incentive to cooperate with a world economy directed by the UN. It might
be
the only way to save the world economy if everybody cooperates.
In the meantime, the banks controlled by the Illuminati are holding the
debts against the US. Our "deficit" is only what is owed to these
international banks. If these banks are seen to be illegally manipulating
the economy to gain power through world finance, but also encourage the
"war
industrial complex" by creating wars which generates TRILLIONS of dollars
along with drug trafficking, then all those funds could be considered
"illegal" and thus legitimately siezed by the UN, wiping out their
national
debt instantly, etc. Why not? So we don't know perhaps exactly what will
happen, but per the Bible BTG who now rides the beast and influences it
will
become hated by the beast and it will destroy it. Destroying public
expression of religion is reasonable in our times. Think about it.
People
get upset if chidlren pray in schools! They want complete separation of
Chruch and state. Some get upset when Christmas is celebrated. So
banning
public expression of individual religion is already going on. Churches
get
tax credits and can be legally recognized, but they are also a front to
various businesses and terrorism as well. So if you outlaw cor****ate
favors
to religion, forbid them to own property or incor****ate, then you will
kill
off some of the international sects, like Catholics, Jehovah's witnesses,
Mormons. Local small religious groups who meet privately may be the
compromise. Look at Al Quida and the muslim extremists. Right now WAR is
the result of religious intolerance. Look at the Crusades! So
intellectually, banning religion is a step toward world peace. Plus all
of
BTG's dirty linen will be exposed. Meaning all the secret things it is
doing under the cover of religion will likely be a major part of the
reason
why religions cannot be trusted and why they will be shut down, especially
those more directly connected with the "Illuminati" like the Catholic
Church, Jehovah's witnesses, the Mormons, etc.
Lars
|
