I have download this set of files and it is very useful and well executed.
All of you Goy who
are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no
further. This material is
free of charge and it has no pop-ups or advertising. It does not add files
to your windows
directory etc. You can even install it on a USB thumb drive and carry nit
with you so you can
show unbelievers what Jews teach about non-Jews and some of their
medicinal remedies which are
a real hoot. Remember the Talmud is supposedly a book of great wisdom and
is the centerpiece of
modern Judaism. http://www.come-and-hear.com/download.html
Here are some entries you can find and verify for yourselves;
http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_69.html
Gittin 69a
For swollen glands,8 R. Johanan said that pellitory leaves are as good as
mamru9 and the root
of pellitory better than mamru, and he should put them in his mouth. This
is to prevent it from
spreading. To soften it he should take bran that came to the top of the
sieve and lentils with
the earth still on them and clover and hemlock flower and the bud of
cuscuta, and he should put
about the size of a nut in his mouth. To make it burst, someone should
blow into his throat
seeds of unripe dates, through a wheat straw. To make the flesh close he
should bring dust from
the shadow of a privy and knead it with honey and eat. This is effective.
For catarrh10 he
should take about the size of a pistachio of gum-ammoniac and about the
size of a nut of sweet
galbanum and a spoonful of white honey and a Mahuzan natla11 of clear12
wine and boil them up
together; when the gum-ammoniac boils, it is all boiled enough. If he
cannot manage this, let
him take a revi'ith of milk of a white goat
Gittin 69b
and let it drip on three stalks of carob and stir it with a piece of stem
of marjoram; when the
stem of marjoram is boiled it is all boiled enough. He can also take the
excrement of a white
dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should
not eat the dog's
excrement as it loosens the limbs.
<STOP>
Any Jew could use the excrement of a white dog as a medicinal cure.
Remember it has to be the
excrement of a white dog and not a black or brown dog. :-) And to think
the Talmud is
allegedly Jewish High Wisdom.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_57.html
Sanhedrin 57a "'With respect to robbery if one stole or robbed or
[seized] a beautiful woman,
or [committed] similar offences, if [these were perpetrated] by one
Cuthean against another,
[the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an
Israelite by a Cuthean, but
that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained'" ... 'For murder,
whether of a Cuthean by a
Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a
Cuthean by an
Israelite, there is no death penalty'" ... But how can you say that such
robbery by one Cuthean
from another is but a 'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since a
Cuthean does not
forgive, is it not actual theft? But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika answered;
It applies to the
withholding of a labourer's wage. One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean
from an Israelite is
forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted."
Footnotes:
'Cuthean' (Samaritan) was here substituted by the censor for the original
goy (heathen).
[I.e., though it is forbidden to rob the heathen (v. Yad, Genebah I, 2;
VI, 8), the offence was
non-actionable. For reason, v. B. K. (Sonc. ed.) note on Mishnah 37b.]
<STOP>
Nice people the Jews. It's okay to withhold wages from a goy, it's okay to
steal from a goy and
it is kosher to kill a goy but woe be to the goy who did likewise to a
Jew.
In the following entry apologia is made for Jewesses to have ***ual
relations with dogs and not
suffer the death penalty lest there wouldn't be any women left for the
priests to marry. Those
Talmudic Sages must have had a lot of bestiality in their community for
them to author the
following claptrap.
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Yebamoth
Folio 59a
Rab Judah stated in the name of Rab: A woman who was subjected to
unnatural intercourse is
disqualified from marrying a priest.36 Raba raised an objection: And she
shall be his wife,37
applies to a woman eligible to marry him. This excludes [the marriage of]
a widow38 to a High
Priest,39 of a divorced woman38 and a haluzah38 to a common priest.
Now, how is one to
understand [the outrage]?40 If it be suggested that it was one of natural
intercourse, what
[it may be asked] was the object of pointing to her widowhood41 when [her
prohibition] could
be inferred from the fact that she had carnal intercourse with a man?42
Must it not
consequently [be assumed to be] a case of unnatural intercourse; and the
only reason43 [why
the woman is forbidden44 is] because she is a widow, and not because she
had had carnal
intercourse!45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
[...] Go to web page or download the Talmud to see all of the footnotes
45 Which proves that unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be
forbidden to marry a
High Priest. How then could Rab state that a woman in such cir***stances
is forbidden?
Tractate List / Glossary / Search / Bible Reference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yebamoth 59b
This1 represents the view of2 R. Meir,3 while Rab holds the same view
as R. Eleazar.4 If
[Rab holds the same view] as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing
to her previous carnal
intercourse5 when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the
fact that she was a
harlot,6 R. Eleazar having stated that an unmarried man who cohabited
with an unmarried woman
with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby a harlot!7 R. Joseph
replied:8 When, for
instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast, where the
reason of 'previous
carnal intercourse' may be applied but not that of harlot.9 Said Abaye
to him: Whatever you
prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be'ulah10 she must also
be a harlot; and if
she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a be'ulah either! And were you to
reply: This case is
similar to that of a wounded woman,12 [it may be pointed out] that if
[the disqualification
should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also,13 you will find no
woman eligible to marry
a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in some way
wounded14 by a splinter!
No, said R. Zera,15 in respect of a minor who made a declaration of
refusal.16
R. ****mi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is
eligible to marry a
priest.17 Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that
which is no human
being,18 though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of
stoning,19 is nevertheless
permitted to marry a priest.20
When R. Dimi came21 he related: It once happened at Haitalu22 that while
a young woman was
sweeping the floor23 a village dog24 covered her from the rear,25 and
Rabbi permitted her to
marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest. But was there a High
Priest in the days of
Rabbi?26 Rather, [Samuel meant]: Fit for a High Priest.
Raba of Parzakaia27 said to R. A****: Whence is derived the following
statement which the
Rabbis made: Harlotry is not applicable to bestial intercourse? It is
written, Thou shalt not
bring the hire of a harlot, or the price of a dog,28 and yet we learned
that the hire of a
dog29 and the price of a harlot30 are permitted31 because it is said,
Even both these,28
two only but not four.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
[...] Go to web page or download the Talmud to see all of the footnotes
6 Who is forbidden not only to a High Priest but also to a common priest
(v. Lev. XXI, 7).
Why, then, did Rab refer to a High Priest only?
9 A term which is not applicable to bestial intercourse. V. infra.
10 [H] one who had experienced carnal intercourse.
11 Presumably because her act cannot be regarded as '***ual intercourse'.
12 V. supra p. 394, n. 8. As in her case marriage with a High Priest is
forbidden (v. our
Mishnah), though she is no harlot, so also in the case of bestial
intercourse.
13 I.e., if injury to the anus is to be subject to the same restrictions
as injury to the
hymen.
17 Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as a
mere wound, and the
opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a
disqualification does not so
regard such an intercourse either.
18 A beast.
19 If the offence was committed in the presence of witnesses after due
warning.
20 In the absence of witnesses and warning.
23 Lit., 'house'.
24 Or 'big hunting dog' (Ra****), 'ferocious dog' (Jast.), 'small wild
dog' (Aruk).
25 A case of unnatural intercourse.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<STOP>
That "When R. Dimi came21 he related: It once happened at Haitalu22 that
while a young woman
was sweeping the floor23 a village dog24 covered her from the rear" is
truly hilarious
especially when you see the footnote "24 Or 'big hunting dog' (Ra****),
'ferocious dog'
(Jast.), 'small wild dog' (Aruk)." The Jews even elaborate on the types of
dogs mounting their
Jewesses from the rear or as they said giving them the splinter.
Remember the splinter?
R. Joseph replied:8 When, for instance, the woman was subjected to
intercourse with a beast,
where the reason of 'previous carnal intercourse' may be applied but not
that of harlot.9
Said Abaye to him: Whatever you prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If
she is a be'ulah10
she must also be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a
be'ulah either! And
were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman,12 [it
may be pointed out]
that if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural intercourse
also,13 you will
find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest [since there is not one]
who has not been in
some way wounded14 by a splinter!
Splinter is the Jewish Sage's code word for a dog *****.
Once again that last line "if [the disqualification should be extended to]
unnatural
intercourse also, you will find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest
[since there is not
one] who has not been in some way wounded by a splinter!"
IOW there wasn't one Jewess who had not been wounded by a splinter or in
plain English
"unnatural intercourse" aka "intercourse with that which is no human
being"
More Talmudic claptrap from New York City's Chabad Lubavitch Jews (These
are the Jews who back
Hillary Clinton and they are the ones with the quaint hats and long side
burns and beards).
http://www.mnemotrix.com/chabad/
"CB"N - ViewPoint: February 1998 ...Although the Jews are prohibited from
speaking out against
idolatry in lands outside the land of Israel, we must keep in mind that
this is our land, that
these are our people. The Bible is full of stories about what happens to
Gentile lands that do
not enforce the prohibition of idolatry.
Why don't we direct our energies on doing something about the idolatry
within our own land?
Christianity clearly violates the two primary Laws of the Torah, that of
idolatry and
blasphemy.
We need to take action. We need to go on the offensive. We need to
strive to establish
courts that uphold all of the Laws of Noah, not just a few of them. And
maybe then, when the
Church is too busy trying to save its own idolatrous skin to worry about
converting the Jews,
will they have the time to do other things, such as teach us the Sheva
Mitzvot."
http://tinyurl.com/43nfx3
"CB"N - Mo****ach ..Even within ka'al B'nei Noach we find individuals who
still struggle to keep
their belief in Jesus intact. Instead of believing in the Gentiles' Jesus,
they now believe in
a Jewish Jesus - and they now call him Yeshua HaMo****ach (Yeshua the
Messiah). They strip away
the Christian's anglo-saxon garments of Jesus and redress him in a more
ethnic Jewish costume.
Now Yeshua is introduced as an Orthodox rabbi, complete with tzitzits,
tallit, and tefillin.
And by doing this to Jesus, they believe they have rectified the Church's
whitewa****ng of a
Jewish Yeshua into a figure called Jesus, and that they have restored the
truth to the
world..." http://tinyurl.com/5we3py
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+hwwBm3e7xrwwebxXDqFqGgrGo5BowDarnwBrnDtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html#hit1
"CB"N - The Covenant of Everlasting Life - The idea of everlasting life is
rather appealing to
most folks... And now a personal observation, if you please: If (indeed,
IF: hypothetical
speculation with such an example is, at best, an exercise of futility -
the socio-historical
situation speaks for itself in the archives of Jewish history) the
righteous Jews of the Second
Temple period had taught the Seven Laws of Noah to the non-Jews, there
would never have risen a
religion such as Christianity. With the knowledge that (through the
observance of the Sheva
Mitzvot B nei Noach) everlasting life could be attained as promised by
Hashem to Noach, the
resulting fabrication that everlasting life could come only through belief
and wor****p of a
human being would never have happened. Instead, as we have noted, the
teaching concerning the
Covenant of the Rainbow - The Covenant of Everlasting Life, had been
forced into hiding by the
vicious persecution of the Jews, and the new covenant of Christianity was
but a pagan attempt
to replace the eternal Covenant made by Hashem to Noach..."
http://tinyurl.com/67nlov
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+BwwBm3e3xt5ZyeODHwFqGgrGo5BowDarnwBrnDtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html#hit1
"Sincerity - I am Abraham s Servant - [A] Jew is a son of G-d whereas a
non-Jew is intended to
be a servant of G-d. Although a Jew in essence is always a son, when he
does not merit (to
manifest the essence of his Divine soul) he is also referred to as a...
(4K) Excerpt: " With
the advent of Ma****ach, all non-Jews will willfully serve (the Divine
purpose of) the Jewish
people. Here lies the essence of the clarification in the mind of the
non-Jew with regard to
the identity of the true Ma****ach. As mentioned above, at present a very
large percentage of
the non-Jewish world wor****ps an individual Jew as god. The non-Jewish
world must come to
recognize that all Jews are indeed sons of G-d. The non-Jew must strive to
serve and help
G-d s children fulfill their purpose to bring redemption to the world.
Then will
the true Ma****ach reveal himself." http://tinyurl.com/bzemy
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+YwwBmeoxN1elkmdqekzbtqg5d1camoVoDnaDdDe2DqxiaTw5rowqrtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html#hit1
Does everyone get the gist of the phrase "all non-Jews will willfully
serve (the Divine
purpose of) the Jewish people" which is what they tried with their
communism.
Perhaps this will make it clearer;
"...Communism, despite its flaws and corruptions, has had a profound
effect on our sense of
social justice. Christianity, despite the horrendous atrocities it
perpetrated and justified,
played a major role in introducing, to a largely pagan world, the concepts
(though much
adulterated) of a one, omnipotent and non- cor****eal G-d and of a
messianic end-goal to
existence."
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/63558/jewish/IV-Wheres-the-Truth.htm
All of the above quoted from what Jewish Rebbes teach their nest of
serpents.
More (downloadable) Talmudic hatred against non-Jews = gentiles = heathen
= Cutheans = minim =
goy = goyim
http://www.come-and-hear.com/zarah/zarah_26.html
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Abodah Zarah
Folio 26a
MISHNAH. AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT ACT AS MIDWIFE TO A HEATHEN WOMAN,
BECAUSE SHE WOULD BE
DELIVERING A CHILD FOR IDOLATRY. A HEATHEN WOMAN, HOWEVER, MAY ACT AS
MIDWIFE TO AN ISRAELITE
WOMAN. AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT SUCKLE THE CHILD OF A HEATHEN, BUT A
HEATHEN WOMAN MAY
SUCKLE THE CHILD OF AN ISRAELITE WOMAN IN HER PREMISES.
GEMARA. Our Rabbis taught: An Israelite woman should not act as midwife to
heathen, because she
delivers a child to idolatry; nor may a heathen woman [be allowed to] act
as midwife to an
Israelite woman because heathens are suspected of murder. This is the
opinion of R. Meir. The
Sages, however, say: A heathen may act as midwife to an Israelite woman so
long as there are
others standing by, but not if she is acting on her own.5 But R. Meir
holds: Not even if
others are standing by her, for she may find an op****tunity of pressing
her hand on the
[infant's] temples and kill it without being observed; witness the
incident of that woman who,
on being called by a neighbour 'Jewish midwife, the daughter of a Jewish
midwife!' retorted,
'May as many evils befall that woman, as I have dropped [Jewish children]
like lumps of wood
into the river.' Our Rabbis, however, say: No; she may have merely given
her some kind of
retort.
AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT SUCKLE etc. Our Rabbis taught: An Israelite
woman should not
suckle a child of a heathen, because she rears a child for idolatry; nor
should a heathen woman
[be allowed to] suckle a child of an Israelite woman, because she is
liable to murder it. This
is the opinion of R. Meir. But the Sages say: A heathen may suckle a child
of an Israelite
woman, so long as there are others standing by her, but not if she is on
her own. R. Meir,
however, says: Not even while others are standing by her, for she may take
the op****tunity of
rubbing in poison on her breast beforehand and so kill the child. And both
the above instances
are necessary; for if we were told about a midwife only [we might have
thought that] only in
that case do the Sages permit, since, being observed by others, she could
do no harm, but in
the case of suckling, where it is possible for her to apply poison to the
breast beforehand and
so kill the child, they might agree with R. Meir. If [on the other hand]
we were told only
about suckling, [we might have thought that] only in that case does R.
Meir forbid, because she
could kill the child by applying poison to her breast beforehand, but in
the case of a midwife,
where she could do no harm while others are standing by her, he might
agree with the Rabbis;
[hence both are] necessary.
The following was cited in contradiction: A Jewish woman may act as
midwife to a heathen woman
for payments but not gratuitously!...
<STOP>
http://www.come-and-hear.com/babakamma/babakamma_38.html
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Baba Kamma
The same has been taught as follows: If the ox of an Israelite gores an ox
of a Canaanite there
is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite
whether the ox [that
did the damage] was Tam or whether it had already been Mu 'ad, the payment
is to be in full
<STOP>
Gentiles never have equality in the Jewish system of things.
In closing here is what the Jewish Talmud teaches about Jesus and deceased
Christians.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_56.html
http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_57.html
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Gittin
Folio 56b
Onkelos son of Kolonikos20 was the son of Titus's sister. He had a mind
to convert himself to
Judaism. He went and raised Titus from the dead by magical arts, and asked
him; 'Who is most in
repute in the [other] world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about
joining them? He
said: Their observances are burdensome and you will not be able to carry
them out. Go and
attack them in that world and you will be at the top as it is written, Her
adversaries are
become the head21 etc.; whoever har***** Israel becomes head. He asked
him:
Folio 57a
What is your punishment [in the other world]? He replied: What I decreed
for myself. Every day
my ashes are collected and sentence is passed on me and I am burnt and my
ashes are scattered
over the seven seas. He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He
asked him: Who is in
repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about
joining them? He
replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days
for ever.1 He then
asked: What is your punishment? He replied: With boiling hot semen.2 He
then went and raised
by incantations the sinners of Israel.3 He asked them: Who is in repute
in the other world?
They replied: Israel. What about joining them? They replied: Seek their
welfare, seek not their
harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. He said: What is
your punishment? They
replied: With boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever
mocks at the words of the
Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement.
Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
1 Deut. XXIII, 7.
2 Because he enticed Israel to go astray after the daughters of Moab. V.
Sanh. 106a.
3 [MS.M. Jesus].
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_106.html
Sanh. 106a
A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! R. Johanan said: At first he was a
prophet, but
subsequently a soothsayer.41 R. Papa observed: This is what men say, 'She
who was the
descendant of princes and governors, played the harlot with carpenters.'42
Footnotes:
41 As a punishment for wi****ng to curse Israel he was degraded from a
prophet to a soothsayer.
42 '****pdraggers,' (v. Ra****). Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p. 48,
suggests that Balaam
is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus (v. also pp. 64-70).
Though no name is
mentioned to shew which woman is meant, the mother of Jesus may be alluded
to, which theory is
strengthened by the statement that she mated with a carpenter.
Sanhedrin 106b
Did the children of Israel slay with the sword among them that were
slain by them.1 Rab
said: They subjected him to four deaths, stoning, burning, decapitation
and strangulation.2
A certain min3 said to R. Hanina: Hast thou heard how old Balaam was?
He replied: It is not
actually stated, but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall
not live out half
their days,4 [it follows that] he was thirty-three or thirty-four years
old.5 He rejoined:
Thou hast said correctly; I personally have seen Balaam's Chronicle, in
which it is stated,
'Balaam the lame was thirty years old when Phinehas the Robber killed
him.'6
Footnotes:
6 [According to the view that all the Balaam passages are anti-Christian
in tendency, Balaam
being used as an alias for Jesus, Phinehas the Robber is thus taken to
represent Pontius
Pilatus, and the Chronicle of Balaam probably to denote a Gospel (v.
Herford op. cit. 72ff.).
This view is however disputed by Bacher and others: cf. Ginzberg, Journal
of Biblical
Literature, XLI, 121.]
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_107.html
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin
Folio 107a
Footnotes:
II Kings V, 27. The uncensored edition continues: What of R. Joshua b.
Perahjah? When King
Jannai slew our Rabbis, R. Joshua b. Perahjah (and Jesus) fled to
Alexandria of Egypt. On the
resumption of peace, Simeon b. Shetach sent to him: 'From me, (Jerusalem)
the holy city, to
thee, Alexandria of Egypt (my sister). My husband dwelleth within thee and
I am desolate.' He
arose, went, and found himself in a certain inn, where great honour was
shewn him. 'How
beautiful is this Acsania!' (The word denotes both inn and innkeeper. R.
Joshua used it in the
first sense; the answer assumes the second to be meant.) Thereupon (Jesus)
observed, 'Rabbi,
her eyes are narrow.' 'Wretch,' he rebuked him, 'dost thou thus engage
thyself.' He sounded
four hundred trumpets and excommunicated him. He (Jesus) came before him
many times pleading,
'Receive me!' But he would pay no heed to him. One day he (R. Joshua) was
reciting the Shema',
when Jesus came before him. He intended to receive him and made a sign to
him. He (Jesus)
thinking that it was to repel him, went, put up a brick, and wor****pped
it. 'Repent,' said he
(R. Joshua) to him. He replied, 'I have thus learned from thee: He who
sins and causes others
to sin is not afforded the means of repentance.' And a Master has said,
'Jesus the Nazarene
practised magic and led Israel astray.' For a full discussion of this
passage and attempted
explanation of this anachronism making Jesus a contem****ary of King Jannai
(104-78 B.C.E.). v.
Herford, op. cit. 51ff. [The tradition of an early Jesus was also known to
Epiphanius. Whether
he derived this tradition from the Talmud or from an independent source is
a moot point hotly
contested by Klausner and Guttmann; v. MGWJ. 1931, 250ff. and 1933, 38. In
any case there does
not appear to be sufficient data available to account for this tradition.]
==============================================================================================
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt01.html
from The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling
I.
THE PHARISEES, THE TALMUD,
AND MODERN JUDAISM
Bible scholars are aware that Jesus Christ denounced the Pharisees. He
said they nullified all
the Commandments of God by their Tradition, "teaching for doctrines the
commandments of men"
(Mark 7:13; Matt. 15:6-9, etc.). His invective, in truth, cannot be
equalled. All of Matthew 23
is like a whiplash. He likened Pharisaism to a whited sepulchre, indeed
beautiful outwardly,
but "inside full of dead men's bones and of all uncleanness." Christ
climaxed one condemnation
after another with the expletive, "Hypocrites!" He called the Pharisees
children of them that
killed the Prophets. He foretold they would go on killing, crucifying and
persecuting until the
guilt for all the righteous blood shed from Abel on down would be upon
them. "Ye serpents, ye
generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" Christ
asked.
Christ is as utterly devastating of Pharisaism in the record of John 8.
Although He admitted
that His hearers were descendants of Abraham, He said they were,
spiritually, of the devil.
Christ told them:
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.
He was a murderer
from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because the truth is not
in him. When he
speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of
it (John 8:44).
The Missing Link
"But," says the disinterested Christian, "what has that to do with us
today? What a group of
Pharisees did two thousand years ago is over and done with!"
However, the missing link in Christian understanding on the subject of
"Pharisees" is best
supplied by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943):
The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break,
through all the
centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found
expression in a literature
of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The
Talmud is the largest
and most im****tant single piece of that literature
and the study of it
is essential for any
real understanding of Pharisaism.
Concerning the Pharisees, the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia says:
With the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.) the Sadducees disappeared
altogether, leaving the
regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees.
Henceforth, Jewish life was
regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed
from the Pharisaic
point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A
new chain of
tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition (Abot 1:1). Pharisaism
shaped the character
of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future. (See
Exhibit 264 herein.)
Historically speaking, scripture believers had accepted Christ as the
Messiah foretold. They
were no longer "Jews," but called themselves "Christians." They were
persecuted as such by the
Pharisees. The word "Pharisee" comes from the word "separated." (See
Exhibit 300.)
The Babylonian Talmud, Sole Authority
You may ascertain by turning to top Jewish authorities today that the
Babylonian Talmud, the
written form of the Tradition of the Pharisees, is the sole authority of
the so-called "Jewish"
religion, or Judaism.
Rabbi Louis Finklestein was chosen in 1937 by the Kehillas (Jewish
communities) of the World as
one of the top 120 Jews best representing "a lamp of Judaism" to the
World, together with Maxim
Litvinov (Finklestein), the Communist Commissar and bank robber terrorist;
atheist communist
Albert Einstein; those indefatigable Marxist reds, Harold Laski and his
friend Felix
Frankfurter (U.S. Supreme Court Justice) who shared honors with Rabbi
Finklestein and others.
Finklestein has long headed the Jewish Theological Seminary of America,
with branches in New
York and Los Angeles. In his two-volume work "The Pharisees." Rabbi
Finklestein writes:
Pharasaism became Talmudism
But the spirit of the ancient Pharisee
survives unaltered. When
the Jew
studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used
in the Palestinian
academies. From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa,
Italy. Spain, France
and Germany; from these to Poland. Russia and Eastern Europe generally,
ancient Pharasaism has
wandered. (See Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, and Exhibit 3 herein.)
In Rabbi Finklestein's history of the Jews, he states:
The Talmud derives its authority from the position held by the ancient
academies. (i.e.
Pharisee) The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of
Palestine. were considered
the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin . . . At the present time,
the Jewish people
have no living central authority comparable in status to the ancient
Sanhedrins or the later
academies. Therefore, any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be
based on the Talmud as
the final resumι of the teaching of those authorities when they existed.
[page 2] (The Jews Their History, Culture, and Religion , Vol. 4, p.
1332, Jewish Publication
Society of America, 1949).
"The Talmud: Heart's Blood of the Jewish Faith," was the heading of a
November, 1959,
installment of a bestselling book by the Jewish author, Herman Wouk, which
ran serially in the
New York Herald-Tribune.
To quote:
The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jewish
religion. Whatever laws,
customs or ceremonies we observe whether we are Orthodox, Conservative,
Reform or merely
spasmodic sentimentalists we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.
Why Was It So Often Burned?
Why is the Talmud kept so unknown to non-Jews? Why was there no usable
English translation of
the Talmud until the Soncino Edition, 1934-48? Why, in European history,
when the laws of the
Talmud became commonly known, was it burned over and over by order of the
Popes, excoriated by
Martin Luther, denounced everywhere, and its followers exiled from one
country after another
down through the centuries?
The Talmud's basic law is that only the Pharisee Jew ranks as a man, or
human being. All others
rank as animals, "the people who are like an ass slaves who are
considered the property of
the master." The attitude resulting from such teachings has been resented
by non-Jews in all
countries and centuries. Such resentment, however, is always ****trayed by
Jews as "persecution
of the Jews."
Moses, on the contrary, was most insistent upon having one law for the
stranger and for the
"home-born" and in teaching that the stranger must not be oppressed.
(Exodus 12:49; Lev. 24:22,
Num. 9:14; 15:15-16, 29, etc.) In fact, he ordered: "Love ye therefore the
stranger; for ye
were strangers in the land of Egypt." (Deu. 10:19) It was only the
abominators he warned
against.
Babylonian Talmud The Law
The Babylonian Talmud is the law for so-called Judaism. However, its
****ographic, anti-Gentile
and anti-Christian doctrines have often caused hostility against it. It
may then be argued by
some Jews that there is a Palestinian Talmud which is innocuous.
Nevertheless, you may look up
the fact that Jewish authorities state it was lost for a thousand years,
has missing parts and
lacks the "Gemara" and other essentials, and is only used as a scholar's
curiosity. Note the
statement of British Chief Rabbi Hertz in his foreword to the Soncino
edition of the Babylonian
Talmud (Exhibit 33):
The Palestinian Talmud
was for many centuries almost forgotten by Jewry.
Its legal decisions
were at no time deemed to possess validity, if opposed by the Babylonian
Talmud.
Was Christ Just to Pharisees?
Without some knowledge of the written form of the "Tradition of the
Pharisees," the Babylonian
Talmud, one is unable to intelligently judge whether Jesus Christ was fair
and just in His acid
denunciations of Pharisaism, or not. One needs proof, offered by the
irrefutable exhibits from
Jewish authorities (set forth elsewhere herein) that the Talmud reverses
every one of the Ten
Commandments, the teachings of Moses and the Prophets, and enshrines their
opposites under a
"whited sepulchre" which is a disguise for murder and "all uncleanness,"
as Christ charged.
Murder of non-Pharisees is always permitted; theft, sodomy, *****, rape
are all permitted. For
example, the righteousness of grown men violating baby girls under three
is a favorite topic
for discussion in book after book of the Talmud.
Talmudic literature is one long paean of praise for the very name Babylon,
and all that it
means to Babylonian Talmudism today, whereas it is a term of reproach in
Old and New
Testaments.
Note the Foreword to the first English translation of the Babylonian
Talmud by the late Chief
Rabbi of Great Britain, J.H. Hertz, who, like Rabbi Finklestein, was one
of the 120 Jews chosen
in 1937 by the Kehillas of the World as best holding up the "lamp of
Judaism:"
The beginnings of Talmudic literature date back to the time of the
Babylonian Exile in the
Sixth pre-Christian Century
When a thousand years later, the Babylonian
Talmud assumed final
codified form in the year 500 after the Christian era, the Roman Western
Empire had ceased to
be. (See Exhibit 30).
Rabbi Hertz extolls the Babylonian Exile, saying: "The Babylonian Exile is
a momentous period
During that Exile Israel found itself. It
rediscovered the Torah and
made it the rule of life
"
What he really means is that it was discovered how the Torah or Bible
could be used as a
"whited sepulchre" for Babylonian degeneracy, as even a cursory study will
reveal.
One Rabbi Akiba was a First Century Talmud "sage," of whom Moses was even
supposedly jealous!
(See Exhibit 32). Rabbi Hertz lauds Rabbi Akiba (Exhibit 32):
Akiba was the author of a collection of traditional laws out of which the
Mishna actually grew.
He was the greatest among the rabbis of his own and of succeeding times
His keen and
penetrating intellect enabled him to find a Biblical basis for every
provision of the Oral Law.
Still enthusing over the Babylonian derivation of Pharisaism, Rabbi Hertz
continues (See
Exhibit 34):
When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealing with what most
people understand when
they speak or write of the Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an
autonomous Jewish center
for a longer period than any other land; namely from soon after 586 before
the Christian era to
the year 1040 after the Christian Era 1626 years. (Exhibit 34)
[page 3] You will note in reproductions of Talmud pages that the word
"Gemara" designates the
argumentation of the rabbis, the ultimate decision being summarized as the
"Mishnah."
Bible Versus Oral Law (Talmud)
The Bible under Talmudic Judaism is considered to be a collection of
simple tales fit only for
fools, women and children. The Talmud "sages" thus must find new meanings
in it by letter and
number tricks which reverse the plain meaning and create out of it the
permission to do
otherwise forbidden crimes and misdeeds. The words of the Bible are
continually misused and
misquoted for purposes of blasphemy and reversal.
Stealing for themselves the title of "Israelites," the Talmud "sages"
teach that "God made a
covenant with Israel only for the sake of that which was transmitted
orally." (See Exhibit 60)
And the Biblical "basis" of this is given as Exodus 34:27. But that verse
states, instead: "And
the Lord said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of
these words I have
made a covenant with thee and with Israel" the opposite! (Talmud, Gittin
60b, See Exhibit
204) The Talmudic reversal of Moses' written words are said to have been
transmitted "orally,"
and through Moses himself believe it or not!
Bearing in mind that the Scribes were the Pharisee teachers of the Law of
Moses, carefully
distorted to comprise the Talmud, note: "There is greater stringency in
respect to the
teachings of the Scribes than in respect to the Torah
so that a Biblical
law may be
transgressed." (Talmud, Sanhedrin 88b, see Exhibit 95).
The Torah in its narrow sense is the Old Testament, and in a still
narrower meaning the first
five books (Pentateuch) of Moses. In its wider Judaistic use it means the
Old Testament as
misinterpreted by the Pharisaic Talmud. Always with Judaism the Talmud
ranks above the Bible in
every way.
Not reproduced here is a Talmud passage from the book of Nedarim (vows) of
which Exhibit 170 is
the title page. The Soncino edition of the Talmud states (page 107):
As will be seen on 37a, Scripture was generally regarded as the study of
children only, adults
usually investigating the deeper meaning
From this we see that it was
usual to teach the
Bible to girls in spite of the Talmudic deduction that daughters need not
be educated (Kid.
30a). The opposition of Rabbi Eliezer to teaching the Torah to one's
daughter (Sotah 20a "He
who teaches his daughter Torah is as though he taught her lewdness.") was
probably directed
against the teaching of the Oral Law, and the higher branches of study (V.
Maimonides Yad.
Talmud Torah)
The context shows that the reference is to the higher
knowledge of Biblical
law.
The Talmud (Sanhedrin 59a, See Exhibit 60), states:
A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death for it is written, Moses
commanded us a law for
an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs.
Reference is also made to the "Noachian laws" which the non-Jew may study
"but not laws which
do not pertain to them." Also: "
(the) objection was to the studying of
the Oral Law
Rabbi
Johanan feared the knowledge of Gentiles in matters of Jurisprudence, as
they would use it
against the Jews in their opponents' courts." Understandably, since all
Talmud laws
discriminate against the non-Jew and rank him a virtual animal, these were
apt observations.
The Jewish Encyclopedia is still more open about what is in Sanhedrin 59a
of the Talmud, above,
threatening death for revelation of "Torah" laws to Gentiles: "for such
knowledge might have
operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts." This observation
follows a dissertation
on the laws on cheating and getting the best of Gentiles in trade and in
court. (See Exhibit
271, left column)
|
