> Thanks for your thoughts but I fail to see where you answered my
> questions, which were in the context of Daniel 9:26 & 27. I also fail
> to see any references to scripture sup****ting your understanding so on
> what are you basing your beliefs? It is my belief that your
> understanding is in contradiction with the two verses discussed, but
> that is only my opinion.
>
> Born once, die twice, born twice, die once.
I rely on memory from 25 years back. There are no scriptures to to
sup****t Daniel unless it is Revelation although all the prophesies
have to fit together.
There are two primary understandings of Daniel 24 -27. One is
futurism and the other is historism. Futurism is the result of the
Roman Catholic's anti-reformation effort. Dispensationalism has
embraced futurism wherein the seventieth week is thrown down to the
time of the end, and fulfilled by Satan. Better men than me on each
side can't agree, so the matter must be disputable.
I don't recall what your question was but there are people who can
express my views better than I and you can fin an example of my views
on this web site:
http://biblelight.net/dan927.htm
