<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: is it wrong to be bi***ual?
Message-ID: <np5u30tiuti0t2qsehku6tem6kskp7tc5p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l57%b.764
$rI2.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <map%b.2861$6p1.24408301@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 179
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 10:34:24 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!chiapp19.algx.com!allegiance!
news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!
news.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:30:10 GMT, "Feenoney"
<crazy_beautiful_73@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"FBC" <fbcnoreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:l57%b.764$rI2.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Feenoney" <Fiona_Gray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > ...another one of my friends posed questions and I can never really
>answer
>> > them! I know it tells us in the Bible that it is wrong to be gay
(can
>> > someone please give me the bit where it says so, for future
reference)
>> >
>> > So is it wrong to be bi***ual?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Fiona
>> >
>> >
>>
>> What an interesting collection of friends you have!
>
>I think they just like to wind me up and ask me questions which I can't
>answer so they can then say oh well, Christianity must be wrong then!
But I
>just have to come and ask other people lol. I find the Bible hard to
study
>so it's good having you people here so I can ask questions :-) and thank
you
>very much for answering without being so darn sarcastic about things!
1st, to be sure you are getting the maximum help in your Bible study,
are you born again? If the Holy Spirit (the Teacher) does not indwell
you, time and people have proved that much/most of the Bible is a
closed book which you will not understand. (It wasn't written to 'the
world"; it was written to believers.)
2nd, let's assume you ARE a Christian, the "key" to scripture
understanding remains that you must be sure, each time you sit down to
read the Bible, that you ask the Holy Spirit to "open your
heart/mind/spirit to His teaching, and to give you that which He would
have you learn for that time).
3rd Be receptive, be OPEN-minded each time you read. Do not allow
beliefs to enter your head that are contra-scriptural. ("All will be
saved", etc). But DO be open to have your pre-misconceptions swept
away.
For instance, I recently re-discovered a passage forgotten for MANY
years, a passage in the epistles, that indicates that the 1st C AD
Christians were actually drinking wine (and likely beer) at church,
and getting sloppy drunk. Paul got word of this and was PISSED. IF I
had not been WIDE OPEN at that time to the Holy Spirit's teaching, I'd
have overlooked that, having been raised in a church (Southern
Baptist) in which they taught that we were to avoid alcohol. We were
even required for church member****p, to vow at each Sunday service, to
abstain from alcohol.
I was taught that NO one went to Heaven until AFTER Christ died.
Poppycock! That fails to explain SEVERAL Old Testament AND New
Testament passages, and I'd not have discovered the answer had I not
OPENED MY HEART, my MIND, and my spirit to the Holy Spirit's teaching.
Those who do NOT open themselves to the Spirit's teaching are those
whom I call "redneck Christians" such as in the deep South, where they
handle s****s, drink poison, and exclude n*s from their services.
The biggest group of "Christians" I ever encountered who used the n*
word were at my home church (some 5,000) in Wa****ngton, D.C.
People who have "decided" what the Bible says and then closed their
hearts and minds to any further teaching.
Also be sure you have a translation that is VERY easy to read (it
should be as easy to read/absorb as the daily newspaper). IF you are
ONLY reading the KJV, that may be a large part of the problem. If you
read the KJV, do yourself a favor and supplement that with other
versions. NIV, NASB, NEV, whatever.
>>
>> Anyway. Being tempted is not sin, suc***bing to temptation is sin.
>Whether
>> that sin is extramarital, homo***ual, premarital or whatever outside
>> marriage, it is the action that is sin, not the temptation.
>
>I'd have to agree with you here. My gay Christian friend
no such thing. Romans 1. At least, he cannot be ACTIVELY gay.
recently "came
>out", and when I questioned his ***uality, he said God will judge him.
God already has. The judgement has been pronounced on the "fatal
sins", that is, both those that will shorten your life (***
immorality, hurting one's temple--smoking), and those for which you
are banned from heaven (lying, a pattern of *** immorality, and
others) There is a reason those lists are in the Bible. "So we have
NO excuse for "not knowing."
I agree that we should not judge him, but I don't know if people
should make
>exceptions for themselves.
Correct. If one went to half the trouble correcting the problem that
they go to explaining it, they might overcome it, with God's help. I'm
not talking about pathology. Such as my mental illness, which I cannot
help, causes pathological thoughts and behavior. I'm talking about
WILLFUL sin.
Homo***uality is something we seem to be born with. However, acting on
it is a choice. And there is SOME evidence (the homo***ual doesn't
want to hear) that it is treatable as is any other pathology.
What if my friend never did anything about being
>gay?
The sin is in the activity, not the tendency.
An example. Ted Bundy, the 2nd most prolific mass murderer in American
history, came to Christ while in prison.
Talk about a conversion. He called Dr. Dobson into his cell and spent
several hours with him, confessing his newfound faith. To prove his
newfound faith, he asked that Jim arrange for him to be executed,
because he believed he needed to pay the ultimate price for his sins,
and he knew if he lived, his "demons" would drive him to find a way of
escape SO THAT HE COULD GO ON RAPING AND MURDERING WOMEN. He said he
knew the ONLY way to rid the earth of the threat he represented was to
execute him. He didn't want to kill anyone else, he knew he couldn't
help himself, so he asked to be stopped with the gas chamber.
The state of California obliged him, and it's re****ted that he went to
his death gladly, at peace, because he was secure in his salvation,
and he knew his voluntary death was the right thing to do.
THAT was a sincere conversion. He knew he had rape and murder in his
blood. He CHOSE to stop the only way he could. By volunteering for the
gas chamber.
No homo***ual has a more powerful urge, but they have no wish to
control it. They'd rather die than give up their abominable behavior,
and many curse God, including those in here. The cursing God, BTW, is
a tip-off that homo*** is demonic, not genetic.
And if you didn't know, evidence suggests that parents who dabble in
demon possession and witchcraft pass both on to their kids. So if a
child discovers that they're homo***ual when they're 5 years old, look
to the parents.
I know he fancies guys but no-one ever really likes him, sounds nasty
>but it's true, so if he never did anything about it, would that count as
a
>sin because he is still gay...it's a bit confusing!
AGAIN, the sin is in committing abomination (such as male-male anal).
Or in wi****ng and wanting and wi****ng and wanting and wi****ng and
wanting. (lust)
One cannot be held accountable for their God-given nature. Could be
God has "blessed" this person with homo*** urges as a "test."
As God gave me an anger issue as a test.
Would I hurt anyone? I have had multiple chances to hurt a cheating
wife and a conniving wife; I have hurt neither.
jw
>>
>> Regarding Scripture passages, I believe that John W is right to point
to
>> Romans 1, however the passage you are thinking of is probably
Leviticus
>> 18:22
>>
>> PC
>>
>>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!
border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-hub.cableinet.net!
blueyonder!news-fe1!news-text.cableinet.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Reply-To: "Feenoney" <crazy_beautiful_73@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
From: "Feenoney" <crazy_beautiful_73@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
References: <%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l57%b.764
$rI2.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: is it wrong to be bi***ual?
Lines: 48
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <%cp%b.2866$y31.24109097@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:32:59 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.40.104.248
X-Complaints-To: abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
news-text.cableinet.net 1077813179 82.40.104.248 (Thu, 26 Feb
2004 16:32:59 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:32:59 GMT
Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
"jw @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
news:l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> x-no-archive:yes
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:56:01 GMT, "FBC" <fbcnoreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Feenoney" <Fiona_Gray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> ...another one of my friends posed questions and I can never really
answer
> >> them! I know it tells us in the Bible that it is wrong to be gay
(can
> >> someone please give me the bit where it says so, for future
reference)
> >>
> >> So is it wrong to be bi***ual?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Fiona
> >>
> >>
> >
> >What an interesting collection of friends you have!
> >
> >Anyway. Being tempted is not sin, suc***bing to temptation is sin.
Whether
> >that sin is extramarital, homo***ual, premarital or whatever outside
> >marriage, it is the action that is sin, not the temptation.
>
> I must disagree/add to that. Being tempted is not a sin. "Oh, that
> girl looks sooooooooo good! I'd sure like to ..... oops! Forgive me,
> Lord!" is a temptation overcome.
>
> To see the same babe and think about what you'd do with her, and
> preoccupy yourself with what you'd like to do for a week, a month, 6
> months, is called "lust". Thinking, I'd _________ her, if only...." I
> wouldn't get caught, catch a disease..." is lust. Also a sin.
>
> THEN, to introduce yourself to her, find out she's VERY receptive, and
> spend the evening/afternoon/weekend/month/6 months
> fornicating-committing adultery, is sin.
>
> And I don't quote the OT because only those ****tions of the OT that
> are requoted in the NT or referred to in the NT affect Christians,
> IMO.
What is the OT? What does this stand for? (and NT while I'm at it...)
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!crtntx1-
snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: DoWhatThouWilt32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(DoWhatThouWilt32)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: is it wrong to be bi***ual?
Date: 26 Feb 2004 16:03:16 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <bf185273.0402261603.578408b1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l57%b.764
$rI2.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <%
cp%b.2866$y31.24109097@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.93.33.9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1077840196 11618 127.0.0.1 (27 Feb 2004
00:03:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:03:16 +0000 (UTC)
"Feenoney" <crazy_beautiful_73@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:<%
cp%b.2866$y31.24109097@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> "jw @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
> news:l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > x-no-archive:yes
> > On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:56:01 GMT, "FBC" <fbcnoreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >"Feenoney" <Fiona_Gray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >news:%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> ...another one of my friends posed questions and I can never
really
> answer
> > >> them! I know it tells us in the Bible that it is wrong to be gay
(can
> > >> someone please give me the bit where it says so, for future
reference)
> > >>
> > >> So is it wrong to be bi***ual?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Fiona
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >What an interesting collection of friends you have!
> > >
> > >Anyway. Being tempted is not sin, suc***bing to temptation is sin.
> Whether
> > >that sin is extramarital, homo***ual, premarital or whatever outside
> > >marriage, it is the action that is sin, not the temptation.
> >
> > I must disagree/add to that. Being tempted is not a sin. "Oh, that
> > girl looks sooooooooo good! I'd sure like to ..... oops! Forgive
me,
> > Lord!" is a temptation overcome.
> >
> > To see the same babe and think about what you'd do with her, and
> > preoccupy yourself with what you'd like to do for a week, a month, 6
> > months, is called "lust". Thinking, I'd _________ her, if only...."
I
> > wouldn't get caught, catch a disease..." is lust. Also a sin.
> >
> > THEN, to introduce yourself to her, find out she's VERY receptive,
and
> > spend the evening/afternoon/weekend/month/6 months
> > fornicating-committing adultery, is sin.
> >
> > And I don't quote the OT because only those ****tions of the OT that
> > are requoted in the NT or referred to in the NT affect Christians,
> > IMO.
>
> What is the OT? What does this stand for? (and NT while I'm at it...)
Old Twaddle and New Twaddle, same old nonsense, just a new sheen of
"paint" coated over it.
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: is it wrong to be bi***ual?
Message-ID: <fk5u30dqohjb03gn23ca37a85p1i198vsp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l57%b.764
$rI2.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <%
cp%b.2866$y31.24109097@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<bf185273.0402261603.578408b1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 64
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 10:04:07 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!feed.uncensored-
news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On 26 Feb 2004 16:03:16 -0800, DoWhatThouWilt32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(DoWhatThouWilt32) wrote:
>"Feenoney" <crazy_beautiful_73@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:<%
cp%b.2866$y31.24109097@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> "jw @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
>> news:l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > x-no-archive:yes
>> > On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:56:01 GMT, "FBC" <fbcnoreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >"Feenoney" <Fiona_Gray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > >news:%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> ...another one of my friends posed questions and I can never
really
>> answer
>> > >> them! I know it tells us in the Bible that it is wrong to be gay
(can
>> > >> someone please give me the bit where it says so, for future
reference)
>> > >>
>> > >> So is it wrong to be bi***ual?
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Fiona
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >What an interesting collection of friends you have!
>> > >
>> > >Anyway. Being tempted is not sin, suc***bing to temptation is sin.
>> Whether
>> > >that sin is extramarital, homo***ual, premarital or whatever
outside
>> > >marriage, it is the action that is sin, not the temptation.
>> >
>> > I must disagree/add to that. Being tempted is not a sin. "Oh, that
>> > girl looks sooooooooo good! I'd sure like to ..... oops! Forgive
me,
>> > Lord!" is a temptation overcome.
>> >
>> > To see the same babe and think about what you'd do with her, and
>> > preoccupy yourself with what you'd like to do for a week, a month, 6
>> > months, is called "lust". Thinking, I'd _________ her, if
only...." I
>> > wouldn't get caught, catch a disease..." is lust. Also a sin.
>> >
>> > THEN, to introduce yourself to her, find out she's VERY receptive,
and
>> > spend the evening/afternoon/weekend/month/6 months
>> > fornicating-committing adultery, is sin.
>> >
>> > And I don't quote the OT because only those ****tions of the OT that
>> > are requoted in the NT or referred to in the NT affect Christians,
>> > IMO.
>>
>> What is the OT? What does this stand for? (and NT while I'm at it...)
>
>Old Twaddle and New Twaddle, same old nonsense, just a new sheen of
>"paint" coated over it.
God bless you, too.
jw
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: is it wrong to be bi***ual?
Message-ID: <il5u30lcdqatkpn86mg572pm8h9cbtvdp5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l57%b.764
$rI2.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <%
cp%b.2866$y31.24109097@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<flbt30l8f7mbhe2df528ikbl1tqso1qsod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 28
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 10:05:22 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!feed.uncensored-
news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 05:24:21 GMT, The Last Church
<bleahcim49@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:32:59 GMT, "Feenoney"
><crazy_beautiful_73@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> OT? What does this stand for? (and NT
>
>Old testament and new testicular
You play with fire, eh, demon?
You can choose to not believe without being offensive. Being
DELIBERATELY offensive to Christians is one symptom of being
possessed, BTW.
But then, I'm betting you knew that.
jw
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: is it wrong to be bi***ual?
Message-ID: <sg5u301gvb0l314pmnftr75mu508q53r9l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l57%b.764
$rI2.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <%
cp%b.2866$y31.24109097@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 67
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 10:02:56 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!c03.atl99!news.usenetserver.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!
feed.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-
news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:32:59 GMT, "Feenoney"
<crazy_beautiful_73@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"jw @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
>news:l82q30t0bp3jt88n6v6104f6q4m0vk9tsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> x-no-archive:yes
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:56:01 GMT, "FBC" <fbcnoreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Feenoney" <Fiona_Gray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >news:%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> ...another one of my friends posed questions and I can never really
>answer
>> >> them! I know it tells us in the Bible that it is wrong to be gay
(can
>> >> someone please give me the bit where it says so, for future
reference)
>> >>
>> >> So is it wrong to be bi***ual?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Fiona
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >What an interesting collection of friends you have!
>> >
>> >Anyway. Being tempted is not sin, suc***bing to temptation is sin.
>Whether
>> >that sin is extramarital, homo***ual, premarital or whatever outside
>> >marriage, it is the action that is sin, not the temptation.
>>
>> I must disagree/add to that. Being tempted is not a sin. "Oh, that
>> girl looks sooooooooo good! I'd sure like to ..... oops! Forgive me,
>> Lord!" is a temptation overcome.
>>
>> To see the same babe and think about what you'd do with her, and
>> preoccupy yourself with what you'd like to do for a week, a month, 6
>> months, is called "lust". Thinking, I'd _________ her, if only...." I
>> wouldn't get caught, catch a disease..." is lust. Also a sin.
>>
>> THEN, to introduce yourself to her, find out she's VERY receptive, and
>> spend the evening/afternoon/weekend/month/6 months
>> fornicating-committing adultery, is sin.
>>
>> And I don't quote the OT because only those ****tions of the OT that
>> are requoted in the NT or referred to in the NT affect Christians,
>> IMO.
>
>What is the OT? What does this stand for? (and NT while I'm at it...)
In this context, OT stands for Old Testament, MOST of which is of only
historical value for Christians. NT stands for New Testament, which is
VITAL for every Christian.
Ask and you shall receive.
jw
>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-
service1.ext.raytheon.com!cyclone.swbell.net!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!
216.196.106.144!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!
border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!
newshosting.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!news-
feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!news02.roc.ny.POSTED!
not-for-mail
From: The Last Church <bleahcim49@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: is it wrong to be bi***ual?
Organization: limited
Reply-To: bleahcim49@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<gqat301n7f3mc97ii6ndbn06m7j1m1eifk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<992o30la3tkpd6sluprc14l9btur8enm9r@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<0jmo305nhhr0ssl1tjn4qmsf7nj0cibelr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<83kq30l3qmch38gaf2agtk6pmunlo51k5l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<r44r309umldjg18lgs1lo25i1lh974sdnt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 8
X-Complaints-To: abuse-news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
52616e646f6d49561656d1213f9041ef7e7ed8fef9b5c31329a63743e3218a35cc0056f79
8ad896cf0524e70d43119bcfbc76c44522d694bd2e2c69f8a0fc149fc16d15f398a480ca8
69c469f06b4dc133926d3faa9c0e9a04df4340b43ff491872edbd8e1ac7359d608cc74124
41801
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward ALL headers so that we may
process your complaint properly.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 05:24:18 GMT
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 05:24:18 GMT
On 26 Feb 2004 06:21:02 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>You need not speak, demon! We ALL know demons are liar.
>Say "Hi!" to your father, Prince of Liars, for me.
>jw
Be a good little boy and get your face out of my lap.
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: is it wrong to be bi***ual?
Message-ID: <ju4u30ltge8sjr26jlltuejcj2d2m022nt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <%XK_b.1121$xZ4.9956582@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<992o30la3tkpd6sluprc14l9btur8enm9r@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<0jmo305nhhr0ssl1tjn4qmsf7nj0cibelr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<83kq30l3qmch38gaf2agtk6pmunlo51k5l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<r44r309umldjg18lgs1lo25i1lh974sdnt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<gqat301n7f3mc97ii6ndbn06m7j1m1eifk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 25
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 09:52:50 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!
border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net!
feed.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-
news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 05:24:18 GMT, The Last Church
<bleahcim49@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 26 Feb 2004 06:21:02 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>>You need not speak, demon! We ALL know demons are liar.
>>Say "Hi!" to your father, Prince of Liars, for me.
>>jw
> Be a good little boy and get your face out of my lap.
Wake up, boy's boy, wake up! Your dreams are getting weirder and
weirder.
jw
>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!crtntx1-
snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: johnhennekes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(John Hennekes)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Chris, John H. Don. & others qualified to comment, Is this
an accurate rendition?
Date: 26 Feb 2004 08:38:39 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 125
Message-ID: <57266a6f.0402260838.6b3a7fb5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <403ac7e6.723440@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<2m9m30df2cu6snt65sblr0c8jq3v7a7r15@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403cd6b6.2662187
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.219.255.152
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1077813519 12455 127.0.0.1 (26 Feb 2004
16:38:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:38:39 +0000 (UTC)
spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone) wrote in message news:<403cd6b6.2662187
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:23:28 GMT, John Hennekes
> <johnhennekes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:45:46 GMT,
> >walksalone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
wrote:
>
> First of all, thjanks for the reply, this cn be a subject a matter
> that many *people of the book* find troublesome, & are leery of
> discussing.
>
> >>Need to verify this, seems it conflicts with historical data.
>
> >>Ezra 1
> >>1 Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of
> >>the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD
stirred
> >>up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation
> >>throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying,
> >>2 Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The LORD God of heaven hath
given
> >>me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him
> >>an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.
> >>3 Who is there among you of all his people? his God be with him,
and
> >>let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and build the house of
> >>the LORD God of Israel, (he is the God,) which is in Jerusalem.
> >>4 And whosoever remaineth in any place where he sojourneth, let the
> >>men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods,
> >>and with beasts, beside the freewill offering for the house of God
> >>that is in Jerusalem.
> >>5 Then rose up the chief of the fathers of Judah and Benjamin, and
> >>the priests, and the Levites, with all them whose spirit God had
> >>raised, to go up to build the house of the LORD which is in
Jerusalem.
> >>6 And all they that were about them strengthened their hands with
> >>vessels of silver, with gold, with goods, and with beasts, and with
> >>precious things, beside all that was willingly offered.
> >>7 Also Cyrus the king brought forth the vessels of the house of the
> >>LORD, which Nebuchadnezzar had brought forth out of Jerusalem, and
had
> >>put them in the house of his gods;
> >>8 Even those did Cyrus king of Persia bring forth by the hand of
> >>Mithredath the treasurer, and numbered them unto Sheshbazzar, the
> >>prince of Judah.
> >>
> >>KJV
> >>or
>
> SNIP
>
> >Bible inerrancies do exist. For example, compare the census figures
of the
> >Jewish people returning to Jerusalem from exhile in Babylon as written
in Ezra
> >and Nehemiah.
>
> SNIP
>
> >"The children of Pashur, a thousand two hundred forty and seven."
(Ezra 2:38)
> >"The children of Pashur, a thousand two hundred forty and seven."
(Nehemiah
> >7:41)
>
> >What can we say about this? The Bible is not a perfect historical
record but
> >only because people aren't perfect, like the men writing and
translating
> >Scripture weren't perfect, not working in the most ideal conditions.
>
> Not what I was looking for, I was concerned if the basic claim as made
> in Ezra is historically accurate. Even close to being correct.
> Not a an article of faith, but as fact that can actually be sup****ted.
> I have information that says it is an outright whitewa****ng &
> retelling of the tale.
> But I have yet to obtain a copy of the original material
> I'll share with you, rather than point you to a post I made to jw that
> he will not be able to intelligently respond to, unless he wants to
> break the mold he has cast himself in. T'would be refre****ng indeed.
>
> >I'm running late for work.
>
> Do me a favor, never hurry to respond to a post of mine. You might
> miss a thought that is germane to the conversation, & I don't hurry
> for anyone else. So it is but fair that you don't hurry on my behalf.
>
> Here is the basic information I have, & I have not found any reason to
> doubt its authenticity.
>
> Kurash (Cyrus) the Great
> The Decree of Return for the Jews
> 539 BCE
>
> From The Kurash Prism:
>
> I am Kurash [ "Cyrus" ], King of the World, Great King, Legitimate
> King, King of Babilani, King of Kiengir and Akkade, King of the four
> rims of the earth, Son of Kanbujiya, Great King, King of Hakhamanish,
> Grandson of Kurash, Great king, King of Hakhamanish, descendant of
> Chishpish, Great king, King of Hakhamanish, of a family which always
> exercised king****p; whose rule Bel and Nebo love, whom they want as
> king to please their hearts. When I entered Babilani as a friend and
> when I established the seat of the government in the palace of the
> ruler under jubilation and rejoicing, Marduk, the great lord, induced
> the magnanimous inhabitants of Babilani to love me, and I was daily
> endeavoring to wor****p him.... As to the region from as far as Assura
> and Susa, Akkade, Eshnunna, the towns Zamban, Me-turnu, Der as well as
> the region of the Gutians, I returned to these sacred cities on the
> other side of the Tigris the sanctuaries of which have been ruins for
> a long time, the images which used to live therein and established for
> them permanent sanctuaries. I also gathered all their former
> inhabitants and returned them to their habitations. Furthermore, I
> resettled upon the command of Marduk, the great lord, all the gods of
> Kiengir and Akkade whom Nabonidus had brought into Babilani to the
> anger of the lord of the gods, unharmed, in their former temples, the
> places which make them happy.
>
>
> As you can see, that do***ent gives the impression that the quote from
> Ezra is not historically accurate, nor even close.
> But what can be said for Ezra is, one can expect such a rendition if
> you have a priest class [in this case] trying to control a society &
> seeking a justification that people will accept.
There will always be those who believe in the entire Bible and there
will always be those who do not, and so I will depart the discussion
on this gentle breeze. If you should ever want to talk to me about
establi****ng a personal relation****p with Jesus Christ, then please
always feel free to contact me by personal email. I'm easily found,
and we're always looking for a "good & ready" man. Folks like you
almost always make the best witnesses.
>
> walksalone, who is no scholar, but a curious fellow he is.
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: OT: A differnt approach to advertising.
Message-ID: <n6ht30h425etmmmpj38j4h6gd2c2gd12ah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <4045143f.11313948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news3.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 30
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 04:16:28 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-
service1.ext.raytheon.com!cyclone.swbell.net!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!
216.196.106.144!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!
border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!sjc70.webusenet.com!
news.usenetserver.com!cyclone.bc.net!news.alt.net!feed.uncensored-
news.com!news3.uncensored-news.com!news3.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:44:02 GMT,
walksalone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
wrote:
>Definitely unique
>
>http://shoebucket.dhs.org/advertisement.html
>
>Not recommended for prudes or the weak minded that see evil everywhere
>by anymeans, though there is no evil there.
I'm not sure the baptist group is the very best place for this. Some
folk have no taste other than their tastebuds. As my sister used to
say, "some folks' sense of taste is all in their mouths."
Of course, good taste and good judgement never influenced crawls.
jw
>
>walksalone who has to admit, this advertisment is different, some
>might say subtle.
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!fe2.texas.rr.com.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: OT: A differnt approach to advertising.
Message-ID: <403fe71f.1217480@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <4045143f.11313948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<n6ht30h425etmmmpj38j4h6gd2c2gd12ah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 70
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:54:39 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.201.146.248
X-Complaints-To: abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fe2.texas.rr.com 1077864879 68.201.146.248 (Fri, 27 Feb 2004
00:54:39 CST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:54:39 CST
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com
On 27 Feb 2004 04:16:28 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in an
attempt to play nice while being offended scrawled the following with
his diaper paint. Poor baby.
>x-no-archive:yes
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:44:02 GMT,
>walksalone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
>wrote:
>>Definitely unique
>>http://shoebucket.dhs.org/advertisement.html
>>Not recommended for prudes or the weak minded that see evil everywhere
>>by anymeans, though there is no evil there.
>I'm not sure the baptist group is the very best place for this. Some
That's all right, most people aren't sure that you have the good sense
to not post where you lack knowledge or are going to lie, like here.
Or did you fail to read the warning.
I might note that you are the only one that took it on himself to
whine.
>folk have no taste other than their tastebuds. As my sister used to
Well, yes, yoiu hjave established that when it comes to taste, no
taste seems to be your brand of choice.
Or do you find women sitting on a pier where a stanchion has been
removed offensivre?? No doubt you do.
Not to mention, how do you know what it is about unless you went
there??
>say, "some folks' sense of taste is all in their mouths."
Well, in that case you are probably the proud owner of the bighgest
set of tastebuds in the world.
>Of course, good taste and good judgement never influenced crawls.
Can't speak for crawls, biut my name is in the headers so I can speak
for myself. & yes, I hacve good taste in mabny things. Now as to you,
poor baby that you are, I can say that when it comes to a chance at
selfaggrandisment or attempting to belittle others, your taste comes
right from the privy basement. Google doesn't mind verifying this.
Butr then, everyone knows that.
>jw
Heard about someone calling himself that, seems he was the champion
horse apple eater of the RCA.
walksalone who notes that jw can't stand to let a chance to play his
self-rightous biddy act get by, up to the point of stalking [or so it
appears] if he thinks he can get away with it.
>
>>
>>walksalone who has to admit, this advertisment is different, some
>>might say subtle.
>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
_______
>Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
> <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
>
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: OT: A differnt approach to advertising.
Message-ID: <3dut301teng9jl09mcp4eds0d4thmqkrtt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <4045143f.11313948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<n6ht30h425etmmmpj38j4h6gd2c2gd12ah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403fe71f.1217480@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news3.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 85
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 08:01:29 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!ngpeer.news.aol.com!
feed1.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!
news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed.uncensored-news.com!news3.uncensored-news.com!
news3.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:54:39 GMT, spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone) wrote:
>On 27 Feb 2004 04:16:28 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in an
>attempt to play nice while being offended scrawled the following with
>his diaper paint. Poor baby.
>
>>x-no-archive:yes
>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:44:02 GMT,
>>walksalone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
>>wrote:
>
>>>Definitely unique
>
>>>http://shoebucket.dhs.org/advertisement.html
>
>>>Not recommended for prudes or the weak minded that see evil everywhere
>>>by anymeans, though there is no evil there.
>
>>I'm not sure the baptist group is the very best place for this. Some
>
>
>That's all right, most people aren't sure that you have the good sense
>to not post where you lack knowledge or are going to lie, like here.
>Or did you fail to read the warning.
>I might note that you are the only one that took it on himself to
>whine.
So... let's clarify, ***** cat. Anyone who disagrees with your vomit
is a "whiner." ??? Then I relish the insult.
jw
>
>>folk have no taste other than their tastebuds. As my sister used to
>
>Well, yes, yoiu hjave established that when it comes to taste, no
>taste seems to be your brand of choice.
>Or do you find women sitting on a pier where a stanchion has been
>removed offensivre?? No doubt you do.
>Not to mention, how do you know what it is about unless you went
>there??
>
>>say, "some folks' sense of taste is all in their mouths."
>
>Well, in that case you are probably the proud owner of the bighgest
>set of tastebuds in the world.
>
>>Of course, good taste and good judgement never influenced crawls.
>
>Can't speak for crawls, biut my name is in the headers so I can speak
>for myself. & yes, I hacve good taste in mabny things. Now as to you,
>poor baby that you are, I can say that when it comes to a chance at
>selfaggrandisment or attempting to belittle others, your taste comes
>right from the privy basement. Google doesn't mind verifying this.
>
>Butr then, everyone knows that.
>
>>jw
>
>Heard about someone calling himself that, seems he was the champion
>horse apple eater of the RCA.
>
>walksalone who notes that jw can't stand to let a chance to play his
>self-rightous biddy act get by, up to the point of stalking [or so it
>appears] if he thinks he can get away with it.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>walksalone who has to admit, this advertisment is different, some
>>>might say subtle.
>>
>>
>>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
>>Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
>> <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <>
<><><><><><><>
>>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!fe1.texas.rr.com.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: OT: A differnt approach to advertising.
Message-ID: <403f44d8.417590@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <4045143f.11313948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<n6ht30h425etmmmpj38j4h6gd2c2gd12ah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403fe71f.1217480@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <3dut301teng9jl09mcp4eds0d4thmqkrtt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 57
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:34:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.201.146.248
X-Complaints-To: abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fe1.texas.rr.com 1077888847 68.201.146.248 (Fri, 27 Feb 2004
07:34:07 CST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 07:34:07 CST
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com
On 27 Feb 2004 08:01:29 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>x-no-archive:yes
>On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:54:39 GMT, spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone) wrote:
>
>>On 27 Feb 2004 04:16:28 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in an
>>attempt to play nice while being offended scrawled the following with
>>his diaper paint. Poor baby.
>>
>>>x-no-archive:yes
>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:44:02 GMT,
>>>walksalone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
>>>wrote:
>>
>>>>Definitely unique
>>
>>>>http://shoebucket.dhs.org/advertisement.html
snip
>>That's all right, most people aren't sure that you have the good sense
>>to not post where you lack knowledge or are going to lie, like here.
>>Or did you fail to read the warning.
>>I might note that you are the only one that took it on himself to
>>whine.
>So... let's clarify, ***** cat. Anyone who disagrees with your vomit
***** cat, still trying to impress yourself?? Apparently.
Now, trying for a strawman there jezze"? Won't work, everyone reading
this knows that is not what I said, nor can it be inferred from what
was written
with out some effort on the part of the reader. Course, a liar could
say that.
But then, you are a known liar & you are known to have problems
reading the written word.
Sorry for you but I am unaware of any requirement on my part to use
baby talky when attempting to communicate with you.
Granted, it appears your reading level is there when comprehension is
involved, but no thanks.
>is a "whiner." ??? Then I relish the insult.
Not everyone, in this case, just you. No one else was whining, you
were attempting to stir up mali ice where none was offered. Your
failed.
No one else broke a leg trying to climb on your honey wagon. A band
wagon it ain't.
BTW, for you, it was a compliment.
>jw
snip ****tion unresponded to.
walksalonewho notes the jw is incapable of comprehending the written
word, still. Or else is so dishonest that there is no hope for him.
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: OT: A differnt approach to advertising.
Message-ID: <jqgv30d3gih9it4eeami9i7um48s6hju24@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <4045143f.11313948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<n6ht30h425etmmmpj38j4h6gd2c2gd12ah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403fe71f.1217480@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <3dut301teng9jl09mcp4eds0d4thmqkrtt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<403f44d8.417590@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 77
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 22:21:50 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!feed.uncensored-
news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:34:07 GMT, spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone) wrote:
>On 27 Feb 2004 08:01:29 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>x-no-archive:yes
>>On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:54:39 GMT, spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone) wrote:
>>
>>>On 27 Feb 2004 04:16:28 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in an
>>>attempt to play nice while being offended scrawled the following with
>>>his diaper paint. Poor baby.
>>>
>>>>x-no-archive:yes
>>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:44:02 GMT,
>>>>walksalone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Definitely unique
>>>
>>>>>http://shoebucket.dhs.org/advertisement.html
>
>snip
>
>>>That's all right, most people aren't sure that you have the good sense
>>>to not post where you lack knowledge or are going to lie, like here.
>>>Or did you fail to read the warning.
>>>I might note that you are the only one that took it on himself to
>>>whine.
>
>>So... let's clarify, ***** cat. Anyone who disagrees with your vomit
>
>***** cat, still trying to impress yourself?? Apparently.
>
>Now, trying for a strawman there jezze"? Won't work, everyone reading
>this knows that is not what I said, nor can it be inferred from what
>was written
>with out some effort on the part of the reader. Course, a liar could
>say that.
>But then, you are a known liar & you are known to have problems
>reading the written word.
>Sorry for you but I am unaware of any requirement on my part to use
>baby talky when attempting to communicate with you.
>Granted, it appears your reading level is there when comprehension is
>involved, but no thanks.
>
>>is a "whiner." ??? Then I relish the insult.
>
>Not everyone, in this case, just you. No one else was whining,
no one else commented.
you
>were attempting to stir up mali ice where none was offered.
AGAIN, you read my mind. OUCH!
jw
Your
>failed.
>No one else broke a leg trying to climb on your honey wagon. A band
>wagon it ain't.
>BTW, for you, it was a compliment.
>
>>jw
>snip ****tion unresponded to.
>
>walksalonewho notes the jw is incapable of comprehending the written
>word, still. Or else is so dishonest that there is no hope for him.
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: OT: A differnt approach to advertising.
Message-ID: <00gv30hrh9ma1c0t9l9vjjki0172qr8d3e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <4045143f.11313948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<n6ht30h425etmmmpj38j4h6gd2c2gd12ah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403fe71f.1217480@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 160
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 22:20:32 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!crtntx1-
snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
zeus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!
news.glorb.com!news-spur1.glorb.com!news.alt.net!feed.uncensored-
news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
x-no-archive:yes
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:54:39 GMT, spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone) wrote:
>On 27 Feb 2004 04:16:28 GMT, jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in an
>attempt to play nice while being offended scrawled the following with
>his diaper paint. Poor baby.
>
>>x-no-archive:yes
>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:44:02 GMT,
>>walksalone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(walksalone)
>>wrote:
>
>>>Definitely unique
>
>>>http://shoebucket.dhs.org/advertisement.html
>
>>>Not recommended for prudes or the weak minded that see evil everywhere
>>>by anymeans, though there is no evil there.
>
>>I'm not sure the baptist group is the very best place for this. Some
>
>
>That's all right, most people aren't sure that you have the good sense
>to not post where you lack knowledge or are going to lie, like here.
>Or did you fail to read the warning.
>I might note that you are the only one that took it on himself to
>whine.
>That's all right, most people aren't sure that you have the good sense
>to not post where you lack knowledge or are going to lie, like here.
>Or did you fail to read the warning.
>I might note that you are the only one WHO took it on himself to
>whine.
>
I give you credit for ONE part of the above that you got correct! :-)
>That's all right, most people aren't sure that you have the good sense
>to not post where you lack knowledge or are going to lie, like here.
most would say, "That's all right, most people aren't sure that YOU'VE
GOT the good sense to not post where you lack knowledge or are going
to lie, like here.
Good for you. I now give you credit for an IQ of 51 as opposed to an
IQ of 50.
:-)
See how nice I can be when I'm in a good mood?
As for my being the only one to "whine", you might note I'm the only
one who commented AT ALL. The rest didn't BOTHER.
>
>>folk have no taste other than their tastebuds. As my sister used to
>
>Well, yes, yoiu hjave established that when it comes to taste, no
>taste seems to be your brand of choice.
We can't all be perfect. I'm mentally ill; what's YOUR excuse for
wasting air?
>Or do you find women sitting on a pier where a stanchion has been
>removed offensivre?? No doubt you do.
Please quote the part where I called it "offensive." I didn't say
that. You are a MASTER at misquoting and twisting things. Typical
behavior for demoniacs.
What I said was it wasn't appropriate for this group, IN MY OPINION.
Last I looked, I am still entitled to my opinion, or is your last real
name Hitler, Himmler, or Hess?
>Not to mention, how do you know what it is about unless you went
>there??
Well, besides my genius IQ and my award winning photography skills (BA
PHOTO-Journalism)...
I'm perceptive.
And, though this was not the place to put it, IMO, I DO wish to thank
you for the picture, which I DID download. Sincerely!
MY ONLY objection, then and now, was your putting it in a Christian
group. I've tried similar things, to open the group to adult
discussions; I've been shouted down and called every name there is.
Including by YOU! I suppose the point is, it's ok IF YOU do it, but
NOT if *I* do it. Forgive me: I'm still working on figuring out the
logic of that. Okay! I've figured it out. There' s no logic; you're
merely very egocentric.
(you don't need to look that up; it means I called you self-centered)
>
>>say, "some folks' sense of taste is all in their mouths."
>
>Well, in that case you are probably the proud owner of the bighgest
>set of tastebuds in the world.
>
>>Of course, good taste and good judgement never influenced crawls.
>
>Can't speak for crawls, biut my name is in the headers so I can speak
>for myself. & yes, I hacve good taste in mabny things.
I bet. How many great works of art have you seen and enjoyed? The
Mona Lisa? The David? The Last Supper?
I was blessed to see The David before the kook broke it.
Now as to you,
>poor baby that you are, I can say that when it comes to a chance at
>selfaggrandisment or attempting to belittle others, your taste comes
>right from the privy basement. Google doesn't mind verifying this.
You have yet to figure out that lots of things that are fine on the
internet, and in google, don't belong in here. Such as you.
I have no regrets for my real posts that are in google. I do object to
those posts that are being confused with mine. I also object to people
archiving my writing w/o my permission.
>
>Butr then, everyone knows that.
Once again, crawls decides to speak for the entire planet. That's
called "megalomania".
jw
>
>>jw
>
>Heard about someone calling himself that, seems he was the champion
>horse apple eater of the RCA.
>
>walksalone who notes that jw can't stand to let a chance to play his
>self-rightous biddy act get by, up to the point of stalking [or so it
>appears] if he thinks he can get away with it.
keep that up and you're gonna make me cry.
sniff.
I'm over it now.
"You have been warned..."
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>walksalone who has to admit, this advertisment is different, some
>>>might say subtle.
>>
>>
>>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
>>Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
>> <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <>
<><><><><><><>
>>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!
corp.supernews.com!NewsWatcher!user
From: +r@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(€ R.L. Measures)
Newsgroups:
alt.talk.creationism,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christia
n.roman-catholic,alt.religion.christian.biblestudy
Subject: Re: RCC Examined-1
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:45:36 -0800
Organization: srk
Message-ID: <+r-2602041345360001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <IKnowHim-1802041151380001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<ngk7309g4kglsre0rgl8t0n7d950vbgudn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<cssb30l0gvjghnu7i8m0ccnnkiengnp4k8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<bbdc30t45i16ojm5vjrb72joc0l517hi23@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<i7de305roqengsja659eak19s6sjfuk8a0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<co5f301g8cr8bovg5indv4t2uj7jd15giq@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<91bh30hm4oqqcj7vnodjsbndgfrpt4tqgp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<103irichkogij1f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <9lam30pv6jkqacphdbbjur2tsv5q8co9ji@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <103nu4jqu6joo9c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <+r-2502040127450001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <IKnowHim-2502040912030001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
User-Agent: NewsWatcher-X 2.2.3b2
X-Complaints-To: abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
69
alt.religion.christian.baptist:506762 alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic:832061 alt.religion.christian.biblestudy:281953
In article <IKnowHim-2502040912030001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
IKnowHim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(IKnowHimDoYou) wrote:
> In article <+r-2502040127450001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, +r@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(€ R.L.
> Measures) wrote:
>
> > In article <103nu4jqu6joo9c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "mich"
<mich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > "jw @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
> > > news:9lam30pv6jkqacphdbbjur2tsv5q8co9ji@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > x-no-archive:yes
> > > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:06:53 -0500, "mich" <mich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >From: "John W @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no>
> > > > >Subject: Re: RCC Examined-1
> > > > >Date: février 22, 2004 08:28
> > >
> > > > >Anything not pertaining to the true God is idolatry, but
anything
> > > pertaining
> > > > >to the true God is found to be Holy,and is treated as such. With
this
> > > > >definition,
> > > > >everything agrees.
> > > >
> > > > Tell me, please, where the above definition of "idol" came from?
Not
> > > > from the Bible!!! Here is a perfect example of where you allow
Rome
> > > > to supersede and contradict the Bible. The Bible defines "idols"
VERY
> > > > specifically, and that definition includes those "statues"
(idols) in
> > > > Catholic Churches. Rome may not supersede God.
> > >
> > > The bible reads:"You shall not have any other gods besides me".
> > > " You shall not make for yourself an idol
in the
> > > form of
> > > anything..." .
> > > "You shall not bow down to them in
wor****p".
> > > " Do not make any gods alongside of me; do
not make
> > > for yourselves gods of silver or gods of gold."
> > >
> > > The definition of idol which I have given you is "anything(images)
that do
> > > not pertain to the true God;simply put, " do not have any other
gods
besides
> > > me."If you cannot deduce this from the above, while respecting your
personal
> > > interpretation , but it's not how I see it....at all.
> > > ...
> > ** One can completely avoid the sin of wor****ping idols by simply
> > venerating, revering and adoring statues.
> >
> > --
> > € R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
> ______________________________________________
>
> HaHaHa! Very good!
** thanks, but that one could cost me an extra week in Purgatory. But
what the hell, I hate cold weather.
>
> BTW, mich misquoted the 1st commandment . It is"no other gods BEFORE
me"
> not BESIDE me.In the Jerusalem Bible(RCC) it is "no other gods EXCEPT
> me"...
>
> So he has not a carved statute to stand on.....
Chortle
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-
limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.democrat,alt.politics.libertarian
,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
Subject: Re: Bodies popping up out of the ground.
Message-ID: <19it301tmn07oa66em9o3ceofiqkc8k68r@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <c1l8ju$la2$0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <pir%b.21617$W74.6838
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news3.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 263
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 04:33:35 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!news3.optonline.net!newsfeed.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!
cyclone.bc.net!news.alt.net!feed.uncensored-news.com!news3.uncensored-
news.com!news3.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
alt.politics.bush:2102751 alt.politics.libertarian:728575
alt.religion.christian.baptist:506868 alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic:832212
From: "ConservativeAlerts.com" <alerts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Add to
Address Book
To: "John Sheets" <john_weatherly47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: [ALERT] MeetUp with Conservatives in YOUR City on Tuesday
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:06:15 -0800
This CONSERVATIVE ALERT prepared for John Sheets:
ISSUE: Next Tuesday night (March 2nd), in
hundreds of cities
across America, conservatives will be coming
together once
again for their local "Townhall MeetUp". YOU need
to come, too!
http://townhall.meetup.com/
<a href="http://townhall.meetup.com/">
AOL GO
HERE </a>
"MeetUp.com" is a for-profit, non-partisan,
independent
business that provides a platform where people
with similar
interests can meet each other offline for
whatever cause they
believe in. Several political campaigns, media
personalities,
and advocacy groups of the left AND the right,
including the
conservative ****tal site Townhall.com, have
partnered with
MeetUp to allow their individual groups to
organize.
Yes, as we've seen, the liberals have been a bit
quicker to
take advantage of this tool. A lot of the media
coverage lately
has been focused on what the Left is doing
online, but quietly
we've been building our own grassroots team. And
now WE are
zooming forward -- the Townhall MeetUp is now the
*fastest
growing* group meeting nationwide, with over
22,000
conservatives in over 612 cities already signed
up to meet
each month, and there's no limit to how far we
can take it!
If you've never been to one before, these MeetUps
are a GREAT
way for local conservatives to get together, have
a bite to
eat or a drink together, and strategize the best
way to
implement their local version of the "vast
right-wing
conspiracy." You can even upload digital pictures
of your
gathering to the website afterwards!
AND, once again, we've got a special job for you
to do at
YOUR local MeetUp!
ACTION ITEM: There's no substitute for activism
at the local
level in the fight for American values, and we
need you. The
Left is out screaming about "taking their country
back." What
they *really* mean is that they want to take this
country
back -- from YOU.
This is a great op****tunity to also organize a
local group
to head up to Wa****ngton, DC for our HUGE
counter-protest we
told you about that's coming up in April
(http://www.rightmarch.com/march/
), when we'll
be taking a
stand against the tens of thousands of radical
liberals that
will be marching in the streets of our nation's
capitol.
You can let everyone at your local MeetUp know
about this
great event by downloading our PDF flyer and
handing out
copies at your gathering:
http://www.conservativealerts.com/rightmarch/march.pdf
<a
href="http://www.conservativealerts.com/rightmarch/march.pdf">
AOL GO HERE </a>
Download the flyer, make copies, and hand them
out at your
local MeetUp -- maybe you can carpool, caravan,
or charter a
bus to head up to DC in April!
NOTE: There are other conservative MeetUps
coming up soon;
make sure you're signed up for our e-mail list
(http://www.conservativealerts.com/
) so we can
notify you of
when and where they are. And by the way, if you'd
like to sign
up for one or two LIBERAL MeetUps and "spy" for
us, to keep us
informed about what THEY'RE up to -- let us know!
(mailto:alerts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
Be sure to download the PDF flyer about the April
Counter-
Protest in Wa****ngton, DC, and make enough copies
to hand out
to the other MeetUp attendees. Don't forget to
take a digital
camera if you have one handy, so you can upload
photos to the
MeetUp website. And be sure to forward this
e-mail to everyone
you know who wants to get together with local
right-thinking
folks, ready to advance the conservative agenda
-- locally,
and nationwide. Thank you!
------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this communication because you
requested
to be e-mailed regarding issues and offers of
interest to
conservatives, either when you sent an e-mail to
Congress,
signed an online petition, sent a FedEx, blast
fax or
mailgram, or when you donated to a conservative
cause or
candidate on the Internet or through postal mail.
You are
currently subscribed as:
john_weatherly47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
removal of your subscription, send an email
to
leave-conservativealerts-45875L@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
't lose ConservativeAlerts e-mails to that
spam filter...
To ensure delivery of your action alerts, please
add
"alerts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" to your address
book, spam filter
"whitelist", or tell your company's IT group to
allow this
address to pass through any filtering software
they may have
set up.
Was this message forwarded to you by a friend?
You can sign
up for the ConservativeAlerts.com Action Alerts
for FREE!
Go here:
http://www.ConservativeAlerts.com/
4850 Golden Pkwy., Ste. B #325, Buford GA
30518-1712
------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:55:17 GMT, "King Pineapple"
<saddlepill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Drooling Leftist "z" <zee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:c1l8ju$la2$0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Bush Sr. , we learn now,
>
>How do we "learn" this now, kid?
>
>>was co-President to Reagan--it was dismissed as
>> "delegation", but it would appear that Bush was likely "co-president"
from
>> the start (Baker called secret meeting whether Reagan was even up to
the
>> job) ......perhaps he just could'nt track the complexities of
>international
>> realpolitik.
Nonsense. What you are describing IS known as "delegation." You are
merely spouting sour grapes because you don't care for how the named
Presidents chose to delegate.
There's an excellent story that demonstrates the above fact
graphically. I don't believe anyone in this group would object to
President Abraham Lincoln. The story goes that one day, he called in
the entire cabinet to discuss a particular problem. He had apparently
already made up his mind, but he wanted feedback from his most
trusted, most knowledgeable advisors. He patiently sat through HOURS
of discussion and debate, giving each cabinet member his/her due to
persuade the President of their POV. Finally, when ALL sides had
spoken, President Lincoln called for a vote on the matter. Every
single cabinet member voted "Nay!" At the end of the vote, he was
sitting there, looking at all those "Nay votes." He replied, "XX Nay"
votes; I vote "Aye!" The Ayes win."
As President Harry Truman said, "The Buck Stops Here!"
>
>So what? Hillary Clinton was Co-President, too. I guess this practice is
>acceptable as long as it's done by people in the "correct" political
>party...
Yes. And 8 years as President weren't enough for her. She wants
another 8.
>
> > Day after day, the train wreck continues. It's heart-breaking to
watch
>the
>> pileup grow..........
>
>Yeah, it's a "train wreck", all right. But it's YOUR wreckage that
litters
>the tracks:
>
>Today's democrat party is disconnected from leader****p power at every
level
>of government.
>
>1) The democrat party doesn't have the White House.(1R-0d)
>2) The democrat party lacks a majority in the Senate.(51R-48d-1)
>3) The democrat party lacks a majority in the House of
>Representatives.(226R-209d)
Thank God ! Let us not forget our last Democratic President and
Democrat-controlled congress SERIOUSLy eroded our constitutional
rights. First the newborn euthanasia bill (PBA), then the laws that
abridged our right to bear arms.
jw
>4) The democrat party lacks a majority of Governors seats across the 50
>states.(26R-24d)
>5) The democrat party lacks a majority of State Houses across all 50
states.
>(25R-22d)
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.biblestudy
Subject: Re: Gay-*** marriage Amend. needs Ban Divorce
Message-ID: <tght30572jct999igeor76t0f2uo83ogq7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <71bd538c.0402250603.5ade2f08@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<t4vq30ds6c6tdda7b20skk0uhem3j5vk2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402260928.4f77ef75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<hmes30tckbe2ck8hq8tn94280aufjakqev@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402261609.346a5dd0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news3.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 68
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 04:23:19 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!c03.atl99!news.usenetserver.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!
feed.uncensored-news.com!news3.uncensored-news.com!news3.uncensored-
news.com!not-for-mail
alt.religion.christian.baptist:506859
alt.religion.christian.biblestudy:282047
x-no-archive:yes
On 26 Feb 2004 16:09:06 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
>Rob <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<hmes30tckbe2ck8hq8tn94280aufjakqev@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> On 26 Feb 2004 09:28:47 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
>>
>> >Rob <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<t4vq30ds6c6tdda7b20skk0uhem3j5vk2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> >> On 25 Feb 2004 06:03:34 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Since President George W. Bush announced on Tuesday his sup****t
for a
>> >> >constitutional amendment banning same-*** marriage, my
recommendation
>> >> >is to expand his so-called protection of marriage to include in
the
>> >> >amendment a BAN ON DIVORCE, since we're at it.
>> >>
>> >> You obviously don't get it - what G.W. did was a stroke of genius.
By proposing
>> >> a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage he placated both
sides. Those
>> >> against gay marriage are placated because the most powerful man in
the world is
>> >> sup****ting their agenda. Conversely, those for gay marriage are
happy because
>> >> by the President proposing a constitutional amendment to ban gay
marriage he is
>> >> admitting that it is currently unconstitutional to ban gay
marriage, and gay
>> >> activists know that a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage
will never
>> >> happen. So what happens in the meantime - G.W. gets reelected.
>> >
>> >YOU are the one who does not get it.
>>
>> Polly want a cracker.
>>
>> > It is rhetoric.
>>
>> Uh, I think that's what I said.
>>
>> > It shows the
>> >hypocrisy of so-called protection of marriage.
>>
>> No, it doesn't. It further masquerades it.
>
>**** marriage and its protection, if it going to depend on government,
>its air-head and its acts.
Hey, Shan! People in here don't call you ugly names merely because
you're a guy who likes guys. clean it up! Or quit posting your filth
in Christian groups! Have you EVER HEARD OF the word "restraint?" Or
the words "respecting others?"
I'm betting you're one who would get pissed off at somebody at work
and you'd use every filthy word you know, shouted at the top of your
lungs to tell them off, even on daughter's day with 20 young girls
running around.
Have some class!
Or I'll come cast out your demons!
jw
>
>The government we so richly deserve elegantly nukes our cretinous
>mutant med revue!
>
>Shan
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
X-Abuse-Re****t: abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<7b3e570ddec3dd6fb11315c965f84d80@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news.teranews.com!
not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 04:28:00 GMT
Lines: 61
From: Bracebridge Elaine's smoochie <ujie_the_troll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Reply-To: wikmti@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This question is worth =?iso-8859-1?Q?1=BD?= points: Who
said, "thinnk
of me whatever you prefer"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.biblestudy
Subject: Re: Gay-*** marriage Amend. needs Ban Divorce
References: <71bd538c.0402250603.5ade2f08@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<t4vq30ds6c6tdda7b20skk0uhem3j5vk2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402260928.4f77ef75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<hmes30tckbe2ck8hq8tn94280aufjakqev@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402261609.346a5dd0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<tght30572jct999igeor76t0f2uo83ogq7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
alt.religion.christian.baptist:506869
alt.religion.christian.biblestudy:282053
"jw
>
> x-no-archive:yes
> On 26 Feb 2004 16:09:06 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
>
> >Rob <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<hmes30tckbe2ck8hq8tn94280aufjakqev@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> >> On 26 Feb 2004 09:28:47 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
> >>
> >> >Rob <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<t4vq30ds6c6tdda7b20skk0uhem3j5vk2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> >> >> On 25 Feb 2004 06:03:34 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Since President George W. Bush announced on Tuesday his sup****t
for a
> >> >> >constitutional amendment banning same-*** marriage, my
recommendation
> >> >> >is to expand his so-called protection of marriage to include in
the
> >> >> >amendment a BAN ON DIVORCE, since we're at it.
> >> >>
> >> >> You obviously don't get it - what G.W. did was a stroke of
genius. By proposing
> >> >> a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage he placated both
sides. Those
> >> >> against gay marriage are placated because the most powerful man
in the world is
> >> >> sup****ting their agenda. Conversely, those for gay marriage are
happy because
> >> >> by the President proposing a constitutional amendment to ban gay
marriage he is
> >> >> admitting that it is currently unconstitutional to ban gay
marriage, and gay
> >> >> activists know that a constitutional amendment to ban gay
marriage will never
> >> >> happen. So what happens in the meantime - G.W. gets reelected.
> >> >
> >> >YOU are the one who does not get it.
> >>
> >> Polly want a cracker.
> >>
> >> > It is rhetoric.
> >>
> >> Uh, I think that's what I said.
> >>
> >> > It shows the
> >> >hypocrisy of so-called protection of marriage.
> >>
> >> No, it doesn't. It further masquerades it.
> >
> >**** marriage and its protection, if it going to depend on government,
> >its air-head and its acts.
>
> Hey, Shan! People in here don't call you ugly names merely because
> you're a guy who likes guys. clean it up! Or quit posting your filth
> in Christian groups! Have you EVER HEARD OF the word "restraint?" Or
> the words "respecting others?"
>
> I'm betting you're one who would get pissed off at somebody at work
> and you'd use every filthy word you know, shouted at the top of your
> lungs to tell them off, even on daughter's day with 20 young girls
> running around.
>
> Have some class!
>
> Or I'll come cast out your demons!
>
> jw
Does this bag for a reply!
ujb
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!crtntx1-
snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.biblestudy
Subject: Re: Gay-*** marriage Amend. needs Ban Divorce
Date: 27 Feb 2004 06:32:26 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <71bd538c.0402270632.777f4ed2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <71bd538c.0402250603.5ade2f08@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<t4vq30ds6c6tdda7b20skk0uhem3j5vk2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402260928.4f77ef75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<hmes30tckbe2ck8hq8tn94280aufjakqev@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402261609.346a5dd0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<tght30572jct999igeor76t0f2uo83ogq7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<7b3e570ddec3dd6fb11315c965f84d80@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.32.242.217
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1077892347 3633 127.0.0.1 (27 Feb 2004
14:32:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:32:27 +0000 (UTC)
alt.religion.christian.baptist:506992
alt.religion.christian.biblestudy:282100
Bracebridge Elaine's smoochie <ujie_the_troll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message news:<7b3e570ddec3dd6fb11315c965f84d80@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> "jw
> >
> > x-no-archive:yes
> > On 26 Feb 2004 16:09:06 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
> >
> > >Rob <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<hmes30tckbe2ck8hq8tn94280aufjakqev@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> > >> On 26 Feb 2004 09:28:47 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Rob <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<t4vq30ds6c6tdda7b20skk0uhem3j5vk2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> > >> >> On 25 Feb 2004 06:03:34 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan)
wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >Since President George W. Bush announced on Tuesday his
sup****t for a
> > >> >> >constitutional amendment banning same-*** marriage, my
recommendation
> > >> >> >is to expand his so-called protection of marriage to include
in the
> > >> >> >amendment a BAN ON DIVORCE, since we're at it.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> You obviously don't get it - what G.W. did was a stroke of
genius. By proposing
> > >> >> a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage he placated both
sides. Those
> > >> >> against gay marriage are placated because the most powerful man
in the world is
> > >> >> sup****ting their agenda. Conversely, those for gay marriage are
happy because
> > >> >> by the President proposing a constitutional amendment to ban
gay marriage he is
> > >> >> admitting that it is currently unconstitutional to ban gay
marriage, and gay
> > >> >> activists know that a constitutional amendment to ban gay
marriage will never
> > >> >> happen. So what happens in the meantime - G.W. gets reelected.
> > >> >
> > >> >YOU are the one who does not get it.
> > >>
> > >> Polly want a cracker.
> > >>
> > >> > It is rhetoric.
> > >>
> > >> Uh, I think that's what I said.
> > >>
> > >> > It shows the
> > >> >hypocrisy of so-called protection of marriage.
> > >>
> > >> No, it doesn't. It further masquerades it.
> > >
> > >**** marriage and its protection, if it going to depend on
government,
> > >its air-head and its acts.
> >
> > Hey, Shan! People in here don't call you ugly names merely because
> > you're a guy who likes guys. clean it up! Or quit posting your filth
> > in Christian groups! Have you EVER HEARD OF the word "restraint?"
Or
> > the words "respecting others?"
> >
> > I'm betting you're one who would get pissed off at somebody at work
> > and you'd use every filthy word you know, shouted at the top of your
> > lungs to tell them off, even on daughter's day with 20 young girls
> > running around.
> >
> > Have some class!
> >
> > Or I'll come cast out your demons!
> >
> > jw
jw, the child of a harlot's post does not appear in the thread.
Come suck my dick, excrement brain.
Love,
Shan
> Does this bag for a reply!
> ujb
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.biblestudy
Subject: Re: Gay-*** marriage Amend. needs Ban Divorce
Message-ID: <p5hv301ol68d6mdde7ueg1db47i37k8pmg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <71bd538c.0402250603.5ade2f08@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<t4vq30ds6c6tdda7b20skk0uhem3j5vk2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402260928.4f77ef75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<hmes30tckbe2ck8hq8tn94280aufjakqev@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402261609.346a5dd0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<tght30572jct999igeor76t0f2uo83ogq7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<7b3e570ddec3dd6fb11315c965f84d80@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<71bd538c.0402270632.777f4ed2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 86
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 22:28:40 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!news3.optonline.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!news.alt.net!
feed.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-
news.com!not-for-mail
alt.religion.christian.baptist:507125
alt.religion.christian.biblestudy:282195
x-no-archive:yes
On 27 Feb 2004 06:32:26 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
>Bracebridge Elaine's smoochie <ujie_the_troll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message news:<7b3e570ddec3dd6fb11315c965f84d80@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> "jw
>> >
>> > x-no-archive:yes
>> > On 26 Feb 2004 16:09:06 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
>> >
>> > >Rob <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<hmes30tckbe2ck8hq8tn94280aufjakqev@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> > >> On 26 Feb 2004 09:28:47 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan) wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> >Rob <Rob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<t4vq30ds6c6tdda7b20skk0uhem3j5vk2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> > >> >> On 25 Feb 2004 06:03:34 -0800, shankarees@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Shan)
wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> >Since President George W. Bush announced on Tuesday his
sup****t for a
>> > >> >> >constitutional amendment banning same-*** marriage, my
recommendation
>> > >> >> >is to expand his so-called protection of marriage to include
in the
>> > >> >> >amendment a BAN ON DIVORCE, since we're at it.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> You obviously don't get it - what G.W. did was a stroke of
genius. By proposing
>> > >> >> a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage he placated
both sides. Those
>> > >> >> against gay marriage are placated because the most powerful
man in the world is
>> > >> >> sup****ting their agenda. Conversely, those for gay marriage
are happy because
>> > >> >> by the President proposing a constitutional amendment to ban
gay marriage he is
>> > >> >> admitting that it is currently unconstitutional to ban gay
marriage, and gay
>> > >> >> activists know that a constitutional amendment to ban gay
marriage will never
>> > >> >> happen. So what happens in the meantime - G.W. gets reelected.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >YOU are the one who does not get it.
>> > >>
>> > >> Polly want a cracker.
>> > >>
>> > >> > It is rhetoric.
>> > >>
>> > >> Uh, I think that's what I said.
>> > >>
>> > >> > It shows the
>> > >> >hypocrisy of so-called protection of marriage.
>> > >>
>> > >> No, it doesn't. It further masquerades it.
>> > >
>> > >**** marriage and its protection, if it going to depend on
government,
>> > >its air-head and its acts.
>> >
>> > Hey, Shan! People in here don't call you ugly names merely because
>> > you're a guy who likes guys. clean it up! Or quit posting your
filth
>> > in Christian groups! Have you EVER HEARD OF the word "restraint?"
Or
>> > the words "respecting others?"
>> >
>> > I'm betting you're one who would get pissed off at somebody at work
>> > and you'd use every filthy word you know, shouted at the top of your
>> > lungs to tell them off, even on daughter's day with 20 young girls
>> > running around.
>> >
>> > Have some class!
>> >
>> > Or I'll come cast out your demons!
>> >
>> > jw
>
>jw, the child of a harlot's post does not appear in the thread.
You devout coward. Come to Seattle and call my mother a whore to my
face.
>
>Come suck my dick, excrement brain.
One small problem; you don't have a dick. And where there should be a
brain, you have an air pocket.
jw
>
>Love,
>Shan
>
>> Does this bag for a reply!
>> ujb
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups:
alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christ
ian.pentecostal
Subject: Re: Religious rights Violated and outlawed by the State
Message-ID: <eg7u305c2j87lplifql3ptsqj9l8uc86lb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <CrK_b.1229$LD5.162@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <103najh4h72g251
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <kkO_b.3125$QP.2971@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<Z4W_b.7276$yZ1.3643@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403cd4f8$4_2
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <ji2q30pvbf3hq5fe3fc59ff8k19ma9rsg4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403d9664
$1_1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 69
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 10:37:55 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!
news.alt.net!feed.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!
news.uncensored-news.com!not-for-mail
alt.religion.christian.baptist:506945
alt.religion.christian.pentecostal:293985
x-no-archive:yes
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:40:10 +0800, "Raymond"
<NOSPAM-rwknapp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"jw @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
>news:ji2q30pvbf3hq5fe3fc59ff8k19ma9rsg4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> x-no-archive:yes
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:24:08 +0800, "Raymond"
>> <NOSPAM-rwknapp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Jim" <Jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >news:Z4W_b.7276$yZ1.3643@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> The scriptures outlaw marriage between the races, forbid a widow to
>> >> marry, and require marriage to a rapist.
>> >
>> >The bible did teach to marry other races, and we see the Kings of
Isreal
>> >doing it, many times over. The Song of Soloman shows one wife was
BLACK
>and
>> >she lets everyone know about it.
>>
>> Good point, Raymond. Song of Solomon, in fact, represents she was
>> probably dark Ethiopian African, and also that she was Solomon's
>> favorite wife.
>
>You could get into trouble with these bigots if you agree that I made a
good
>point. :-)
LOL!!! It happens! As I've said to others, I mostly do nothing with
walksalone or Didymous but argue. But when one makes a statement with
which I agree, and I see an opening to do so, I shall.
Do not get too used to it. Not to offend, but since I don't consider
you a Christian by New Testament standards, I won't be doing it often.
>>
>>
>> Since I have NO clue what Ray is saying below, I'll stop here.
>
>Oh don't worry, they have no clue either.
Then I guess the next issue is, do YOU?
jw
>
>>
>>
>> jw
>>
>Yours truly in Jesus,
>
>Pastor Raymond W. Knapp, TH.B, D.D
>Founder:Pioneers For Jesus, approved by the IRS USA for tax exemptions.
>Christian Glorify Grace Church,3rd Floor, 14-16 Wo Fung Street, Luen Wo
>Market,Fanling, N.T. Hong Kong China
>Christian Corner Stone Church, TST, NT, Hong Kong
>The services are all in Chinese except when I preach and use English
with a
>translator.
>http://www.pioneers-for-
jesus.org/Pioneers_for_Jesus/newsletters/2003/sept-2003.htm
>
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!crtntx1-
snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
zeus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.octanews.net!
ash.uu.net!bassoon.i-cable.com!rain.i-cable.com!not-for-mail
From: "Raymond" <NOSPAM-rwknapp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups:
alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christ
ian.pentecostal
Subject: Re: Religious rights Violated and outlawed by the State
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:31:41 +0800
Organization: I-CABLE Communications Ltd.
Lines: 86
Message-ID: <403f4875_3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <CrK_b.1229$LD5.162@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <103najh4h72g251
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <kkO_b.3125$QP.2971@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<Z4W_b.7276$yZ1.3643@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403cd4f8$4_2
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <ji2q30pvbf3hq5fe3fc59ff8k19ma9rsg4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <403d9664
$1_1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <eg7u305c2j87lplifql3ptsqj9l8uc86lb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.83.110.90
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.253.57.100
alt.religion.christian.baptist:506977
alt.religion.christian.pentecostal:293994
"jw @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
news:eg7u305c2j87lplifql3ptsqj9l8uc86lb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> x-no-archive:yes
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:40:10 +0800, "Raymond"
> <NOSPAM-rwknapp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"jw @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
> >news:ji2q30pvbf3hq5fe3fc59ff8k19ma9rsg4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> x-no-archive:yes
> >> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:24:08 +0800, "Raymond"
> >> <NOSPAM-rwknapp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Jim" <Jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> >news:Z4W_b.7276$yZ1.3643@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> The scriptures outlaw marriage between the races, forbid a widow
to
> >> >> marry, and require marriage to a rapist.
> >> >
> >> >The bible did teach to marry other races, and we see the Kings of
Isreal
> >> >doing it, many times over. The Song of Soloman shows one wife was
BLACK
> >and
> >> >she lets everyone know about it.
> >>
> >> Good point, Raymond. Song of Solomon, in fact, represents she was
> >> probably dark Ethiopian African, and also that she was Solomon's
> >> favorite wife.
> >
> >You could get into trouble with these bigots if you agree that I made
a
good
> >point. :-)
>
> LOL!!! It happens! As I've said to others, I mostly do nothing with
> walksalone or Didymous but argue. But when one makes a statement with
> which I agree, and I see an opening to do so, I shall.
Well good for you.
>
> Do not get too used to it. Not to offend, but since I don't consider
> you a Christian by New Testament standards, I won't be doing it often.
Oh I won't, we been at each other for a year I think now, but as long as
we
can keep civil it be fine. Then I do consider myself a Believer in
Christ
by New Testament Standards that the blood of Jesus cleans me of all my
sins,
and I love Jesus with all my heart. So you do what you got to do, and I
do
the same. Thats Ok with me.
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> Since I have NO clue what Ray is saying below, I'll stop here.
> >
> >Oh don't worry, they have no clue either.
>
> Then I guess the next issue is, do YOU?
What the clue, I am not even sure what they were talking about, as I
don't
pay too much attention to foolish statements, I may reply to them, but
unless someone quotes what they are talking or were talking about I don't
waste time worrying about it. You be careful, somebody, I sure will clue
you in, as well as me, they feed on such stuff. We it seems just enjoy
posting.
>
> jw
>
> >Yours truly in Jesus,
> >
> >Pastor Raymond W. Knapp, TH.B, D.D
> >Founder:Pioneers For Jesus, approved by the IRS USA for tax
exemptions.
> >Christian Glorify Grace Church,3rd Floor, 14-16 Wo Fung Street, Luen
Wo
> >Market,Fanling, N.T. Hong Kong China
> >Christian Corner Stone Church, TST, NT, Hong Kong
> >The services are all in Chinese except when I preach and use English
with
a
> >translator.
>
>http://www.pioneers-for-
jesus.org/Pioneers_for_Jesus/newsletters/2003/sept-
2003.htm
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups:
alt.religion.christian,alt.politics,alt.politics.bush,soc.culture.israel,
alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.religion.christian.baptis
t
Subject: Re: Religious rights Violated and outlawed by the State
Message-ID: <1n7u30pqogb8bdhtrbgijfr1knjnniebso@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <CrK_b.1229$LD5.162@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<2ce735b1.0402250718.2d5f2afc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 129
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 27 Feb 2004 10:54:21 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!
easynews!news3.optonline.net!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!news.alt.net!
feed.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-news.com!news.uncensored-
news.com!not-for-mail
alt.politics:1598360 alt.politics.bush:2103196 soc.culture.israel:960082
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic:832310
alt.religion.christian.pentecostal:293986
alt.religion.christian.baptist:506947
x-no-archive:yes
On 25 Feb 2004 07:18:01 -0800, jgarbuz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(JGB) wrote:
>"Joseph Loegering" <Josephoegering@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
<CrK_b.1229$LD5.162@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> The President of these United States just defied the Righteous Way of
>> Almighty
>> God, casting off his way of The Holy Institution of Marriage as
immoral and
>> they
>> have manufactured their own ways for the Nation to walk therein and
>> persecute
>> Just Men and woman who walk in the steps of Moses, and Abraham, Jacob,
>> David,
>> Solomon, and other righteous men. <
>
>Polygamy, like slavery, was tolerated but that did not mean it was being
>condoned in the Bible. THe proof is that both Soloman and David suffered
>later in their reigns for their sins.
I see no mention that either Solomon or David was punished for
polygamy. In fact, even as a polygamist murderer, David remained "a
man after God's own heart." And if God hadn't approved/accepted
Solomon, he'd not have given him the Wisdom of the ages.
David was punished, not for polygamy, bur for murdering the husband of
the woman he committed adultery with ( I guess hundreds of wives
weren't enough).
In fact, within Judaism polygamy
>was later nullified by rabbinical law.
I believe you are incorrect.
But there were reasons why polygamy
>was allowed in those days. For one thing, many men were killed in wars
>and there would be a shortage of men to repopulate the land. THey were
the
>source of semen, while women were the source of wombs. One man could
>impregnate many women and thereby rebuild the population in relatively
>short order.
The reason I believe you are incorrect about rabbinical law ending
/nullifying polygamy is that it appears in the church in the 1st C, in
the NT. And Paul doesn't condemn the new Jewish-Christian polygamist
converts; he merely declares that they cannot be elders.
1TI 3:1 Here is a trustworthy saying: If anyone sets his heart on
being an overseer, he desires a noble task. 2 Now the overseer must be
above reproach, the husband of but one wife,
If we try to dig out some meaning here, evidently, there were
some/many of the flock who wanted to serve the congregation.
Pastors, deacons, elders, etc. (depending on what YOUR church calls
elders) So the pastors were appointing these eager members (as they
qualified spiritually by showing real maturity) to various positions
of responsibility (most likely associate pastors, elders, and deacons)
The polygamists were also eager to serve. They were evidently asking
for some sort of position of authority.
Paul heard of this dilemma, and he said, "No." The elder may only have
one wife!" I'm guessing that Paul believed (rightly) that any rich Jew
who had 20 wives and 50 children had his hands full at home.
Note from the passage absolutely NO condemnation for the Christian
polygamist; only a limitation. "No polygamist may be a pastor."
This is NOT a rebuke of divorce as some say. Those rebukes appear
ELSEwhere.
>
>In addition, since there were few things that women could do to
>sup****t themselves if their husband either died or left them, they were
>lucky if a prosperous man took her under his tent.
True. In those days, until at least the end of the 1st C AD, women had
little value other than to maintain the family (caring for the
home/kids, and being a baby factory and a ***ual pleasure machine--
surely no one in here believes that ***ual pleasure for its own sake
is a 21st C concept)
Also the idea from Rome that *** is ONLY for procreation couldn't be
further from the truth, since Paul also teaches that men have no right
to withhold pleasure from their female partner, nor do women have the
right to manipulate their men with *** pleasure. *** pleasure is to be
freely given, freely received.
1 Cor 7:3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and
likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The wife's body does not belong to
her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband's body
does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. 5 Do not deprive
each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may
devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan
will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this
as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all men were as I am.
But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has
that.
Sounds like ***ual pleasure is the primary reason for *** to ME.
But those days of
>total female dependence are long gone, so there is no reason for
polygamy
>to continue. It is also unfair as well as animalistic - a remnant of
chimpanzee
>days.
I can think of at least one EXCELLENT reason for polygamy in the
church today. But I don't wish to bore anyone. If you're interested
ask, and it doesn't apply to Americans; SORRY!
jw
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>And has outlawed Polygamous Marriage that
>> will
>> result in the persecution of Polygamous families here in the United
States
>> of
>> America.
>> Joseph
_________________________________________________________________________
______
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><>
<><><><><><>
========
From: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Jesus in sub-space: "The Passion"
Message-ID: <1fvs3095ioec9ooieq1jubrc6q1kc0ht3l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <d42e280e.0402260950.ab7dcab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news2.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 175
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor sup****t,
spam, illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Re****t-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 26 Feb 2004 23:04:28 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
Path: be1.texas.rr.com!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!
crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.n |
