On May 4, 3:37=A0pm, tmac100 <tmac1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> We found that Donna Kupp can attack Adventists on the charge that they
> preach things she said threatens the "UNITY" of the body of Christ in
> the faith, but quoted Psalms telling us we must not "fret ourselves
> because of evildoers" when we see posts claiming that all non-
> Catholics must die! =A0We're just showing you that Donna is a part of
> and Vatican Antichrist treason propaganda team, and that Rome has not
> changed
>
> Historically it is always prudent for despots and killers to outwardly
> defend freedom to even preserve their footsteps among men when they
> don't deserve to be with them. =A0Should I allow Donna and the other
> Jesuits to be my psychiatrist?? =A0How can she claim that freedom is
> good when she wants all non-Catholics dead? =A0She wants them to be FREE
> from this life so that she and her treasonous and killer brothers and
> sisters can rule!..
>
> "The cankers are biting the very entrails of the United States today:
> the Romish and the Mormon priests. Both are equally at work to form a
> people of the most abject, ignorant and fanatical slaves, who will
> recognize no other authority but their supreme pontiffs. Both are
> aiming at the destruction of our schools, to raise themselves upon our
> ruins. Both shelter themselves under our grand and holy principles of
> liberty of conscience, to destroy that very liberty of conscience, and
> bind the world under their heavy and ignominious yoke.
>
> The Mormon and the =A0priests are equally the uncompromising enemies of
> our Constitution and our laws; but the more dangerous of the two is
> the =A0-- the Romish priest, for he knows better how to conceal his
> hatred under the mask of friend****p and public good; he is better
> trained to commit the most cruel and diabolical deeds for the glory of
> God....
>
> Till lately, I was in favor of the unlimited liberty of conscience as
> our Constitution gives it to the Roman Catholics. But now, it seems to
> me that, sooner or later, the people will be forced to put a
> restriction to that clause towards the papists. [That was necessary
> during Abraham Lincoln's day, but freedom has effected the way of
> things to where most Catholics now sup****t it, and don't know a thing
> about the issues we are explaining here on this website. =A0The Jesuits,
> however, have not changed, but even more viciously still hate liberty
> and freedom for others. =A0They have infiltrated all society and
> religions and now more occupy non-Catholic faiths than their own in
> order to destroy those faiths, reduce implication to Rome as the cause
> and to destroy free societies all over the globe as well.] =A0Is it not
> an act of folly to give absolute liberty of conscience to a set of men
> who are publicly sworn to cut our throats the very day they have the
> op****tunity? Is it right to give the privilege of citizen****p to men
> who are sworn and public enemies of our constitution, our laws, our
> liberties, and our lives?
>
> The very moment that popery assumed the right to life and death on a
> citizen of France, Spain, Germany, England, or the United States, it
> assumed to be the power, the government of France, Spain, England,
> Germany, and the United States. THOSE STATES THEN COMMITTED A SUICIDAL
> ACT BY ALLOWING POPERY TO PUT A FOOT ON THEIR TERRITORY WITH THE
> PRIVILEGE OF CITIZEN****P. . . . WHEN POPERY WILL GIVE UP THE POWER OF
> LIFE AND DEATH WHICH IT PROCLAIMS AS ITS OWN DIVINE POWER IN ALL ITS
> THEOLOGICAL BOOKS AND CANON LAWS, THEN, AND THEN ALONE, IT CAN BE
> TOLERATED AND CAN RECEIVE THE PRIVILEGES OF CITIZEN****P IN A FREE
> COUNTRY." -- President Abraham Lincoln, Fifty Years in the Church of
> Rome, pg. 300.
>
> "Is it not an absurdity to give to a man a thing which he is sworn to
> hate, curse, and destroy? And does not the Church of Rome hate, curse,
> and destroy liberty of conscience whenever she can do it safely? I am
> for liberty of conscience in its noblest, broadest, highest sense. But
> I cannot give liberty of conscience to the Pope and to his followers,
> the Papists, so long as they tell me, through all their councils,
> theologians, and canon laws, that their conscience orders them to burn
> my wife, strangle my children, and cut my throat when they find their
> op****tunity! This does not seem to be understood by the people today.
> But sooner or later, the light of common sense will make it clear to
> every one that no liberty of conscience can be granted to men who are
> sworn to obey a Pope, who pretends to have the right to put to death
> those who differ from him religion." -- President Abraham Lincoln,
> Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chapter 60.
****************************************************************************=
*****
Joh 16:33 These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might
have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good
cheer; I have overcome the world.
|
