On May 4, 3:47=A0pm, tmac100 <tmac1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> If we allow that, ultimately she and her gang will work situations out
> where they will call for good Americans to be exterminated!
>
> We found that Donna Kupp can attack Adventists on the charge that they
> preach things she said threatens the "UNITY" of the body of Christ in
> the faith, but quoted Psalms telling us we must not "fret ourselves
> because of evildoers" when we see posts claiming that all non-
> Catholics must die! =A0We're just showing you that Donna is a part of
> and Vatican Antichrist treason propaganda team, and that Rome has not
> changed
>
> Historically it is always prudent for despots and killers to outwardly
> defend freedom to even preserve their footsteps among men when they
> don't deserve to be with them. =A0Should I allow Donna and the other
> Jesuits to be my psychiatrist?? =A0How can she claim that freedom is
> good when she wants all non-Catholics dead? =A0She wants them to be FREE
> from this life so that she and her treasonous and killer brothers and
> sisters can rule!..
>
> "The cankers are biting the very entrails of the United States today:
> the Romish and the Mormon priests. Both are equally at work to form a
> people of the most abject, ignorant and fanatical slaves, who will
> recognize no other authority but their supreme pontiffs. Both are
> aiming at the destruction of our schools, to raise themselves upon our
> ruins. Both shelter themselves under our grand and holy principles of
> liberty of conscience, to destroy that very liberty of conscience, and
> bind the world under their heavy and ignominious yoke.
>
> The Mormon and the =A0priests are equally the uncompromising enemies of
> our Constitution and our laws; but the more dangerous of the two is
> the =A0-- the Romish priest, for he knows better how to conceal his
> hatred under the mask of friend****p and public good; he is better
> trained to commit the most cruel and diabolical deeds for the glory of
> God....
>
> Till lately, I was in favor of the unlimited liberty of conscience as
> our Constitution gives it to the Roman Catholics. But now, it seems to
> me that, sooner or later, the people will be forced to put a
> restriction to that clause towards the papists. [That was necessary
> during Abraham Lincoln's day, but freedom has effected the way of
> things to where most Catholics now sup****t it, and don't know a thing
> about the issues we are explaining here on this website. =A0The Jesuits,
> however, have not changed, but even more viciously still hate liberty
> and freedom for others. =A0They have infiltrated all society and
> religions and now more occupy non-Catholic faiths than their own in
> order to destroy those faiths, reduce implication to Rome as the cause
> and to destroy free societies all over the globe as well.] =A0Is it not
> an act of folly to give absolute liberty of conscience to a set of men
> who are publicly sworn to cut our throats the very day they have the
> op****tunity? Is it right to give the privilege of citizen****p to men
> who are sworn and public enemies of our constitution, our laws, our
> liberties, and our lives?
>
> The very moment that popery assumed the right to life and death on a
> citizen of France, Spain, Germany, England, or the United States, it
> assumed to be the power, the government of France, Spain, England,
> Germany, and the United States. THOSE STATES THEN COMMITTED A SUICIDAL
> ACT BY ALLOWING POPERY TO PUT A FOOT ON THEIR TERRITORY WITH THE
> PRIVILEGE OF CITIZEN****P. . . . WHEN POPERY WILL GIVE UP THE POWER OF
> LIFE AND DEATH WHICH IT PROCLAIMS AS ITS OWN DIVINE POWER IN ALL ITS
> THEOLOGICAL BOOKS AND CANON LAWS, THEN, AND THEN ALONE, IT CAN BE
> TOLERATED AND CAN RECEIVE THE PRIVILEGES OF CITIZEN****P IN A FREE
> COUNTRY." -- President Abraham Lincoln, Fifty Years in the Church of
> Rome, pg. 300.
>
> "Is it not an absurdity to give to a man a thing which he is sworn to
> hate, curse, and destroy? And does not the Church of Rome hate, curse,
> and destroy liberty of conscience whenever she can do it safely? I am
> for liberty of conscience in its noblest, broadest, highest sense. But
> I cannot give liberty of conscience to the Pope and to his followers,
> the Papists, so long as they tell me, through all their councils,
> theologians, and canon laws, that their conscience orders them to burn
> my wife, strangle my children, and cut my throat when they find their
> op****tunity! This does not seem to be understood by the people today.
> But sooner or later, the light of common sense will make it clear to
> every one that no liberty of conscience can be granted to men who are
> sworn to obey a Pope, who pretends to have the right to put to death
> those who differ from him religion." -- President Abraham Lincoln,
> Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chapter 60.
****************************************************************************=
************
Mat 10:24 The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above
his lord.
Mat 10:25 It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and
the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house
Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household?
Mat 10:26 Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that
shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.
Mat 10:27 What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light: and
what ye hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops.
Mat 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to
kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul
and body in hell.
|
