Re: Interesting argument against evolution

"Sowed Man" <manager@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fbKd****ohuMaQWPanZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is it possible for a pattern to create a pattern more complex than
itself? 
> No compound can self-evolve into a more complex compound for
mathematical 
> reasons.  Only a highly complex scientist can genetically engineer a
cell. 
> UV-rays aren't complex enough to cause evolution.  And there is
currently no 
> complex element on this planet that could have caused DNA to be formed. 
DNA 
> is a pattern that creates another pattern (human body/brain)  By
definition 
> patterns can't create more complex patterns.  Evolution can explain
survival 
> of the fittest BUT is can't explain "CREATION of the FITTEST." 

And survival of the fittest works to weed out mutational changes,
therefore
mutational changes could not/can not be a mechanism of macroevolution.

> If you leave a pencil around it won't evolve it will devolve! 
Conceptual 
> evolution moves in the oppostite direction of science!  Imagine if you
left
> a Pinto around in your garage and cameback and found a  ****sche sadly
> this will never happen because evolution is mathematically impossible. 

True, but for some reason they present a different paradigm in the schools
in relation to origins.


Andrew