Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christian Teens > Re: 71% oppose ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 6138 of 6309
Post > Topic >>

Re: 71% oppose 'normalizing' homo***ual relation****ps

by "Huan-Don" <mojo_dojo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 2, 2008 at 11:40 PM

LetEmEatWMDs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Marie A.) wrote in
news:1dc521ed.0306221544.84131b2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> Letao <letao@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:<letao-3E6922.12581920062003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>... 
>> In article <0SFIa.1077$rN.10864@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>  niloc <niloc_nose@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>> > > Do you oppose homo***ual relation****ps ?
>> > 
>> > I dont think so
>> 
>> Do you oppose providing them with the same protections hetero***ual 
>> relation****ps enjoy?
>> 
>> > > Do you oppose normalizing homo***ual relation****ps ?
>> > 
>> > They cannot be normalised as the normal reason for a relation****p
>> > is to continue the genes.
>> 
>> What's 'normalized' got to do with anything?  What's a normal reason
>> for legally recognizing a relation****p?
> 
> Distinctions which come rather easily to anyone with a room
> temperature IQ are generally lost on liberals, especially liberals who
> happen to be knobgobblers. Normalize for purposes of this survey was
> clearly meant to convey the idea of accepting homo***ual relation****ps
> as opposed to tolerating them. That is to say, elevating them to a
> status equal to that of hetero***ual relation****ps, or equally
> desirable from society's point of view. Clearly the vast majority of
> people are firmly opposed to this while at the same time willing to
> grudgingly tolerate this ***ually aberrant behavior.
> 
> But surveys are sneaky things, and can be designed to elicit just
> about any response desired if one is clever enough with the language.
> For example, instead of using the word, normalize, I would have used
> the word, endorse. I believe the negative response would have
> registered even higher, say around 82% and upwards.      (Marie A.)

As Harvard Professor and lesbian activist Camille Paglia often says: 
There is no such thing as a "normal homo***ual." In the natural world, 
there is no room for "natural" or "normal" homo***ual behavior. Or to put 
it bluntly, she says: "In nature, its quite simple -- ***** fits 
vagina." Now that certainly doesn't mean we should treat gay people like 
2nd class citizens. But to lie, and try to pretend that homo***uality is 
a "normal" way of life is not going to do anybody any favors! A 
scientific study (not a survey) of gay men in San Francisco shows that 
the average lifespan for homo***ual men is 59 years! Compared to straight 
men, whose average lifespan is 72 years, gay men lose 13 years off their 
lives! That's NOT natural.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: 71% oppose 'normalizing' homo***ual relation****ps
"Huan-Don" <  2008-04-02 23:40:14 
Re: 71% oppose 'normalizing' homo***ual relation****ps
"A Brown" <R  2008-04-04 02:39:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 5:57:57 CDT 2008.