DontFeedTroll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Mar 26, 11:49 am, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>DontFeedTr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>>On Mar 25, 9:01 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>DontFeedTr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Mar 25, 7:52 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>DontFeedTr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>On Mar 25, 6:38 pm, DisbalancingMentallyIll
>>>>>>><mentally...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>In article
>>>>>>>><95abc672-1aea-477e-9291-070afa6fa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>Disappointing Zen Stories <l6m5n4o...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>><garbage snipped>
>>
>>>>>>>>Please help me.
>>
>>>>>>>Please don't feed that troll by replying, otherwise he might think
>>>>>>>that someone actually reads his vomit.
>>
>>>>>>oh no! It's the return of the dreaded "DontFeedTroll." Please,
>>>>>>DontFeedTroll, go the **** away. If we want to play with the troll,
we
>>>>>>damn well will. Go mind your own karma and let other grownups make
>>>>>>their own decisions. Thankyoueverso.
>>
>>>>>>Robert
>>
>>>>>>- - - - - - - -
>>
>>>>>Are you noticing how some of those troll's characteristics are
>>>>>beginning to
>>>>>take hold in you?
>>>>>Is that a good thing?
>>
>>>>Ever notice that you are a busybody control freak? **** off!
>>
>>>>The last time you came around here you left about 20 DoNotFeed
messages
>>>>that were much worse to wade through than the original messages.
People
>>>>know that "zen stories" is a troll and don't need you to inform them
or
>>>>make their decisions for them. Get a life!
>>
>>>>Robert
>>
>>>20 messages? Why do you exaggerate so?
>>>Control freak?
>>>Are you feeling OK?
>>>Trolls will keep posting as long as people reply. That's what they
>>>live off.
>>>If they're ignored, they will eventually crawl back under a rock.
>>
>>>But what makes you react so violently to my gentle requests?
>>>Look in a mirror - perhaps you see a control freak staring back at
>>>you?
>>>One can only get angry at characteristics that also exist in oneself.
>>>Characteristics that one does not have cannot trigger anger.
>>
>>And by the way, you left your little "Do Not Feed the Troll" message on
>>the full messages of at least six or seven posts in a row, creating a
>>whole new group of Spam repeat messages that had to be waded through.
>>Believe me, when you do that, you are not helping the situation. If you
>>want to leave one "please do not feed" message in a given time period,
>>I'm sure I will not react so strongly. Just don't pile it on, or feel
>>that you have to leave an anti-message for every single response.
>>Ultimately, if people DO want to feed the troll, you should let them do
>>it and leave them alone. You don't get to keep bothering people if they
>>make a choice you don't like.
>
>
> <Tang>
> Why get so upset at mere words on the screen?
> It's all fluff, it's all made up.
> Better just relax and be serene.
> </Tang>
>
> Robert, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.
"Goodbye" is a welcome comment in this context. However, you seem
incapable of addressing the points I raised. To say this conversation
cannot serve a purpose seems rather selfish. My points are about
whether you should try to control others' actions or not. Apparently
you do not want to look at your role in that context. Good luck! I am
more interested in having you mind your own business than having a
conversation with you, [although I would love to have you challeng your
role as well,] so keep that in mind if you don't want to have another
"purposeless talk."
Robert
= = = = = = = = =
|
