<Hasley9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ab688e26-98af-46e7-aaba-2ddba5dd46a5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Well ..... ! Your religious organisation did sue a similarly named
> > religious organisation with a view to having that latter organisation
> > cease
> > and desist from using various symbols (common to both organisations)
for
> > which your religious organisation claims exclusive owner****p.
> The suit was filed by the Remeyites. The NSA was merely seeking to
> have the decision made on that occassion enforced. The judge ruled
> that the Orthodox Baha'is and the BUPC are not legitimate successors
> to Mason Remey.
Wow! Does that make them the legitimate successor to Shoghi then?
Now your sect sure as hell is not a legitimate de jure successor to
Shoghi.
You've had to change the constitution to justify your power structure. At
the same time, Remey is not a legitimate successor, not being appointed in
accordance with the terms of a do***ent, whose provenance, in any case, is
suspect. It I was you, which thankfully I'm not, I would not be blowing
my
foghorn about anything Bahaistic - irrespective of my sectarian leaning.
Why don't you face facts - Bahaism is as corrupt and dysfunctional as the
rest of the religions around. Mebbe it's worse and in a class of its own!
Damn it all! It crumbled at the first hurdle of succession to the
Guardian****p. Old Shoghi made an absolute hames of the situation and
that's
the claim to divine guidance defenestrated, which makes you just another
tatty little religious group trying to grasp relevance, with no divine
foundations on which to base your pretensions or your grasping!
About the best that can be said of you is that you attract a lower class
of
enemy e.g. the Bayani Banshees!
And you can't even claim to be occupying my time any more as I'm rarely
around here.
By all means, practice your religious faith in accordance with the
dictates
of your conscience. Just do us all a big favour and don't come out with
****e, like that garbage of yours above, and then act outraged when it's
transparency and inaccuracy is remarked upon
|
