"Viv" <viv_jacobson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:d9849e8d-db25-4e8a-bd6a-0104f9901264@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 1 May, 01:57, "Asparagus" <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Viv" <viv_jacob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:49de6df2-3a5e-4b78-95c1-0e566222067e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On 29 Apr, 11:41, "Baha'i Censor****p - See Website"
>>
>> > Of course Fred didn't reply directly, that would be too big a breach
>> > of his "shunning is bad, only I am allowed to do it, I do it to
anyone
>> > I don't like" rule. But look at the way, after his hypocrisy and
>> > double standards were pointed out, he moved to change the header
>>
>> He actually restored it ... after you had changed it and ..... you've
>> changed it again.
>>
>> So much for hypocrisy!
>
> As you know very well, not being stupid, the charge of hypocrisy was
> against Fred complaining of Susan using a "false" e-mail identity in
> the same way he does, and his going on about the Baha'is using "libel,
> defamataion, ad-hom, all the rest of it" while he launches an
> extensive ad hominem against Susan virtually every time she posts.
Your charge was against Fred; his charge was against Susie!
To a neutral observer it could look like it all square - the entire kit
and
caboodle is composed of and inhabited by religious freaks intent not so
much
on acquisition of the divine fragrances but on knocking several shades of
**** out of each other. So much for Bahai as the universal religion of
tolerance, understanding and universal brotherhood when its various
factions
tapdance on each other.
Good tip for around here is not to play to the gallery but attempt to win
the neutral observer, if indeed there is one herabouts.
|
