Re: Court issues decision in NSA contempt case against Orthodox Baha'is

<Hasley9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:5aeb869e-854a-4111-adc9-cfbe63146ecf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Given the Opinion, she has a history well worth reflecting on....
>
> Which has what to do with the fact that it was Mason Remey who first
> had a lawsuit filed on his behalf against the NSA. He didn't just
> 'allow' it, he ordered it.
>
> It's the Guardian who is supposed to be the authorized interpreter of
> the Writings. According to Shoghi Effendi he is infallible in this
> function as well as in protecting the Faith. If one argues, as Jeffrey
> does that that such court case was misguided and contrary to the
> Teachings one is effectively arguing that either:
>
> 1) That Shoghi Effendi was wrong when we stated that the Guardian was
> infallible in these two areas.
>
> or
>
> 2) Mason Remey was no Guardian.

So where does Shoghi's infallibility hang in the case against Sohrab .... 
which was lost?

> Of course, from your standpointthere was never a legitimate Guardian
> to begin with since you don't believe in the Will and Testament. Which
> makes your sup****t of the Remeyites seem rather strange.

Not in the least ... it has to do with respect for the beliefs of others
and 
their freedom to believe as they do irrespective of how idiotic their 
beliefs are ... which explains why you are permitted to hang loose around 
here (and elsewhere) and attempt to convince a gullible reader****p that
your 
views are not idiotic.