> Please consider that after spending over $100,000
When did you become privy to the NSA's legal bills?
trying to destroy
> three Baha'i denominations of fewer than a 100 people, and after
> Judge Amy St. Eve of the U. S. District Court of Northern Illinois has
> ruled against the Wilmette nsa in its frivolous lawsuit,
News flash. It wasn't a lawsuit. What the NSA was seeking was a
contempt of court citation for a lawsuit which the Remeyites
themselves had initiated and lost in 1966. Nothing in the judge's
ruling suggested that action requested was frivolous. She simply held
that the Remeyite organizations which exist today cannot be regarded
as the same as the original one which filed the lawsuit to begin
with.
seeking to deprive
> U. S. citizens of their Constitutional rights,
The judges decision had nothing to do with the Remeyites
Constitutional Rights.
the usual tactic of ignoring
> and changing the issue is now being deployed by members of the
> Baha'i denomination based on a fraudulent will and testament.
News flash! Both parties involved in this court case regard the W&T as
authentic.
> Fortunately, for the sake of the freedom and liberty of Orthodox
> Baha'is and Baha'is of other denominations, Judge Amy St. Eve
> was not fooled by such cult techniques. Her name will live forever
What for? Ruling that the Orthodox Baha'is and PUBC weren't follower
the same as the NSA-HG? Read the court case, Freddie. It wasn't about
freedom or liberty. It was whether current Remeyite organizations are
bound by a ruling made against them when they were still united.
>
> The response of the Haifan apologists is evidence, once again, why
> the Orthodox Baha'is should counter-sue the Haifan Baha'is for the
> damages they have incurred from the frivolous lawsuit,
Can't counter-sue a non-existent law suit.
|
