> Given the Opinion, she has a history well worth reflecting on....
Which has what to do with the fact that it was Mason Remey who first
had a lawsuit filed on his behalf against the NSA. He didn't just
'allow' it, he ordered it.
It's the Guardian who is supposed to be the authorized interpreter of
the Writings. According to Shoghi Effendi he is infallible in this
function as well as in protecting the Faith. If one argues, as Jeffrey
does that that such court case was misguided and contrary to the
Teachings one is effectively arguing that either:
1) That Shoghi Effendi was wrong when we stated that the Guardian was
infallible in these two areas.
or
2) Mason Remey was no Guardian.
Of course, from your standpointthere was never a legitimate Guardian
to begin with since you don't believe in the Will and Testament. Which
makes your support of the Remeyites seem rather strange.
